ljk811

WF’s VHHH was released five years ago. So who exactly is under sales pressure here, desperately trying to prove that their version is the best? WF is an independent creator who has been making scenery since the FSX days, in the same spirit as developers like Flightbeam. For creators like them, scenery development has never really been about pushing flashy marketing — in many cases it started as a passion project outside of their regular work. Most of us aren’t wealthy enthusiasts running i9 CPUs and RTX 5090s. The quality of terminal interiors is not the only metric for judging a scenery. What really matters is the accuracy of the terminal models themselves, the airport ground layout, and the correctness of all the airside facilities. Those things are what actually affect the flying experience. Terminal interiors are just a finishing touch. And honestly, aside from flashy interiors, anyone with eyes can see the difference in quality in the rest of ini’s work.

Evidence? Just look at the airport ground yourself. A bunch of default Asobo assets everywhere. Take a look at the apron lights — they’re basically the default ones. You’ve got eyes, you can go check and compare it yourself. Especially when ini claims they used real-world references for the airport. But if you’re too lazy to look, fine — I can show you some evidence.

Sorry, I got banned by them. Why? Back when MSFS 2024 hadn’t even been released yet and most people were still flying MSFS 2020, they decided to release the A350 only for MSFS 2024. I questioned that decision in their Discord channel, and then I got banned.As it turned out later, they ended up proving themselves wrong.

Other than the “nice-looking interiors,” the rest is a complete mess. Airport facilities are wrong, ground markings are wrong, and even some of the modeling is wrong. And this is supposed to be the quality you get after claiming that “airport staff helped provide references”? Almost everything on the airside is inaccurate. In fact, it’s not even as good as a VHHH scenery released five years ago. At this point it feels like they couldn’t even copy existing work properly. MSFS scenery development seems to have fallen into a weird trend: as long as the terminal interiors look good, everything else can be ignored. But here’s the funny part — both real pilots and sim pilots spend far more time taxiing around the airport than wandering inside the terminal. Yet somehow the ground environment is exactly the part that keeps getting done wrong. Apparently in MSFS these days, as long as the terminal looks great in screenshots, accuracy no longer matters.

Based on the preview images, the runway and taxiway markings are incorrect — VHHH does not follow FAA standards. The high-mast lighting models are wrong as well; they clearly just reused their existing models. The terminal’s color is also inaccurate, which is something a friend of mine in Hong Kong pointed out. Ini’s assembly-line approach to airport development is clearly aimed at people who only care about interiors, getting them to pay for it, while completely neglecting the rest of the actual flying experience.

🤣A $50 cup of coffee is possible in the United States, after all, their congressman Mike Waltz once said during a congressional hearing that the U.S. Air Force purchased a bag of bolts for $90,000.

Pricing will be in line with previous products, but will be finalized upon release. I guess the price is $74.99, and the upgrade price is $49.99

SimAppPro has long supported fsl, and even directly supports msfs2024

I don't know what the cockpit sound of the PW variant of the 200er is like in real life. But for pmdg, the PW variant is too quiet, the sound of my computer fan is louder than it.

I don't know what the cockpit sound of the PW variant of the 200er is like in real life. But for pmdg, the PW variant is too quiet, the sound of my computer fan is louder than it.

Yeah, no one cares about the "dirty word check", it's not in the wishlist, 0 requests, but asobo is wasting time on it

Asobo has nothing to do and adds “profanity check”. How about adding a "politically correct phrase detection" in the next step?

Does this mean that the previous development progress of 350 in msfs2020 was fake? Isn't 350 developed based on msfs2020, but now it tells us that it does not support msfs2020? ! Are you kidding me?

us$77.73