December 18, 201213 yr Love this bird so far!! Want me to take a screenshot of somehting? Just ask! Enjoy
December 18, 201213 yr Both the scenery and Sharklets look wonderful! Aerosoft did an excellent job with the visual model of the first version of the Airbus X. It only seems to have improved with this extended edition.
December 18, 201213 yr Nice shots The lack of wing flex is still fairly disappointing! Cheers,John TavendaleTextures by Tavers - https://www.facebook.com/texturesbytavers
December 18, 201213 yr Nice shots The lack of wing flex is still fairly disappointing! Complain to Airbus, because the original doesn't have it either... Great shots even though i wouldn't touch an AFR livery :ph34r: CASE: Fractal Terra Silver CPU: AMD R5 7800X3D 5.0Ghz RAM: 32GB DDR5 6000 GPU: nVidia RTX 4070 Ti SUPER · SSDs: Samsung 990 PRO 2TB M.2 PCIe · PNY XLR8 CS3040 2TB M.2 PCIe · VIDEO: LG-32GK650F QHD 32" 144Hz FREE/G-SYNC · MISC: Thrustmaster TCA Airbus Joystick + Throttle Quadrant · MSFS2024 · Windows 11
December 18, 201213 yr Complain to Airbus, because the original doesn't have it either... Great shots even though i wouldn't touch an AFR livery :ph34r: . There is a degree in wing flex on the real airplane.... As you can see here: http://www.jetphotos.net/viewphoto.php?id=7505489 Cheers,John TavendaleTextures by Tavers - https://www.facebook.com/texturesbytavers
December 18, 201213 yr Looks pretty nice (not got it yet). From the pictures I don't see what the contention some people have with the VC (in other Extended topics), that's what you would get with a new Airbus, And easy to clean too lol. It's not a boeing. Next we'll hear that this... Doesn't look or handle like this..... There's probably a good reason for that , but can't quiet put my finger on it, lol
December 18, 201213 yr There is a degree in wing flex on the real airplane.... Yes. While the A320 seems to have relatively stiff wings, they still spring around during turbulence. Here is a video of an extremely turbulent A320 approach and anding. Begin at 9:30 to view the large inputs and wing oscillations.
December 18, 201213 yr Looks like a real winner for Aerosoft, they seem to have produced enough of the A32x experience to satisfy most. Re wingflex I did read that they excluded it because the required coding would impact performance and was not worth the effort to simulate the A32x (relatively) minimal flex. I get that but still, somehow board stiff wings on a modern model still feels so...fs98 , especially since so many free and payware models have had it since fs9. Anyway, well done Aerosoft, and nice VC shots btw! Regards, Mark
December 18, 201213 yr Looks nice, the original did too... until it dug into the ground nose first just short of the runway threshold. Not being outrageous in saying that I refuse to pay another sum of money to fix that problem. But excellent set of screenshots well done I love the last two. I hope that the sharklets become popular when they are introduced as I think they look magnificent. Tim HeptinstallAirports I have been to: Doncaster Robin Hood Airport EGCN, East Midlands (EGNX), Manchester (EGCC), Tenerife South/Reina Sofia Airport (GCTS), Fuerteventura Airport (GCFV), New York John F Kennedy International Airport (KJFK)Aircraft I have travelled on: 737-800 (Thomson), 737-800WL (Thomson, Ryanair), 757-200 (Thomson, Thomas Cook), 757-200WL (Thomson, Thomas Cook, American Airlines), De Havilland Dragon Rapide (Classic Wings G-AIYR). Currently studying Aeronautical Engineering at Sheffield Hallam University (UK). Applying for medicals to start PPL soon. Message me if you would like to share stories/progress.
December 19, 201213 yr I hope that the sharklets become popular when they are introduced as I think they look magnificent. I agree—they look so much better than the rather-rigid wingtip fences of the original A320.
Create an account or sign in to comment