Sorry guys, for the long start up time, because of IRS Alignment (10min),but that´s the way I always have it....EKCH Copenhagen Rwy 22L, SID NEXEN1FLEPA Palma de Mallorca Rwy 24R, STAR LUNIK1PSAS LN-TUD, 737-700NGX with full pax (146)Video time-Cold and Dark startup with taxi (~16 min)-Takeoff (~7min)-No Cruise-Aprroach and landing (~16 min)For best quality use 1080p (HD)/ Leffe

Great video only thing i missed was your pointer was trying to follow the switches selections

Great video only thing i missed was your pointer was trying to follow the switches selections

Yeah Pete, discovered that after had taken the video.I´m kinda new to this Fraps thing. How do you get the mouse pointer in the video?/ Leffe

Hi Leffe,Very nice!Small pointer though: try and fly the airplane. after takeoff you rolled about 5 degrees to the right. Also on approach it seems the aircraft was flying you instead of the oppersite. Hardly any flare at all.Kind regards,

Hi Leffe,Very nice!Small pointer though: try and fly the airplane. after takeoff you rolled about 5 degrees to the right. Also on approach it seems the aircraft was flying you instead of the oppersite. Hardly any flare at all.Kind regards,

Thanks! yes, one makes some misstake now and then.Lucky for me that it´s only a sim ....

Leif,great vid! What framerates do you get with this specs? Also on very busy airports?David

Leif,great vid! What framerates do you get with this specs? Also on very busy airports?David

David, today I never look at the Framerates no more. I remember however, I had some 18 FPS as lowest,when approaching KJFK and KDFW (FSDT) with 50 % A1 when I got FSX in august.As long as it feels fluids (the most important) and in FSX I´ve read (long time ago) that it´s kinda fluid down to some 8-10 FPS.So FSX is not at all as the FS9 version, when it becomes to Framerate I guess.I also have FPS Limiter locked at 30 FPS and unlimited in FSX./ Leffe

David, today I never look at the Framerates no more. I remember however, I had some 18 FPS at lovestwhen approaching KJFK and KDFW (FSDT) with 50 % A1 when I got FSX in august.As long as it feels fluids (the most important) and in FSX I´ve read (long time ago) that it´s kinda fluid down to some 8-10 FPS.So FSX is not at all as the FS9 version, when it becomes to Framerate I guess.I also have FPS Limiter locked at 30 FPS and unlimited in FSX./ Leffe

You´re right. I sometimes look at the FPS, though FSX is really smooth running - and when I see "only" 15-20 FPS, my mind tells me that this is very bad, which is not right. I think it is the best thing not to look at the FPS when your Sim runs fluently. I totally agree with you.David

Only comments I have are that I couldn't stand having those red a/craft labels above each AI nor to have the green strip with the ASE info scrolling across every few minutes. To me it totally spoils the realism. Just my opinion. You obviously get a good smooth performance and the video looked good in 1080p.Do you use TrackIR? You seem to be able to look at more of the overhead at once than I can, yet you have a 0.7 zoom whereas I have 0.5. So what am I doing wrong?Iain Smith

Nice video! Hahaha, but the reg of the plane TUD, means cry in danish, among other words, that means the same! Hehe, Got to be a dame that came up with that reg! ;-) Jakob

Nice video! Hahaha, but the reg of the plane TUD, means cry in danish, among other words, that means the same! Hehe, Got to be a dame that came up with that reg! ;-)Jakob

LOL.....but I guess you ain´t quite right about that Jakob. If I still remember my old Danish (moved when I was 6)it´s spelled TUDE....or isn´t it? (could be wrong tough...)/ Leffe

Only comments I have are that I couldn't stand having those red a/craft labels above each AI nor to have the green strip with the ASE info scrolling across every few minutes. To me it totally spoils the realism. Just my opinion. You obviously get a good smooth performance and the video looked good in 1080p.Do you use TrackIR? You seem to be able to look at more of the overhead at once than I can, yet you have a 0.7 zoom whereas I have 0.5. So what am I doing wrong?Iain Smith

I have TrackIR, but didn't used it, in that specific flight Iain.I have my preedefined settings for EZCA to zoom 0.70. But the most important things however,is to have the same zoom for all settings even if some like 0,50 or 0,60, otherwise it will be no smoothness, when changing between them.However in that flight I used a mix of Hat switch on my YOKE and my preedefined settings./ Leffe

LOL.....but I guess you ain´t quite right about that Jakob. If I still remember my old Danish (moved when I was 6)it´s spelled TUDE....or isn´t it? (could be wrong tough...)/ Leffe

Hehe, Well yes that is true also, but in Danish you can say "tud tud", as in cry or as in "cry baby". Any Danes that Can back me up on this hehe. Not that I'm Offended hehe! Leffe where did you move to? :-)Jakob

Hehe, Well yes that is true also, but in Danish you can say "tud tud", as in cry or as in "cry baby". Any Danes that Can back me up on this hehe. Not that I'm Offended hehe!Leffe where did you move to? :-)Jakob

....the other side of Öresund....LOL/Leffe

Hehe, Well yes that is true also, but in Danish you can say "tud tud", as in cry or as in "cry baby". Any Danes that Can back me up on this hehe.

I had a friend call me that the other day, actually. On that note, I can only really read Danish, as it's similar enough to Norwegian. Ask me to speak it, or listen to it? Not a chance! Then again, the Norwegian I speak grates on the nerves of most "true" Norwegians, so they probably don't like listening to me a whole heck of a lot either.Most of it is the soft 'd's. I can't get over them: 'hedder'. There are 'd's in there that should make it like "header" på engelsk, but it almost sounds a little more like "hiller." Weird if you ask me...Then again, like I said earlier, anyone from Oslo would probably think the same of how I speak Norsk.