December 27, 201312 yr Its ready. Anyone bought? Yes I bought it, but I can only try it out in a week. But the first images and opinions are really promising: http://forum.aerosoft.com/index.php?/topic/77152-czst-stewart-erschienen/#entry550407 Easy installation, top quality and top performance! Karsten Schubert
December 27, 201312 yr Looks great, like others said, I wish there were 10x the devs making scenery at a rate like Orbx does. I will probably get this once I see some initial impression performance wise.
December 27, 201312 yr I'm very impressed by the screenshots. Will I buy it? No. Because I don't like to pay for one airport somwhere... What is still missing are regional sceneries with some nice flights between the airports. Gesendet von meinem GT-I9100 mit Tapatalk 2
December 27, 201312 yr I'm very impressed by the screenshots. Will I buy it? No. Because I don't like to pay for one airport somwhere... What is still missing are regional sceneries with some nice flights between the airports. Well, Stewart really has a reason. If someone already owns the old Tony Curtis Sceneries Inner Passage, Final Frontier and Canadian Rockies there are already several interesting locations available with a very good default scenery. Karsten Schubert
December 27, 201312 yr Well, Stewart really has a reason. If someone already owns the old Tony Curtis Sceneries Inner Passage, Final Frontier and Canadian Rockies there are already several interesting locations available with a very good default scenery. A bit off-topic, but do those sceneries work with the HD mesh V2? -
December 27, 201312 yr Moderator A bit off-topic, but do those sceneries work with the HD mesh V2? I downloaded it a few hours ago and yes it works fine with the mesh, you just need to make sure their scenery has a higher priority.
December 27, 201312 yr A bit off-topic, but do those sceneries work with the HD mesh V2? In general yes, if you have no problem if some buildings stand in a street or that you find sometimes a hangar for waterplanes on dry land. Otherwise the main problems are low resolution textures on buildings and sometimes on the ground (many buildings still use LIT Textures). So stewart is an extremly good replacement for the Curtis Stewart in the first image, while you have a very big number of available airports around you. Together with the HD Mesh which gives the canyons and rivers a big boost it is a very interesting area. If Tony Curtis would have added locations north of Paya we would have even a connection to Aerosofts Anchorage Airport for small planes. Karsten Schubert
December 27, 201312 yr Well, Stewart really has a reason. If someone already owns the old Tony Curtis Sceneries Inner Passage, Final Frontier and Canadian Rockies there are already several interesting locations available with a very good default scenery. I have those you mentioned and will have a second look at it. Gesendet von meinem GT-I9100 mit Tapatalk 2
December 28, 201312 yr In general yes, if you have no problem if some buildings stand in a street or that you find sometimes a hangar for waterplanes on dry land. Otherwise the main problems are low resolution textures on buildings and sometimes on the ground (many buildings still use LIT Textures). So stewart is an extremly good replacement for the Curtis Stewart in the first image, while you have a very big number of available airports around you. Together with the HD Mesh which gives the canyons and rivers a big boost it is a very interesting area. If Tony Curtis would have added locations north of Paya we would have even a connection to Aerosofts Anchorage Airport for small planes. Well, low-res buildings is still better than no buildings at all B) Depending on how many buildings and hangars are misplaced, it should be possible to fix it yourself using WED (I'm a total X-Plane newbie, but I've added excludes and re-positioned objects before, it's actually not that difficult). -
Create an account or sign in to comment