June 5, 201313 yr Enjoy, this flight was so much fun... No Filter, or Extra Scenery Thanks for looking, Chris
June 5, 201313 yr WOW!!! Those look so Realistic!! Bravo!!! 100%75%50%d8a34be0e82d98b5a45ff4336cd0dddc Patrick
June 5, 201313 yr Author What 777 is this? It's ramzesses 777-200LR professional and it's incredibly realistic PMDG quality or better in my opinion
June 5, 201313 yr Realistic? With the engines off while in mid air? CASE: Fractal Terra Silver CPU: AMD R5 7800X3D 5.0Ghz RAM: 32GB DDR5 6000 GPU: nVidia RTX 4070 Ti SUPER · SSDs: Samsung 990 PRO 2TB M.2 PCIe · PNY XLR8 CS3040 2TB M.2 PCIe · VIDEO: LG-32GK650F QHD 32" 144Hz FREE/G-SYNC · MISC: Thrustmaster TCA Airbus Joystick + Throttle Quadrant · MSFS2024 · Windows 11
June 5, 201313 yr Author Realistic? With the engines off while in mid air? Do you own it? Cause last time I checked the engines have to be running for it to fly
June 5, 201313 yr It's ramzesses 777-200LR professional and it's incredibly realistic PMDG quality or better in my opinion PMDG: often imitated, but never duplicated Jeff Bea I am an avid globetrotter with my trusty Lufthansa B777F, Polar Air Cargo B744F, and Atlas Air B748F.
June 5, 201313 yr Author Haha I see I have started a war by saying that, fine I take back my previous statement, and issue a new statement that this 777 is In a class of its own
June 6, 201313 yr Outstanding shots! They look almost real (except for the engines which do indeed look like they're off -_- , but if NaMcO hadn't said that I woudn't have recognized) Florian
June 6, 201313 yr Author Haha ya I know exactly what you mean with the engines, when you shutdown your plane in xplane and load up the replay it keeps the engines off
June 9, 201312 yr It's ramzesses 777-200LR professional and it's incredibly realistic PMDG quality or better in my opinion It may be good, but it's not better than PMDG will be as it doesn't have a prototypical cockpit for a 200LR 1. A fictitious TO/GA button on the MCP 2. It has standard standby gauges as would be found on the 200 or 200ER. The 200LR should have the ISFD gauge. 3. The EFB is not modeled like the real one. Even the CS777 got this one right!!! Edit: Also why does Ramzesses think passengers exit from the right on the 777? Thanks Tom My Youtube Videos! http://www.youtube.com/user/tf51d
June 9, 201312 yr Author It may be good, but it's not better than PMDG will be as it doesn't have a prototypical cockpit for a 200LR 1. A fictitious TO/GA button on the MCP 2. It has standard standby gauges as would be found on the 200 or 200ER. The 200LR should have the ISFD gauge. 3. The EFB is not modeled like the real one. Even the CS777 got this one right!!! Edit: Also why does Ramzesses think passengers exit from the right on the 777? Ya tf51 I understand where your coming from, what makes it a better aircraft in my opinion is 1. the systems for the most part are realistic, aside from a couple tiny things that don't matter to me like a TO/GA button on the MCP and an EFB you never use because you usually have the charts on your knee anyways. PMDG also has a fake TO/GA button on the MCP 2. Coupled with flight dynamics xplane has, you don't feel like your flying something on rails. Also I know this is not important to most but the fact that they took the time to model the whole entire plane, instead of just the cockpit. So you feel more immersion in the plane instead of feeling like your flying just a cockpit. I know they don't model the entire plane due to lack of resources however as the hobby moves into the future MSFS is showing its age and if I were to recommend an updated platform and realistic plane it would be ramzesses 777, because sooner or later we are all gonna have to face the music that MSFS is an aging system and can no longer compete with newer products. Chris
Create an account or sign in to comment