Jump to content

mamu82

Commercial Member
  • Content Count

    109
  • Donations

    $0.00 
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

289 Excellent

About mamu82

  • Rank
    Member

Flight Sim Profile

  • Commercial Member
    Yes
  • Online Flight Organization Membership
    none
  • Virtual Airlines
    No

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. As per @Tuskin38 answer , They seem to have some ideas about freeware in marketplace (there are already some free products actually, but only from 1st party, some library related to 3rd party or some very specific products that modify core files slightly) When thinking about the Marketplace, anyways, we have to think about everything else surprising it, like the cost in bandwidth (we all know how weak the game is!) and the "potential" quality or the potential support issues :in the free world, Devs are less likely to support their products (most simply loose interest in their creation once they have gone out of fashion) A payware developer, because of everything involved being such kind of dev (at least in my country), is more keen to keep products up to date/create more /better products Of course there are several shades of Developers in both worlds
  2. Just came across this 3d in a Google search Ahahahah didn't realize that the first "opening" day was fishy 🐟 (There is a odd reason behind that choice:taxes terms !) ---- Hope that everyone understood the goal of my switch to payware, I have given so much explanation on the add-ons pages in the comments on .to and on the relevant Official msfs forums, + several talk on my (quite large!) discord, so really didn't think about it was required to add the same info in the website shop, if anyone feel it was a scam, my apologies . The overhead required to flip to payware it was massive, believe me! ----- I take this opportunity to announce that,thanks to all of you, the Discord members collaboration, the official forum votes and LOT of people believing that my add-ons were worth, I have finally been officially accepted into the MSFS Marketplace! So hopefully, by the end of the Summer, Xbox user will enjoy my products too --- About the "former freewares", anyone can get in touch to ask for additions/modifications, if the game is able to support them, I will comply 😅 https://discord.com/invite/qmUDwnTmxW
  3. Close 😀 Actually the issue depicted in the screenshot above is due to a incorrect design of the 3d model In order to remove precipitations (rain/snow) and fog inside an open building, in MSFS a specific design technique needs to be used, it is called the "environment occluder". some designer forgot to remove it in distant LODs (or they don't use LODs at all). Therefore, the game doesn exactly what is asked, remove the fog. This is part of the problem, the other issue is related to transparent tinted glass, this still needs a fix from Asobo
  4. You can create a simple Scenery project, an adding all your airplanes model whereever you need How to here:
  5. yep, thats correct, the special objects are simbojects, date based from the 169th to the 175th day of the year, to be precise, expect an update next year to match correct days 😄 <Code>(E:LOCAL DAY OF YEAR, Number) 169 &gt;= (E:LOCAL DAY OF YEAR, Number) 175 &lt;=
  6. I mean in the crop scene, the pilot is walking towards the plane, and you see him from behind, like a third person camera, and in that moment, the airplane is empty. Seems like you can control the pilot movement, going towards the plane, maybe doing some preflight checks and finally enter the plane. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1pg6-QXp783XwyLYEKUv7MZuYM9OJMMiT/view?usp=drivesdk
  7. About the new game There is something interesting I have seen in the video Maybe is just good timing and well scripted But in the crop scene and in the rich people scene, we have the pilot walking towards the aircraft and the rich persons walking on the red carpet towards the aircraft This could be hint of a 3d person mode/walking mode and a passenger boarding feature a la GSX What do you think?
  8. He actually said that the ScenaryGateway itself is ready (the Software is ready) But they have issue with the Xbox website (something like user authentication) (which is odd but the whole msfs franchise is so strickly connected with the Xbox galaxy that I'm refusing to understand any related reasons )
  9. No, it is not possible Simbojects has accces to environment variables or local variables only (afaik) The frequencies are not among them, so that way is not a viable one A really enthusiast simmer can modify his plane and add some L: variable to some switches, so the Simboject visibility can be triggered. But, anyway, we don't have access to the default runway lights (with orbs light effect) as Simbojects, so a workaround is needed for the lights to be visible from a long distance (the same as standard runway lights) The workaround is a multiple Lod object with a colored sphere with its size changing with distance, the more distant, the bigger the sphere. That's a ton of work for PCL.. So yeah, Asobo is the answer, is up to them adding the functionality
  10. You really don't need to remake the entire airport if you want to remove some taxiways lamps, Simply add in the project an Airport object with the same ICAO of the apt you want to mod and use the LightSupport object with its exclude properties to remove the lamps where needed
  11. Thanks both @Dominique_K and @bobcat999 In the official forums there is Wishlist section Maybe, a request there from you guys, if it gets enough votes, can draw more attention (e.g. the fbw and working title masterpieces had so many request that Microsoft HAD to squeeze them in the basic package. My add-on has not their quality,but lot of people like, and I'm disappointed that the Xbox crowd can't enjoy it!)
  12. Wrong, TOS changed, without a notice or approval to NO ONE (developers and users) in autumn 2022 (november 2022 iirc) tos was still ok in August 19th 2022 Proof: https://web.archive.org/web/20220819150640/https://flightsim.to/legal/terms That tos was ok for Developers, cause contained the ability to remove user content avoiding .to transfer their hard work under another (theirs) username. This is the core of the problem Luckily the drama happened, user reacted, Dev reacted, .to reacted, and now the TOS is ok back again ☺️ Hope .to had is lesson and will avoid sudden terms of services changes without express confirmation (illegal in most of the civil world)
  13. This is not related to gaist Believe it or not, at the moment you need to have the Maverick add-on installed for proper wakes
  14. Oh look, the screenshot winner of the week is showing a wonderful Google photogrammetry rip!
×
×
  • Create New...