Jump to content

leinsters

Members
  • Content Count

    62
  • Donations

    $0.00 
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

40 Neutral

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Flight Sim Profile

  • Commercial Member
    No
  • Online Flight Organization Membership
    none
  • Virtual Airlines
    No

Recent Profile Visitors

504 profile views
  1. Spent a few hours getting familiar with the systems before my first circuit today. It exceeds my expectations in every way and I am so happy to have a fully modeled Queen of the Skies of this era in flight sim. It really is something I am going to have to learn and get used to as the system are beautifully in depth but not overtly complicates (like the Concorde). There's a wonderful flow to procedures and it is a breath of fresh air to be so deeply connected to every facet of the flight experience. Felis and team have poured love into this addon and it shows. If you're into this type of things you will not be disappointed!
  2. Yep, total disappointment. I've gone back to X-Plane and think I might just stay. Was part of the alpha and beta and I find it inexcusable the flight models are so terrible with default planes. It's a beautiful environment generator that's for sure.
  3. I cannot comment on the new alpha. I can say I will not be updating P3D and I'm not all that pushed about the Vulkan update for X-Plane 😉
  4. No. I'm as much a civilian flier as military. MFSF2020 has a long way to go. The alpha comes out, it works, it looks incredible, I comment on the bugs and issues, am pleased I am contributing 25 years of flight sim experience, at a certain point realize it's not ready for primetime and head back to what currently works really really well.
  5. Since installing my MSFS Alpha I've deleted it and gone back to DCS.
  6. Streaming does not always mean subscription. Anyway, who cares? the market will decide in the end! And besides, we have X-Plane 11 right now and it is awesome! I cannot begin to fathom X-Plane 12.
  7. Back on topic, you should ask yourself what is it that you want? Do you want to simply experience simulated flight today?, how advanced do you want your simulated flight to be? What type of flying do you want to do? And how much do you intend to do it? The new sim won't be out for many months. If you are a casual flyer, then wait. You can get DCS for free, in which the trainer P-51 is amazing, and practice all you want. If you want more indepth aircraft with FMCs, MCDUs etc. then get X-Plane today. MSFS 2020 may not have the level of depth we have grown accustomed to with many 3rd party add-ons. It may even be years before we see PMDG or other high-end developers. X-Plane currently offers amazing value at a low entry price. There are plenty of 3rd party devs for planes and scenery, the freeware scenery community is incredible, and the Zibo mod is in a class of its own. Despite what some people have said here, orthophotos add an incredible amount of depth at no additional charge: Ortho on the left, default autogen on the right: Pretty awesome right?
  8. No. It depends on what you want. X-Plane itself does a pretty nice job. AS as you know just does it with more fidelity 🙂
  9. MSFS 2020 may look stunning and I hope it's as ground breaking as it looks but I highly doubt it will come close to XPlane11 in flight model. Laminar is in a league of its own when it comes to this.
  10. I figured it out.Plugins > Reality XP GTN > GTN 1 > Setting and scroll down until you see North American (Garmin) and choose Jeppeson (Worldwide).
  11. Hi, I can set up a flight plan (EGPH to EGPD) in the trainer, but in the sim (X-Plane) EGPH, EGPD and other waypoints, VORs etc. in the UK are not coming up. Can someone help as I can't find anything in the manual or online. Thanks, Len
  12. I noticed your settings are very high. I fly this area on a 1080 and am getting 30FPS in VR but with much lower settings. In my opinion Drzewiecki Design Seattle is not as well optimized as ORBX True Earth (Southern England) which I can run at higher settings in the London Area. World Objects impacts frames significantly. In this area I'll use medium - or high - if using a GA plane. Lower settings as low as you can tolerate them, and then slowly build them back up.
  13. So true Jon, it has character and it feels alive in every respect.
  14. Out of all the visual clouds for X-Plane I have always reverted to what came out of the box. Like you all, I wish there was something uniformly better, but there isn't. That aside I can easily live without new clouds for another year, it's the weather that matters the most to the aspect of simulated flying. And for me, HiFi are in their own league. This is the same situation we / they were in back in 2004(?) for Flight Simulator. Active Sky's weather engine came out without clouds and it was a complete game changer, so much so that I was never able to fly without it. I am looking forward to that reliability in X-Plane and to enjoying the road of constant development that will come along with it.
×
×
  • Create New...