denon75

recommend AsRock Z370 Extreme 4 best 12 power phase vram section to overclock and best price/quality ratio https://www.asrock.com/mb/Intel/Z370 Extreme4/index.asp

https://www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/handbooks_manuals/aviation/phak/ https://www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/handbooks_manuals/aviation/airplane_handbook/

please read how Steam is "generous" for 3P Developers: recommend to read the article: Are Valve and Steam Helping PC Gaming or Hurting It? https://www.extremetech.com/gaming/249519-valve-steam-helping-pc-gaming-hurting

Interesting discussion from user perspective [ how business model works ] Key concerns imo importance order: 1 Simulated Aircraft need to be licence by the aircraft producer - what about historic? or freeware? - high licence Fees? - no more competition within one platform [ e.g. iFly, Pmdg, wilco ] 2 Steam/Dovetail % cuts lowering Developer revenue/profits - not always volume compensate lower unit margin as total margin 3 Potenially imposed Quality Control limiting Developers and incensing costs, however may be beneficial for customers [ less beta aircrafts @ full price ]

I had the same problem

imho opposite, Mr. rsrandazzo is the person who should contact Dovetail not vice versa.

compatible only: Lockheed Martin Prepar3D v1.4 or v2.xsee QW www http://www.qualitywingssim.com/146.html section system requirements

forget - CPU throttling

but even the fix is applied feelther 175/195 in P3Dv3 is not able to save panels state and flight plan only speed, hight, 2d panels, flaps position etc

solution there: http://www.avsim.com/topic/490124-malformed-xml/?p=3437020

according http://onlineflightplanner.org/ flight plan AIRAC 1610 is: KDTW SID FWA J64 BDF J26 IRK STAR KMKC first waypoint FWA correct then VIA J64 TO BDF then VIA J26 TO IRK that all in this section then DEP/ARR https://skyvector.com/files/tpp/1610/pdf/00119FORTWAYNE.PDF

ejets v2 installs in P3Dv3, you can fly it but not able to save panel state [ in case you want to save programmed FMS and scenario during e.g. cruise ]

see my post from couple months ago http://www.avsim.com...2016/?p=3401162 concluding: imo not worth pay extra 50% for 1% performane FSX,P#D gain, unless you are in video editing so you will be able o utilize HT guys on 6700K anyway have disabled HT for P3D better performance

see my post from couple months ago http://www.avsim.com/topic/485099-new-build-for-p3d-v32-march-2016/?p=3401162 concluding: imo not worth pay extra 50% for 1% performane FSX,P#D gain, unless you are in video editing so you will be able o utilize HT guys on 6700K anyway have disabled HT for P3D better performance

joining the discussion i am looking for advice: Is it worth from P3D v3 performance point of view to pay more for 6700k over 6600k? I find opinion that is not worth it based on gaming benchmarks http://www.ocaholic.ch/modules/smartsection/item.php?itemid=3948&page=9