May 20, 201115 yr Hi BryanHow come there's never really been any discussion about the Digital Aviation Fokkers?Is the audience just to small still? They are great planesKeep up the great work Lee
May 20, 201115 yr Commercial Member Hi BryanHow come there's never really been any discussion about the Digital Aviation Fokkers?Is the audience just to small still? They are great planesKeep up the great work LeeI'm sure it's a great plane, but each version of FS2Crew takes a HUGE amount of work.I just don't have the resources to do every plane worth doing! Wish I did!I could hire more staff... but this stuff is so technical and specialized that's is almost impossible to find other programmers who could do it.Cheers, B. York FS2Crew Web Site / FS2Crew Facebook Page / FS2Crew Discord
May 29, 201115 yr As long as you do a nice VoiceCommander for the PMDG 737NGX, I'm alright.+1 for "some" abnormal procedures here.I imagine the "simple" ones like single engine and dual engine fire/failure could be done?I know that adding procedures like single hydraulic circuit pressure loss etc are quite complicated and are maybe a little too much to ask, but please consider the above!!Cheers! - Stefan Dittrich
May 29, 201115 yr Commercial Member As long as you do a nice VoiceCommander for the PMDG 737NGX, I'm alright.+1 for "some" abnormal procedures here.I imagine the "simple" ones like single engine and dual engine fire/failure could be done?I know that adding procedures like single hydraulic circuit pressure loss etc are quite complicated and are maybe a little too much to ask, but please consider the above!!Cheers!We'll see... There may be a lot that can be done with the NGX.However, failures like that, due to their complexity, may be a 'separate' module apart from the regular FS2Crew.Cheers, B. York FS2Crew Web Site / FS2Crew Facebook Page / FS2Crew Discord
May 29, 201115 yr We'll see... There may be a lot that can be done with the NGX.However, failures like that, due to their complexity, may be a 'separate' module apart from the regular FS2Crew.Cheers,I can with 100% certainty say that I would purchase it as an "addon" to the normal FS2Crew version... and I'm quite positive that I'm not alone here ;-)After all flying without any failures at all tends to get boring after a while... =P - Stefan Dittrich
May 31, 201115 yr It would be great of the F100/F70 from DA could be looked at, at some stage. I can provide R/W procedures/flows from an EU operator in any level of detail, if this is any use. Please do consider it :-)
February 22, 201214 yr Hellosomething planned for the sstsim concorde fs9 and projeckt tupolev tu-154 ? Edited February 22, 201214 yr by emrahkaran
February 22, 201214 yr Commercial Member Hi,I'm sure they're great planes, but nothing planned for them.Cheers, B. York FS2Crew Web Site / FS2Crew Facebook Page / FS2Crew Discord
March 12, 201214 yr BryanGreat work on the NGX version ... love it, also have the J41 version, a customer here for the Flight Sim Labs Concorde X if you ever make one ... maybe you should start a pole to see what people want (you might have done that but ive not seen it ... sorry if you have!).Keep up the fab work, FS2Crew is one of the most enjoyable parts of the whole flight sim experance, simmers who dont have it really are missing out.Thank youRich
Create an account or sign in to comment