I wanted to test P3D v2 and I definitely have a DX11 video card

 

How did you manage to accomplish this?

"...to accomplish..." What?

 

Greets

Ban in 5,4,3,2,1 ....

 

Wow, I'm replying to a deleted post!

Edited November 12, 201312 yr by firehawk44
Removed hidden post.

Why?

"...to accomplish..." What?

 

Greets

An installed version of P3DV2 to test it with?

I'm sorry, you're about to be banned. If you have a copy of Prepar3D 2.0, then that means it's either pirated, or you're a beta-tester and breaking the NDA.

Edited November 12, 201312 yr by firehawk44
Removed hidden post.

I did a little asking around and deleted my initial post again.

ThX for your note.

like a judge telling a jury they didnt hear that last satement.

What I meant is that Prepar3D is not mainstream in the way jabloomf1230 described it (like Call of Duty: Ghosts and Battlefield 4). It's meant for those who are serious with flight simulation or want to train.

 

Boy, talk about misconstruing what I wrote, as I never said that P3d was a main stream video game like COD or BF4. P3d is mainstream flight simming, because what's left of this market is mostly people that take flight simulation very seriously. MS's original target audience for FSX was the same as it was for other PC video games. Most of that audience has disappeared and what is left are hard core simulation freaks: the RL pilots (like me), the student pilots and people that would love to fly a plane in RL, but are limited by time, money or age. I see no difference in the way that any of those groups use FSX or P3d.

I did a little asking around and deleted my initial post again.

ThX for your note.

Chris, not to worry. Since I never saw your (now hidden) post, there's no offense for me to have to officially see... :LMAO:

I suggest it isn't to Lockheed Martin who needs to knows "which side its bread's buttered"  to coin a phrase.

 

You care too much about suggesting what LM thinks or doesn't think. You've made your point by now.