RVxSpeed

+1.It seems he is giving order to the devs. I have suggestion for him.Why doesn't he hire a developer for himself. & ask them to make an special simulator for him

Sorry,my mistake.You know texting habit

i guess u r mixing eye candy with realism ?

i am a developer myself.i understand the limitation & complexity of a simulator like fsx,p3d or even x plane 10.but, the thing is the developer is asking the user about their upcoming simulator.we are just giving them what we expect.plain & simple.now if u say we r asking too much from the devs.maybe at some point yes. but,that is at the end of the an user expectation.the developer target will be to complete the user expectation or try to come as close as possible.another issue is which the developer already solved that the need of a 64 bit simulator.if we can get pass that 4GB vas barrier there will be more than enough headroom to play with. if u want an example i will give u two distinct example of already developed game which uses full use of modern hardware. first one is euro truck simulator 2.i loved the way they used it.i can max it with my gtx 980 ti still get 60fps with vsync enable so no tearing at all & the simulator is butter smooth. that is with maxed out settings & it's incredibly detailed for a truck simulator. the graphics is not that good.but,there are mods out there to make it look better.even with those enables u can never ever get below 60fps. the 2nd example is not from a simulator but a sandbox game & it's called GTA V.this games level of details,the visibility range & the size of the world is amazing.still average pc games can enjoy 30fps with medium class h/w. so,my question to u.is it really that much to ask to the devs that deliver us a product which we can run at maxed settings with all our beloved addons & still maintain a reasonable min 30 to max 60 fps? i mean it's 2016.i don't think it's that much too ask.even if they fail in the end.we won't complain.if they come closer to accomplish that ,that will be one their best achievement which will put them ahead of any other simulator that is currently existence in the marketplace.& we already + to the devs for finally getting rid of 32 bit.

rather than options. i would like just 2 basic options. 1. simulator presets: this will based on user hardware configuration 2.advance settings: which user can use for further tweaking.if u ask what settings to be exact. i say combine fsx+p3d+xplane 10.when u combine them all there is logically nothing left to customize. & frankly speaking i don't think anyone complained about GUI or settings in the simulator.bcoz all we do is flying. not tweaking the with the settings all day long. what we really expect from u give us a 64 bit fsx(literally) or if u can't do 64 bit just make sure no matter what user do there will be no OOM & user friendly fps.say if any user have intel x series cpu with latest gpu like 1080 he/she should be able to fly with maxed settings with all those complex addons like pmdg,asn,flytampa scenery,orbx with vector!!!!! @60fps. deliver us that & we will be just more than happy.

the exact reason i gave up on xplane. the user interface & controls are not user friendly at all.

hello, but i think it has something to do with latest airac cycle.

ok. just to confirm the aircraft actually performs the hold according to charts or given radials. but, something has triggered the aircraft to not represent the holding pattern as "racetrack" which clearly have been showing on since 1-2 months, instead now it's showing orbital shape. this bug may have got introduced with the latest update or maybe with the navigraph airac cycle.

wow wonderful news for new year.But,can we get a proper change log like with the every LM release? also can you please confirm that the MSVCR120.dll issue solved.bcoz we couldn't find anything with the latest v3.1 release. refer: http://www.prepar3d.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6312&t=113995&start=420 & regarding vas issue.currently the only stressful enough single addon in p3d to get you a 100% OOM is the ORBX FTX Global vector.disable that & u will be thanking for upto 900MB savings.PERIOD. & thanks PMDG that was really unexpected.

hello please update to the latest airac cycle which is 1513. also please check the chart in order to know which sid or star is available http://www.caab.gov.bd/aip/aerodromes/VGHS/vghs.pdf

the ICAO code for DHAKA, has been changed from VGZR to VGHS. Please try that in the fmc & u should get ur desired runway. thank you.