Thanks for the info Ryan.And in all honesty, after doing some flying with the Wilco/feelthere ERJ v2, I was just about to plant that plane in my virtual hanger and let it collect virtual dust. Now that I see this issue, just adds on top of that.

Thanks for the info Ryan.And in all honesty, after doing some flying with the Wilco/feelthere ERJ v2, I was just about to plant that plane in my virtual hanger and let it collect virtual dust. Now that I see this issue, just adds on top of that.

That's actually not a bad plane, I like it best out of all the stuff they have. (I'm talking about the 135/145, not the 175/195)

That's actually not a bad plane, I like it best out of all the stuff they have. (I'm talking about the 135/145, not the 175/195)

Me too Ryan, LOVE the v2 145, when I want to fly an RJ its usually what I choose.I would never deprive myself of some of FT's stuff just over a nit like this btw.Its NOT destroying DLL's, its a config file.... ya, its really outrageous that itsnot been fixed in all this time, but just install, fix it, and go fly :(

I never noticed this, does it occur with all Feelthere products or just Wilco published ones?The ERJ v2 is 'alright'. It's good enough for an RJ, but it has too many missing features in my view. Still, it appears to be the only modern short range aircraft available until the NGX comes out.

The ERJ v2 is 'alright'. It's good enough for an RJ, but it has too many missing features in my view. Still, it appears to be the only modern short range aircraft available until the NGX comes out.

I had the same feeling about it as you, until the last few flights I did I tried to hand fly the thing, and that is where its true faults shine. There is no way the real airplane handles like that. In some cases, it acually defies the laws of physics in how it behaves in FSX, especially when you starting changing the thrust on the thing. Its almost like they got things literally backwards.

Thanks for the info Ryan.And in all honesty, after doing some flying with the Wilco/feelthere ERJ v2, I was just about to plant that plane in my virtual hanger and let it collect virtual dust.  Now that I see this issue, just adds on top of that.

What?? If you have been flying the plane without issue .. this problem doesn't apply to you.

That's actually not a bad plane, I like it best out of all the stuff they have. (I'm talking about the 135/145, not the 175/195)

I agree. This is a very good aircraft and I've never had any problem with the install. If some people have problems, it must be something about their system.I don't think anyone has a more complex environment within their dll.xml file than I do. Yet Wilco's ERJ v.2 and EJet v.2 installed on my computer without any corruption at all.Flightsim Developers (FSD) refused to give me any support for an aircraft that I purchased from them because they said I had too many aircraft and addons installed in FSX and my dll.xml file was too complex. Yet Wilco's aircraft (including the PIC737) has installed and operated perfectly. I fly them and enjoy them very much.I loooove all of PMDG's aircraft simulations and (without exception) no one surpasses them in quality, accuracy and fidelity in simulation, yet PMDG cannot make every single aircraft that I would like to fly in FSX, so we just have to have other developers that are willing to pick up the slack and make other quality simulations that we can enjoy.I am satisfied that Feelthere has done a very good job with the ERJv.2 and the EJetv.2. No one is at the level of PMDG, but every car doesn't have to be a Cadillac.You have to consider that thousands of simmers are successfully installing these Wilco/Feelthere aircrafts in their computers without any issues. Problems like this are most likely caused by your system and not by the simulation addon.Bob Young

Hey everyone, I don't post here, only read (actually was surprised to see I was registered), but I have a question about this too.I have the Wilco Airbus V.1 for FSX, but I don't have it installed. I'd like to use it, since the only other option for an A320 is the Airbus X (verrryyy simple), but I'm wondering what all is affected by this corruption Wilco causes. Are you guys saying the products actually corrupt a Windows DLL file? Or are you saying it ONLY corrupts the dll.xml file of FSX. I've seen both terms "DLL file" and "DLL.XML" file used. Also, let's say I back up my DLL.XML file, and install a Wilco product. Is there a way to fix the file so everything is functional again WITH the addon?

Guys,I decided to write a much more comprehensive document at our support knowlegebase on this tonight - inspired in part by this thread:http://support.precisionmanuals.com/KB/a92/dllxml-information-and-troubleshooting.aspxThis should allow you to solve 99% of dll.xml related problems.

Guys,I decided to write a much more comprehensive document at our support knowlegebase on this tonight - inspired in part by this thread:http://support.preci...leshooting.aspxThis should allow you to solve 99% of dll.xml related problems.

Thanks, Ryan...this is really very helpful.

I have just finished installing all my fsx because of the unininstall of a wilco plane. If only I had seen this before... :(

Can't fault the workmanship on the v2 of the 50-seat erjs they made. They are actually pretty accurate system wise. You can do everything with the systems that you would normally do on everyday ops and expect the same outcome as the real thing...for the most part. There are some quirks here and there but none are showstoppers for the simmer who doesn't really know the plane. The cockpit sounds are straight on which is the way it should be. When i say cockpit, i am not talking about the apu or engines. Juat the gpws and clcik sounds and the aural warning unit. So to cut to the chase...to say this package is utter crap is a ill advised comment.

So to cut to the chase...to say this package is utter crap is a ill advised comment.

I disagree, obviously. The number of unclickable switches is quite high, the VC is rubbish, very hard to see the runway on approach without having to change the view point. Not easy for us without TrackIR to keep hitting space+shift and space+bs to get the eyepoint where we can actually see the TDZ, the nightlighting in the plane is uttercrap, I love how when you turn on the packs the cabin can go from a temperature of 35 degrees F to 74 degrees F in about 3 seconds flat, the lights on the plane are broken, they admit this but opt to not fix it, the plane handles like one of those styrofoam glide planes I had when I was a kid. The only saving grace in the plane is that the FMS is pretty well done. Compare it to a PMDG product, the Maddog MD80, the Level D 767, then add the mess this whole thread talks about, then yes, the ERJV2 is utter crap. I still fly it because it is the only regional jet add on I own for my AvA flights, but it is by far my least favorite add-on aircraft.

It handles fine to me. As it turns out, most of the unclickable switches are actually clickable, they just have to be right clicked first.

The plane handles comparatively to how the real one does. Its a pretty docile plane and extremely sensitive to roll inputs. Speeds are mostly spot on. The only thing I have noticed is that in FSX when you put the gear down, there isn't the pronounced yaw that you get in the real thing. Ill agree with you on the lighting. The VC is well done in my opinion. Its not perfect but its well done. When it comes to the switches, I can use every switch with the exception of the stall warning test switches and some on the mfd that would normally be used in everyday ops. They stated that the add-on wasn't supposed to have a failure simulator. In that case, not EVERY switch would be needed. When it comes to the view point in the VC. Its actually not that unrealistic. You sit pretty high in the real cockpit and you have to look down to see the PFD. However its the same as looking down when driving at your speedometer. As we both know though, looking down in FSX can be somewhat of a task. So I think that the viewpoint issue is an FSX thing. Comparing it to a PMDG add-on is like comparing apples to oranges. The markets that each company advertises to is totally different.