thepilot

It has some items that not every airlines has, and which are actually not part of the Airbus Normal Procedures checklist. It's very close though. An example: The After Start Checklist has a "Ground Crew Clearance" item.

Does anybody know whether it's possible to merely alter the existing default checklist, rather than creating an entirely new one? Creating your own EFB documents – FenixSim Support Hub

I prefer the tool Touchdown FX, also freeware. It calculates an overall rating based on a range of parameters, not only vertical speed or G force. Among them, touchdown zone is a big one, and on a short runway something I would prefer this over a smooth touchdown, for example. As they say... any landing you can walk away from is a good landing!

They're on a roll... incredible what they're churning out left and right

That's pretty common practise, isn't it?

Same for me, although I am very excited about the upcoming Working Title Embraer Praetor this November. It might be my in roads into the business jet world.

I wish they were in our sim world as well

Speaking of the Fenix... where are the NEOs?

Aside from the E-Jets E1/E2, an ERJ-145 would also be nice. The FeelThere one back in the day wasn't bad at all, and it's a cool little plane for short hops.

Yes... I noticed that too. I am using a fuel factor of minus 8 in Simbrief now for the A320 CFM. That matches up pretty good with the predictions on the INIT B page in the MCDU. In the aircraft itself, I don't change anything.

That is not surprising, there are hardly any (if any at all?) Airbuses left to be done at this point. 😆

This also sounds really promising for future ini developments. Hoping that they will build a high-quality regional jet or prop. Maybe Embraer E190 or a Q400?

What a coincidence, Age of Empires III (also published by Microsoft) just had a DLC called "The Baltic Powers", also featuring the Polish.😀 Would have loved to see the Caribbean or the Aegean Islands/Greece, but any addition is welcome.

Thanks to all the paying beta testers. Might take another look at it when it's at V1.3.9 or thereabouts 😀

Very quickly, and I didn‘t even report a critical error, just a suggestion for improvement.