xsever

You should submit a ticket with this. IF it's a bug, they will know and they will fix it.

No but shouldn't have to pay neither 🤣 Sure. No one/nothing is perfect but a bug as simple as autobrake being too aggressive even on low should've been spotted on Flight # 01 of beta testing if the QA/QC was being done decently. I'm not asking for an utopian case where planes release with zero bugs, but I also perfectly understand that some bugs are too obvious and easy to spot and hence should be fixed during beta whereas other bugs will not pop their heads until after release, and that's fine, and can be fixed with further updates. Sad but true and wise. I think the problem is that the bar is dropping lower and lower with time and some early adopters are just getting fed up.

I think the early adopters who purchased the plane on day 1 and are reporting bugs through the official channels should be given a discount code that they can use when the -100 version is released. I've been following this thread closely and some of the bugs reported indeed should've been identified and resolved during beta testing. Like how can a proper beta program not identify the overly aggressive autobrake on low? That's a simple one no? In all cases, I'm sure this plane will mature into a very good product and when that happens, more and more will buy it.

One cannot but bow in front of the Concorde. If I had more time at hand to dedicate to simming, I would definitely install P3D just for it but my current time budget is very limited and I spent enough time tweaking MSFS2024 to my liking that I am now dedicating my time to enjoying the various airliners I fly. I will admit though that reading your description of operating the Concorde was a bit overwhelming 😅. Cheers!

Please allow me to sincerely thank you for sharing this video. This is hands-down the best explanation I have seen online of the Microsoft-Asobo sorcery/witchcraft they did with the controls for 2024.

I did more testing about this and I think there's something wrong with dynamic FG in the mod because it's the only constant that is resulting in the "15 FPS" bug. As soon as I disable dynamic FG, the FPS gradually recover to 30 FPS in an almost time linear way: 15 18 20 ..... 30 30. I even tried Manual instead of Fixed and set the FPS target to 57 (0.95 x 60) and the bug still occurred when focus was lost and regained. I went back to Manual FG X2 and 57 and everything worked fine. TLDR: This is not an issue with AutoFPS but with the mod itself I believe. What I discovered reminded me why I didn't use this mod in the past: as soon as you pop out a display from the cockpit, the mod crashes and crashes the sim with it. Could this be your problem as well? I read that this was a limitation of the mod in April 2026 but I had hoped that this was resolved by now. I am now at a crossroads: 1) Nexus mod and no popped-out displays on my two additional monitors or 2) no nexus mod and stick with Lossless Scaling but benefit from popped-out displays. I'm gonna have to do some testing to see which path I can live with more.

Thank you for the timely feedback. The target set in the mod is 60 while the target set in the sim is 30. Man FG X2 and FPS=58 worked wonders so the FPS value definitely needs to be the post-FG value. Regard the weird 15 FPS, @AnkH suggested I turn on two settings inside the mod which I will do tomorrow and revert back. Since him and I are using this mod, maybe we can help you address it in the readme as it is getting more popular amongst simmers with 3000- and 4000-series cards.

I can confirm that using this same logic with the nexus mod gave me the best results. I lock my FPS in the sim to 30 and used the mod to get 2x to achieve 60 which works wonders. Using the logic above, I used Man FG 2x and a manual target of 58 and that worked very well. I wanted to experiment with the mod's dynamic FG option enabled for the odd occasion where I can't achieve 30 FPS and when I did that, I changed the AutoFPS setting to DynFG and kept the target at 58. Things worked well but as soon as I clicked on another window and focus was lost from the sim window and then I refocused the sim's window, the FPS dropped to 15 as reported by AutoFPS FS Source and it was stuck there. The only way to go back to the native 30 FPS was by disabling the mod's dynamic FG. I went back to Man FG 2X and things were back to perfect. Is this a problem with the mod or this due to a misconfigured setting in AutoFPS caused by me when switching to DynFG with the FPS value set to 58? I find the number 15 (30/2) intriguing and you will probably know right away what was happening. Thanks.

Now imagine a fictional nightmare where Apple made flight simulators and add-ons for it. Just imagine how bad the pricing scheme would be with zero possibility for modding. What do you mean? I have a Mobiflight profile for the Avro RJ that allows me to use the WinCTRL PAP3 MCP with it where all the AP values are displayed on it. The profile had a bug where it didn't display CRS2 Selector so I used debug mode and Ctrl+G to grab the value of the LVAR and then program it into the Mobiflight profile. Is this what you're looking for or something completely different?

I am an engineer and love the technical aspects of things and also have my PPL so what keeps the spark glowing for me are two things: 1) learning new airliners with all their complex systems and flows and checklists and doing my best to fly them just like they are flown in real life based on YouTube cockpit videos and 2) flying for virtual airline alliances where I can experience what it's like to be a pilot for so many airlines and what it's like the fly out of their hubs and to also discover and explore all the destinations they fly to. This ensures that there is always something new that keeps me engaged I'm lucky enough to have been able to fly in the jumpseat of A320s and A330s for entire flights and as far as systems and SOPs are concerned, we are so lucky and blessed with the current capabilities of our home simulators (software and hardware). If it weren't for FSX, I wouldn't have gotten my PPL. Cheers!

Happy to report the same. Working flawlessly. Thank you.

No it does not happen with Lossless Scaling as I have been using it for a while now.

I am in the same boat as the OP. Currently running an LG 27" 1080p monitor with my 3090 and I am looking into upgrading to 1440p to benefit from a larger screen and from the VRAM headroom I have (total of 24 GB). I know the 3090 is powerful enough to drive the 1440p monitor and another smaller monitor or two for popped instruments but will the 14400F bottleneck me at all or no? With these monitors being 180 Hz, can I still limit them to 60 Hz in Windows so that I continue locking the sim at 30 FPS and using Lossless Scaling to achieve 60 FPS? Below are my options from cheaper to more expensive: Expert-ZoneAcer Nitro XZ320Q S3 31.5-Inch 180Hz Curved Gaming Monito...Expert Features 31.5-Inch Immersive Curved Gaming Display : Massive 31.5-inch panel with aggressive 1500R curvature wraps around your field of view for deeper immersion in FPS games, racing sims, RPGsExpert-ZoneMSI MAG 325QF E18V 31.5-Inch WQHD Rapid VA 180Hz Gaming M...Expert Features 31.5-Inch WQHD Gaming Canvas : Big-screen 2560 × 1440 sharpness gives you more detail than Full HD, perfect for immersive gaming, racing sims, FPS maps, RPG worlds, and daily multimediExpert-ZoneASUS ROG Strix XG32WCS 31.5-Inch QHD 1500R Fast VA Gaming...BRAND-NEW SEALED ~ 6 MONTHS WARRANTY Expert Features 31.5-Inch QHD Curved Display : The 2560 × 1440 resolution delivers significantly more detail and workspace than Full HD, while the 1500R curvature

I would love to know more how you set this up: nvidia control panel or the app or how? Other settings to go with it? Thank you in advance.

Yes very grateful for EasyCPDLC for planes that don't support CPDLC natively. Yeah VATSIM supports it without any issue. The only "downside" is that it's a standalone app rather than being built into the plane which takes away a bit from the immersion. That's it.