October 21, 200916 yr Mad Dog, you are preaching to the choir. We've heard all the pro/con eye candy arguments that folks can conjur up.In addition, we know that for all the calls made for effects files A, B, and C, folks really just want to fly accurately.We included the first animated VIP Passenger in our CX1.0 but included the option to fly without her.We included the very first animated parachute in our Cirrus Series. To date, folks pop the the chute once or twice and barely touch it or comment on its use from that point on.I won't bother you with the hard work and time required to provide that function.We even provided a toggle for SR22 Turbo "Glass Tint" and found that people turn it off more than on.VC Rain will be there but doubt we'll take the time to do icing. I have a staff who need to and must move on to other projects.If we introduce new features or candy it will be at our leisure and on our time frame.At some point you have to make her work, call her done, and release. Eye candy notwithstanding. :(Hello RonThanks for the reply I will still have the CX 2.0 on my list to purchase, with or without VC reflections.If it means that the Eaglesoft team can move on and get working on an updated Ratheon B400 then I will live without the reflections for now :-)
October 21, 200916 yr Hello RonThanks for the replyI will still have the CX 2.0 on my list to purchase, with or without VC reflections.If it means that the Eaglesoft team can move on and get working on an updated Ratheon B400 then I will live without the reflections for now :-)Funny you should mention the BJ400. We were discussing that project recently.There is a certain XLS that needs attention along with CJ1+ 2.0. :(
October 21, 200916 yr Funny you should mention the BJ400. We were discussing that project recently.There is a certain XLS that needs attention along with CJ1+ 2.0. :(Hello RonI really hope you revisit the BJ400, I bought it twice for FS9 and it still gets flown now and then.I would love an updated version for FSX.
October 21, 200916 yr Hello RonI really hope you revisit the BJ400, I bought it twice for FS9 and it still gets flown now and then.I would love an updated version for FSX.BJ400A Extreme 2.0 is planned. When it can happen is another question.The Extreme 2.0 designation is reserved for our FMC equipped aircraft. :(
October 21, 200916 yr BJ400A Extreme 2.0 is planned. When it can happen is another question.The Extreme 2.0 designation is reserved for our FMC equipped aircraft. :(RonAny chance things have changed and the Gulfstreams and Falcons are on your futures list yet? :(
October 21, 200916 yr I haven't visited your pages for three or four years but I remember seeing an image of a Dornier Jet as a 'Coming Soon' project. Did that ever get released?
October 21, 200916 yr RonAny chance things have changed and the Gulfstreams and Falcons are on your futures list yet? :(Gulfstream no. Falcons are a possibility. We really need to clean out the current development hanger prior to any new development. :(I haven't visited your pages for three or four years but I remember seeing an image of a Dornier Jet as a 'Coming Soon' project. Did that ever get released?The Dornier 328 Jet Project is still in the back of the hanger but we hope to get to it within the next three months. :(
October 22, 200916 yr Is there still some sort of issue with Gulfstream corp. not wanting their aircraft "digitally manufactured", or some such nonsense? (I think it'd be good advertising and PR for them but what do I know). Rhett 7800X3D ♣ 96 GB G.Skill Flare ♣ Gigabyte 4090 ♣ Crucial P5 Plus 2TB
October 22, 200916 yr Is there still some sort of issue with Gulfstream corp. not wanting their aircraft "digitally manufactured", or some such nonsense? (I think it'd be good advertising and PR for them but what do I know).Seems to be, I have a GIII and V from FS9, but havent tried to port them over to FSX, looks like I'm going to have to give it a shot eventually.
October 23, 200916 yr Is there still some sort of issue with Gulfstream corp. not wanting their aircraft "digitally manufactured", or some such nonsense? (I think it'd be good advertising and PR for them but what do I know).As far as we know there is.. :(
October 23, 200916 yr Ron, since you are watching this thread, any plans for the new CJ4? :(Not at this time. Waaaayy too much to be done on other projects. :(
October 24, 200916 yr Not at this time. Waaaayy too much to be done on other projects. :(Tks, hopefully down the road, specs are great and the CJ's of yours are my primary planes
Create an account or sign in to comment