Jump to content

Zuendholz

Members
  • Content Count

    754
  • Donations

    $0.00 
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Zuendholz

  1. Bologna Barcelona - El Prat on my way to KSFO KSFO -> KDEN
  2. So good luck with your testing and new setup. Just look at Copenhagen. If they can manage a similar performance, I would be more than happy.
  3. Yes, get Munich. For me it is the best german airport so far (and my home airport too). I can tell you that T2G captured the feeling of the airport very good. Yeah FT EHAM will be a great thing. I just hope they can optimize the airport and parts of the city for a great VAS footprint and good FPS. Even with the default airport the VAS is very high in EHAM.
  4. Justsim Nice, great one. Very smooth and good looking scenery.
  5. I don't know what A2T EFHK should be? Maybe it is the A-flight version (aerosoft)? I don't find anything via google about A2T. As a lot of you, I'm not willing to install Sceneries with the Airport Controller. It only causes problems for me. I hope the next airports will come without the APC (Malaga, Madeira and Pisa). Otherwise I will pass the ones.
  6. It will convince you. Better wind, visibility and turbolences. No squeezed clouds in the northern countries anymore and finally a great coverage. Here some pictures with AS16 + ASCA.
  7. Hard on FPS? I don't se any performance hit at all. AS16 + ASCA (Global Dynamic) works perfect for me and looks very nice.
  8. SODE can be used for more than just Jetways. They use it for the lightning and other animated stuff. Jetways, like I said, may come.
  9. SODE is indeed working well! There are just no SODE integrated Jetways. They may be come with an update. Otherwise the airport is perfect. Performance is very very good. VAS is fairly good. No problems in P3D v3.3.5 (around 3.1 GB). Settings on my system are extremly high. Flight done with PMDG NGX and AS Airbus.
  10. Can you have a look in the event viewer and tell us, what exactly is crashing the sim?
  11. Thank you Diana. This looks good now. Can't wait to buy AS16 and try ASCA. Will there be a 7-day testversion for both products, like for ASN?
  12. For me this looks good. The strange "satin" look come from the PTA I think, because there is a option for a different cloud shader makes the clouds a bit odd looking. If you compare these to the product page of ASCA, this looks indeed a bit strange. Can some of the Betatesters please post a Thunderstorm without the PTA?
  13. Yes I made a backup. But if you get used to the PTA and the nice look, you don't want to go back. I also noticed not really a hit, I was just curious if there is any proof for a performance hit.
  14. Hi, I really like the PTA, but does the change in the shader files cost performance (HDR, Terrain)? Or does it have zero impact on FPS / VAS? Sometimes there is no hint about it. greetings Phil
  15. Wow love your PTA settings. Will try it too.
  16. Also a big difference between P3D v2 and v3:
×
×
  • Create New...