Caribbean Airlines Jet Crashes in Guyana and Splits in Two A Caribbean Airlines jet en route from New York crashed in Guyana today and split in two upon hitting the runway, but none of the 163 people on board were killed.About 100 people received medical attention for injuries, which included broken legs and scratches. Several passengers are still hospitalized, local officials said.There appears to have been no fire after the crash, allowing passengers to exit the plane safely. People said they scrambled out through the emergency exit and over the wings.The plane overshot the 7,400-foot (2,200-meter) runway at Cheddi Jagan International Airport, crashing through a chain-link airport fence and ending up on a dirt road around the airport. The plane broke in two just before reaching a 200-foot ravine.There were no emergency vehicles immediately available. It was 1:30 a.m. and dark and rainy outside."The first thing I think of when I see an accident like this is they landed too fast, too long down the runway or they hydroplaned and certainly when there is water on the runway that is one of the principle things you think about," said ABC News aviation consultant John Nance.One passenger said a taxi driver actually came up and took her to the terminal, but he wanted $20 for the ride. Guyana's airport remained closed Saturday morning as officials conducted investigations. Local officials have asked the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) to assist in the investigation. The plane was a U.S.-made Boeing 737-800, so the NTSB and the Federal Aviation Administration are expected to head down to the crash site to assist to try to figure out what went wrong.Sources in Guyana say they are ruling out weather as a factor in the crash. The plane's black boxes have been recovered, which will help to figure out the cause of the crash."Investigators are first going to consider hydroplaning, where you are going so fast on water because it is a wet runway you don't have any breaking effectiveness. This can also be exacerbated by landing too far down the runway or too fast," said Nance."No question when you are looking at accidents on the backside of the clock one of the key questions is was the crew tired either directly or cumulatively tired over time. These things can be very important in figuring out exactly what happened," Nance added."We are very, very grateful that more people were not injured," said President Bharrat Jagdeo, who came to the crash site before dawn."It was serious and all the plane practically broke in two, so we should be very grateful for that," said Jagdeo.This crash is apparently one of the few serious accidents involving Caribbean Airlines, which is based in Trinidad, according to the Associated Press.Accidents in which planes run off the side or end of a runway are the most common type of runway mishap. About 30 occur every year worldwide, most on landing.It happened in Jamaica in 2009 and Little Rock Arkansas in 1999, where 11 died. Luckily most of these accidents are not fatal.Source: http://abcnews.go.co...ory?id=14196149

I wonder why the flaps/slats are retracted.

That's a good question A.J. I noticed that as well. Ray Lemus

The aircraft looks so pitiful, with its nose pointed in the ground. Almost like it is ashamed and saying "I'm sorry".

At A.JI wonder that to, if they exited over the wings, doesn't that require a full flap setting? I guess jumping from the wing to the ground is a small price to pay after having to pay $20 ...It never struck me until our flight got cancelled that a jet crashed, no warnings nothing, but I couldn't find the runway from the angle I was at.

Interestingly, look at the Nacelles of the engines. That's a 737-200... not a -800. _O.K._

Interestingly, look at the Nacelles of the engines. That's a 737-200... not a -800. _O.K._

Nope, an -800. The nacelles got crunched a little in the crash. Further proof of NG-ness is the deployed reverser sleeves.

Nope, an -800. The nacelles got crunched a little in the crash. Further proof of NG-ness is the deployed reverser sleeves.

Correct the 737-200 has clam-shells . hmm i too want to know why the flaps where retracted.. Pilots could have attempted to take off again realized they had no room and slammed on the breaks

maybe the touchdown was hard, and they bounced. The pilots tried to thrust up to get back in the air auto brakes disengaged, and then they tried to reverse thrust and it wasn't available because engines where not idle probably all happened in a split second...all complete conjecture on my part. So glad nobody was hurt. Nothing but respect to the real pilots unlike myself. Guthrie Z

Hmmm... that bird is pretty beat up... Guess the Boeing AOG-team will have a big job with this one Maybe on of us (future) NGX pilots can use the cockpit section to build a sim It's very strange the slats / flaps are in the full up position. Maybe they had some hydraulic failures and were not able to use the alternate extend system?

Glad no one died, and a sad end to such a fine aircraft, but those pilots are looking for jobs now.