I would like to hear some opinions on this group who say the flight path and movements of some planes on 911 was unrealistic and there are alot of other things that shows these pilots something is wrong in the official explanation of what happened that day?http://pilotsfor911truth.org/index.htmlDo you think these pilots just want to make money or do they have legitimte grounds to sceptisism of the official story?

I would like to hear some opinions on this group who say the flight path and movements of some planes on 911 was unrealistic and there are alot of other things that shows these pilots something is wrong in the official explanation of what happened that day?http://pilotsfor911truth.org/index.htmlDo you think these pilots just want to make money or do they have legitimte grounds to sceptisism of the official story?

I think these folks are the usual conspiracy theory suspects and don't have a leg to stand on. Every move of those flights has been analyzed from every aspect possible. I know an eyewitness to the pentagon crash whose evidence is as reliable as it gets. Enough already.DJ

Honestly, anytime I've watched this stuff I

Their list of pilots and qualifications are pretty impressive. Seems they are growing as well.Member listhttp://pilotsfor911truth.org/coreMore with photos, some on flight deck in uniform.http://patriotsquestion911.com/pilotsThey anayzed the black box data from the NTSB in which the NTSB claims is from AA77. It doesnt support an impact with the pentagon. The NTSB/FBI refuse to comment. They have recorded calls with both.Here are their press releases for a summary...http://pilotsfor911truth.org/pressrelease.htmlhttp://pilotsfor911truth.org/UA93_Press_Release.htmlI also dont think they're in it just for the money as their work is streaming for free on google...Here is an interesting video with full in depth analysis of the black box for AA77...http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=46...08186&hl=enand here is one for UA93...http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1695850318850681282and here is one proving a 757 cannot navigate the Arlington Topography and obstacles due to excessive G Loading to pull out of such a dive for a 757... based on physics and flight data...http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum//index....showtopic=14670Here is a breakdown of many of the common arguments against their work...http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum//index.php?showtopic=7163Interesting site.

I think these folks are the usual conspiracy theory suspects

I read their misson statement on their homepage and have researched their site. It appears they dont offer theory or place blame at this point in time. But they have found factual holes with the govt story.Why is it that anyone who so much as questions the govt story is labelled a "Conspiracy Theorist"?Its fact the govt story doesnt add up. Not theory.

Deleted.

I know an eyewitness to the pentagon crash whose evidence is as reliable as it gets. Enough already.

And i can post on a forum that i know Santa Claus. But that doesnt make it true.Why not listen to real witnesses filmed on location in Arlington which include Pentagon Police Officers who place the aircraft on a very different path than that required of the physical damage and the govt story....?http://thepentacon.com

Sorry Guys, One shred of genuine evidence is all it takes

Sorry Guys, One shred of genuine evidence is all it takes

They say this or that

Sorry Guys, One shred of genuine evidence is all it takes

They say this or that

I did do the research...reasonable good production values but full of errors....sorry I'm talking mostly about "Loose Change". I recognized I was being swindled...

I did do the research...reasonable good production values but full of errors.

? good production values but full of errors ? What?If I was to ask you what Osama bin Laden is "wanted for", how'd you answer that?The FBI don't want him for 9/11. Why? http://www.fbi.gov/wanted/topten/fugitives/laden.htmRJ

LOLYou call watching "Loose Change" doing research.Enough Said.RJ