FLIGHT has ATC - YES or NO ?

[SpiritFlyer 987]

Not true !!That is all I can say.Fred.

Agreed, not true.

[flyerboy 114]

hahEveryone complains about the FSX ATC, now suddenly want it in flight? I wonder if it will even have AI aircraft?

[alainneedle1 97]

Not true !!That is all I can say.Fred.

Agreed, that is all he can say.

[P47D 5]

If you look at the planes from A2A simulations then look at the aircraft in Flight there is a HUUUUGE difference. MS has never proven they could do an airplane right no reason to think their will be any better experience than the Beta. Sad ;-( With no 3rd party support why would anyone switch from FSX.No ATC is so unrealistic.

[Super Six-Four 5]

meaningless NDA

Good thing you're not a beta tester I guess...

[JonRD463 146]

Who need default ATC ? ATC was totally crap in FSX, I can't fly without Radar Contact addon. Providing they kept the FSX AI engine which I believe, a SDK will provide us with quality ATC addon. There is no need for default fancy stuff (planes, etc), we just need the platform, and we'll pay for addons through the store.

You're right. Hopefully, the folks at Radar Contact, or The PFE guys can get started on a version for Flight.Oh, wait...

[Squishy 0]

I don't know I uninstalled the beta before even trying

Edited January 15, 2012 by Squishy

[Jayskits 0]

it would be easy for them to add an ATC addon like any other functionality.

From a source code programming perspective, is this true? Is it easy to make a really good add on ATC? Maybe the guys who are currently writing Radar Contact 5 can answer this.