denon75

see my post from couple months ago http://www.avsim.com...2016/?p=3401162 concluding: imo not worth pay extra 50% for 1% performane FSX,P#D gain, unless you are in video editing so you will be able o utilize HT guys on 6700K anyway have disabled HT for P3D better performance

see my post from couple months ago http://www.avsim.com/topic/485099-new-build-for-p3d-v32-march-2016/?p=3401162 concluding: imo not worth pay extra 50% for 1% performane FSX,P#D gain, unless you are in video editing so you will be able o utilize HT guys on 6700K anyway have disabled HT for P3D better performance

joining the discussion i am looking for advice: Is it worth from P3D v3 performance point of view to pay more for 6700k over 6600k? I find opinion that is not worth it based on gaming benchmarks http://www.ocaholic.ch/modules/smartsection/item.php?itemid=3948&page=9

One questions which bother me Is it worth from P3D v3 performance point of view to pay more for 6700k over 6600k? I am reading this thread and others and cannot find reliable information. I only find opinion that is not worth it based on gaming benchmarks (not P3D) 6700k vs 6600k and conclusion was: quote: Bottom line, there is virtually no performance difference between the Core i7-6700K and the Core i5-6600K and it doesn't matter whether you overclock the CPU or not. In other words it also means it doesn't matter if you have CPU with four cores and four threads or one with eight threads for gaming. Buying a Core i7-6700K over a Core i7-6600K makes sense if you do a lot of video encoding or you run other applications which require a lot of processing power from numerous threads. In the case of gaming it still looks like four cores with four threads are sufficient. Looking at the price reveals another good reason to decide in favor of the smaller CPU, whereas the Core i7-6700K costs 348 Euro these days and the Core i5-6600K sells for 233 Euro. http://www.ocaholic.ch/modules/smartsection/item.php?itemid=3948&page=9

So far, should be achievable in flight simulator :-)

I use and recommend Thrustmaster T.16000M [ cost ca 50$ ] (Hall Effect AccuRate Technology) offers greater precision due to magnetic sensors which allow for friction-free action Avsim review http://www.avsim.com/pages/0212/Thrustmaster/Joystick.html

FSX goes good with Intel,Nvidia (unfortunately combo AMD CPU & GPU does not provide FSX good performance)

There is answer for your question: http://eu.wiley.com/WileyCDA/WileyTitle/productCd-0764588222.html I went through all lessons [ btw. great manual ]

Simmarket has Lionheart Learjet LJ24B 50% off until 7th April link: http://secure.simmarket.com/lionheart-lj24b-fsxp3dp3dv2.phtml

recommend saitek pro flight cessna yoke with throttles It has 180 degree rotation, very realistic

Just bought @10Euro 727-100 + L1011 could not resist

after bezel correction the resolution is always higher than 5760 (3x1920) I use triple monitor with bezel corrections and my resolution is 6020x1080

FQ dials are inaccurate regardless drivers. Design flaw.Can live with that, there is no better alternative for similar price

Merry Christmas! from Poland

stick_sensitivity_mode=0 change axes into linear input vs nonlinear you may as well adjust numbers in aircraft.cfg /section [flight_tuning] .... elevator_trim_effectiveness =1.000 aileron_trim_effectiveness =1.000 rudder_trim_effectiveness =1.000 ....

please help me with one question: whether FibAcc should be open and active when running FSX or once configured may stay closed?

Question re. FSX vs P3Dv2 GPUs/multiplescreens capabilities in DX9 and DX10 I use below described configuration in FSX DX9 [full screen mode]: GPU 1 [gtx780] connected to 3 Dell monitors [1920x1080p] [one surround display 5760x1080p] [Virtual cockpit] GPU 2 [motherboard Intel HD3000] connected to one Acer monitor [1366x768] as extended display [for PFD, ND, etc] In FSX DX10 [using SteveFX] the configuration [2 GPUs] does not work [does not work either full and windowed mode]. It works only with one GPU1 [gtx780] + 3xDells. [both full and windowed modes] I would like ask Avsim users who have P3Dv2 and similar config [especially two GPUs serving surround and extended display] whether such config will work in P3Dv2 in DX10 or DX11. My objective is to run simulator [only hope is P3Dv2x] in DX10 using 2 GPUs/surround 5760x1080 and extended display for instruments. Looking forward to your opinions. Thanks.

Question re. FSX vs P3Dv2 GPUs/multiplescreens capabilities in DX9 and DX10 I use below described configuration in FSX DX9 [full screen mode]: GPU 1 [gtx780] connected to 3 Dell monitors [1920x1080p] [one surround display 5760x1080p] [Virtual cockpit] GPU 2 [motherboard Intel HD3000] connected to one Acer monitor [1366x768] as extended display [for PFD, ND, etc] In FSX DX10 [using SteveFX] the configuration [2 GPUs] does not work [does not work either full and windowed mode]. It works only with one GPU1 [gtx780] + 3xDells. [both full and windowed modes] I would like ask Avsim users who have P3Dv2 and similar config [especially two GPUs serving surround and extended display] whether such config will work in P3Dv2 in DX10 or DX11. My objective is to run simulator [only hope is P3Dv2x] in DX10 using 2 GPUs/surround 5760x1080 and extended display for instruments. Looking forward to your opinions. Thanks.

thanks Scott. I will keep then usb quadrant.

Question re. Saitek quadrant USB vs PS2 version (yoke system) and theirs levers and “0 button detent”. I have both and realize that USB version has very soft “0 button detent” . I can hardly feel when the thrust lever is in the lowest position or in reverse thrust Whereas in the PS2 version “0 button detent” is firm very easy to distinguish two lever positions i.e. zero thrust and reverse thrust. My doubts are whether I have bought faulty USB quadrant or it is normal in compare to PS2 quadrant. If someone who has both quadrants could compare it on its own quadrants and let me Thank you

Question re. Saitek quadrant USB vs PS2 version (yoke system) and theirs levers and “0 button detent”. I have both and realize that USB version has very soft “0 button detent” . I can hardly feel when the thrust lever is in the lowest position or in reverse thrust Whereas in the PS2 version “0 button detent” is firm very easy to distinguish two lever positions i.e. zero thrust and reverse thrust. My doubts are whether I have bought faulty USB quadrant or it is normal in compare to PS2 quadrant. If someone who has both quadrants could compare it on its own quadrants and let me Thank you

I am considering change video card. ATI68501Gb => GTX670 Do you thnik is there any chance to gain more fps? Now with ATI6850 and pc specs below on full screen [ca 6000x1080] i have 30-40 fps My PC specs Cpu i5 2500K @4,4Ghz Ram 8Gb DDR3 Eyefinity 3 x Dell 1920x1080 ATI 6850 1Gb 2x SSD128Gb 1x HDD 1Gb 7200rpm FSX graphics settings Texture filtering trilinear [anisotropic kills ca 15 fps] + antialiasing on