IniJamir

We don't officially guarantee nor advertise compatibility. That being said, you'll be fine to use the both together. Majority of the custom POIs included in the scenery don't overlap with Orbx London or default Microsoft POIs. There are a couple that may overlap (like Thames Barrier and Cable Car), but you will be able to disable them via iniManager options if you want to run the two together.

Redacted.

Set the time forward into the future instead of backwards. For instance, say it is 11pm, May 28th, but you want to fly in the early morning, you would set the time forward to May 29th, 7am and this would allow you to use live weather and different time. Dragging backwards activates historical weather, dragging forwards activates live weather with custom time. Hope this helps :)

I'll have a look, I remember mentioning this to our team, love the A300

Hi, we are noticing an increasing set of WASM issues relating to A300 following SU5, something we are looking into as we continue to do with A340 and A350. The only thing that makes things more difficult is that we don't have any logging of current like the latter aircraft so we don't get a save or log to look at immediately so we're doing things by route basis. I have yet to have one naturally occur but have been able to reproduce some that the community have shared. I know others that are getting them consistently. If you do come across any WASM crashes, you can add them in detail with the route and actions taken at the time so that we can reproduce them and see what is happening on our end. Thank you. https://forum.inibuilds.com/topic/35422-inibuilds-a300-master-wasm-crash-thread-v108-fs24/

Thanks 🙂

That would be a cool one, it was one of the first airports I chose to fly into when first installing FS2020 back when the BAE-146 had released. This was plane that got me to come over into the commercial flight sim space that is, as prior I was heavily into Il-2 1946-Current Titles as well as Aces High and DCS World; lots of combat flying but the fidelity wasn't enough for me visually until the likes of 2020 and then got XP11 for the Toliss 346. Enough digressing, that would be pretty cool to see and I'd love to see what it's actually supposed to look like instead of the default I had all those years ago 😄

There are a large varieties of liveries that are included, Caledonian Airways is one that is on a list I am forwarding to the team today 🙂

The import STAR/SID option isn't realistic as those are RNP Arrivals which are RNAV1 whereas the INS is an RNAV5 meaning it's too inaccurate to fly the charted path via guidance, we added this function as we know there are users that will fly routes from SID to STAR and then either pick up a VOR for final appr guidance or the ILS itself following a set of Headings to join the Final Appr. IRL they would have to switch to radio navigation and use the guidance from that to fly towards the field on a course, or controller would be required to radar vector aircraft that aren't RNAV capable to the final approach fix where they can join the localizer or fly the visual.

https://forum.inibuilds.com/topic/35986-aircraft-manual-tristar-airliner/

I didn't know we had one of those in the office

Yes we plan on correcting the issue That's not what I said at all, I said that when one change to terrain is made, we have to verify that the entirety of the airport hasn't been affected by a change and if so then a fix has to be applied there; sceneries like JFK and LAX seem to have their underlying terrain data changing more frequently in the sim. Well yeah, when one turns off the Photogrammetry as the user stated above all; of the TIN/DEM data that conflict with the scenery (which are changing mind you) are removed and as such a singular fix can be applied. We design our scenery to be used with PG and have such have to update terrain as DEM data is updated simulator side. Hope this helps 🙂

Hello, The bumps on the runways are known about for JFK, unfortunately as DEM (Digital Elevation Model) data changes overtime, especially in areas that are more unique with their TIN/DEM data as well as the terrain in the location itself; it tends to present itself as bumps and shelves essentially. Applying corrections to one area isn't as simple as just "smoothing out the terrain" as the entire terrain needs to be managed even when changing one area. When we added all the bling and moving people, the terrain data was current for the terrain work done for the scenery, now the data has changed the ramp and runways, virtually everything in the airport space has to be looked over, fixed if needed, and then reverified for changes. Thanks 🙂

The POIs come in a separate pack which is free if you buy HKG, you can then choose to only install the airport and not the POIs

The scenery and POIs for the City work with VHHX Kai Tak from Asobo's 40th Anniversary Edition Update, it also works with SamScene3D barring some buildings that conflict with our POI pack which can be disabled. Hope this helps.

No need, I will pass the issue regarding the stairs to the team. As for the overlay conflicting when selecting the panel state, currently you can select the panel state, wait a few seconds and the original message will clear as the confirmation button isn't missing, it's behind the original menu used to select the panel state, it is known and logged