HighTech

tenho os 2 Simuladores, vejam como estão minhas pastas de cada um

Knich, This could cause problems; it's best to follow the ASOBO/Microsoft recommendations, each in its proper place.

kiek, As I said, the purpose of the "Community2024" folder is for airports and add-ons that are COMPATIBLE with MSFS2024, and NOT native to MSFS2024. Kiek voce é do Brasil kkkk, desculpe, respondi em inglês também porque é a lingua oficial aqui

Correction: SBSB has a specific version for MSFS 2024 that is compatible, not native. That is, if you have SBSB in your MSFS 2020, you need to get the compatible version from the developer's website and install it in the "Community2024" folder, and not move everything from the MSFS 2020 folder to 2024. Therefore, you need to analyze each airport. We know that many airports that were in MSFS 2020 work in MSFS 2024, but you need to put them in the correct folder to avoid future problems. Regarding your last question, if you uninstall, everything in the "Community" folder will be deleted from MSFS 2020, so you need to make a copy of this folder to analyze what goes to MSFS 2024. Note: The "Community" folders for each version of MSFS are in different locations, so don't worry, uninstalling MSFS2020 won't harm MSFS2024. But one tip: simply moving the files isn't enough; you have to analyze the situation. Many developers adapted versions of MSFS2020 to MSFS2024, meaning you can't just copy them from one to the other. But if you said everything is working fine, then okay.

Noel, You will only move what is compatible with MSFS2024. To do this, you need to ask the developer or do an internet search. For example, in the image below, you can see that SBSP is compatible with MSFS2024, so it needs to be moved to the "Community2024" folder.

Tuskin38, negative, The "Community" folder is only for airports and add-ons native to MSFS2024, and the "Community2024" folder is for airports/add-ons that are compatible with MSFS2024 and also work in MSFS2020. Want real proof of this? Just install any add-on using a standard installation program, for example, if you bought something specific for MSFS2024 from sites like "simmarket.com" or "ORBX," you will see that during installation, the installer will install only in the "Community" folder. If you buy an add-on that is for both MSFS2020 and MSFS2024, you will see that it will be automatically installed in the "Community2024" folder.

I still use FSX MSFS2020 and for about 3 months I've been preparing the way for MSFS2024, it's already installed on an SSD just for it. The experience is great, I still use FSX and MSFS2020 because of some aircraft and add-ons that I like from them. I believe that in about a year everything will be for MSFS2024. Incredibly, the performance is better in MSFS2024 than in MSFS2020. The airport loading is top-notch, everything is very fast, between 3 and 7 seconds.

Okay everyone, in summary, we have 3 situations: 1 - For those who only have MSFS2024 and native airports: Community - install the native airports for MSFS2024 here Community2024 - install nothing here 2 - For those who have MSFS2020 and MSFS2024: Community - install the native airports for MSFS2024 here Community2024 - install the airports compatible with MSFS2024 that were also from MSFS2020 here - Note: the developer always informs whether the airport is compatible with MSFS2024 or not. 3 - For those who only have MSFS2024 and want to use compatible MSFS2020 airports: Community - install the native MSFS2024 airports here Community2024 - install the MSFS2024 compatible airports that were also from MSFS2020 here - Note: the developer always informs whether the airport is compatible with MSFS2024 or not. Note: even if you have MSFS2020 and MSFS2024, the folders are in different locations and there will be no conflict, this is correct. Asoso got it right.

I agree, since FSX Microsoft still has problems with Clouds. FSX Clouds are better in terms of sharpness and without pixels, especially the high-level clouds. ASobo and Microsoft need to fix this once and for all, or we will have to wait for REX or REX (remember?) to release their own clouds like the ones released for FSX. I still prefer the clouds below FSX.

Michal Trzesniowski Muito Obrigado, reinstalando o DirectX, todos os sons voltaram a funcionar, Agradeço muito

Hello Fppilot, I understand your question, but I'm not saying that the product is bad, but that need corrections because look beautiful landscapes and more real, like other reviewers here too seek. There is much difference in color and many lines separating the states. I do not remember flying see the top lines separating states. If MegaSceneryEarth give more value to mountainous regions, you can be sure that I will be a customer of them. As already said, "Ultra-Res National Parks - Olympic Mountains" was great, because it is not so close to the mainland, there is a good portion of the ocean between the mountains not giving the color difference printing, resulting in a more realistic appearance. Of course, every suggestion and criticism and welcome and appreciate your opinion.

Me too still use the older packages of SoCal, Phoenix, Florida, and Las Vegas today. and I did not have this color difference so big. Take a look at Google earth, there is this huge difference in colors, so believe it way rather than better. At least they could take the lines of boundaries that are so visible.

Beerwolfe, You're right, until we resolve this, do not buy any more state. The only worthwhile at the moment and bought and look great is the "Ultra-Res National Parks - Olympic Mountains." Because it is a mountainous area, the lack of night texture does so much.Already I asked them to do only some mountainous regions, Cordillera of the Andes and Himalayas kind and leave the smoother Photoreal the outline of the scene and not one bunch of squares in different colors. Dogtrack, accurate, the price is cheap, but even in Europe have differences of colors and will be difficult to compete also with Orbx EUROPE. So I say, what they save and fazeram the Photoreal only the most mountainous regions of Europe.

Look at the picture attached, there is a serious failure of transition from one state to another, between New Mexico and Colorado. There can be no lines separating one state from another. The color is also very different, had to be like that, like the images of GoogleEarth. So it is strange flying the US. I am still awaiting the PCaviator for this correction, since bought many states and all are different colors and lines separating from one another. The states with ultra-resolution are also not well, see the color difference in the attached pictures. I keep buying, but need to solve this and leave a color pattern and no lines.

Guys, I'm trying to solve this problem without success, to see in the figure that the top is normal Zoom in on my Eyefinity but what is below, see I can not even see the runway, already tried everything and zoom does not decrease, and 0.30 as is the default and only increases not decrease further. In normal mode on one monitor is right, but when I put in 3, is like this. If anyone can give a help to decrease as the field of view, thank you very much. Remember that in other games this does not happen then it can only be some setting in FSX.

Mr. Styckx note 10, paid more attention in your solution and solved everything, I do not know how to thank you. Hugs ...

I think I'm having the same problem but can not find this option in the catalyst, the mine is 12.10. See the images attached to the outline of objects in the image are bad 1 being the sapphire 6950 and VGA in image 2 are good MSI's VGA 6870. How to solve the 6950 VGA? From already thank you.