Jump to content

Sign in to follow this  
el_kab0ng

Which manufacturers won't let sim designers produce copies?

Recommended Posts

I know there's been some controversy surrounding Gulfstream and sim designers, but what other manufacturers are on the no-no list? I'm guessing due to the lack of Bombardier biz jets, they make the list of off-limits AC for designers? I'd kill to see a decent Global 6000 hit the market.

Share this post


Link to post

Honda requested that FlightGear to took down a model of its Honda Jet.


Gerry Howard

Share this post


Link to post

Theres a nice Challenger 300 for X-Plane, so I doubt that


-Chris Crawford

-ATP/MEL

- B737 / B777 / B-727 / EMB-145 / LR-JET

 

Share this post


Link to post

Why do these companies care?


David Womacks CFI,CFII,MEI

Copilot: Captain have you ever flown a 777 before?

Captain:Nope,but we got a strong tail wind and the bar in Hong Kong stays open till 5am, so lets kick the tires, light the fires and, get the hell outta here.

 

Share this post


Link to post

Bombardier evidently has no objection - there are numerous Lear models available for FSX, including the default Lear 45, and Aerosoft is producing the CRJ 700/900.


Jim Barrett

Licensed Airframe & Powerplant Mechanic, Avionics, Electrical & Air Data Systems Specialist. Qualified on: Falcon 900, CRJ-200, Dornier 328-100, Hawker 850XP and 1000, Lear 35, 45, 55 and 60, Gulfstream IV and 550, Embraer 135, Beech Premiere and 400A, MD-80.

Share this post


Link to post

Why do these companies care?

Oddly enough, most of them don't care. It's their bloody-minded corporate lawyers who care...

  • Upvote 1

Fr. Bill    

AOPA Member: 07141481 AARP Member: 3209010556

Interests: Gauge Programming - 3d Modeling for Milviz

Many Thanks to All That Donated To Our Server Drive!

Share this post


Link to post

When I ran a company, it was the Directors and Managers who took that sort of decision - the lawyers were there to give advice.

In reality there's often no advantage to the company, and so it's simpler to say no rather than to waste time  getting in further involvement.

  • Upvote 1

Gerry Howard

Share this post


Link to post

And that is why my payback is to simply not purchase their products :P

  • Upvote 1

Waleed N

Share this post


Link to post

Err....how many Gulfstreams have you bought from Grumman/General Dynamics?


Gerry Howard

Share this post


Link to post

The "tongue out" emoticon is there for a reason, Gerry.

  • Upvote 2

Christopher Low

UK2000 Beta Tester

FSBetaTesters3.png

Share this post


Link to post

Oddly enough, most of them don't care. It's their bloody-minded corporate lawyers who care...

 

Rabble rabble rabble !lawyers! rabble rabble rabble

 

In reality there's often no advantage to the company, and so it's simpler to say no rather than to waste time  getting in further involvement.

 

I would hazard a guess that it has more to do with protecting their trademarks and intellectual property, among other justifiable reasons.

  • Upvote 1

Anthony Cacciatore

Share this post


Link to post

I assume they might be worried that a sim could negatively affect sales for example if the flight model is incorrect or gives a negative impression of the aircraft some how.


Ian R Tyldesley

Share this post


Link to post

I've been associated with Gulfstream for many years as a customer / maintainer of Gulfstream aircraft. I've been through many Gulfstream maintenance training schools, toured the factory in Savannah, spent time overseeing maintenance on our aircraft at GAC service centers in Savannah, Long Beach, Dallas and Luton.

 

With them, I'm very sure that it all about protection of the trademark - and that any prohibitions against the production of FS emulation of Gulfstream products originates from the corporate legal department. The company is extremely protective of its brand. Also very protective of its customers' privacy. Photographing aircraft on the flight line at any of their service centers is strictly prohibited.

  • Upvote 1

Jim Barrett

Licensed Airframe & Powerplant Mechanic, Avionics, Electrical & Air Data Systems Specialist. Qualified on: Falcon 900, CRJ-200, Dornier 328-100, Hawker 850XP and 1000, Lear 35, 45, 55 and 60, Gulfstream IV and 550, Embraer 135, Beech Premiere and 400A, MD-80.

Share this post


Link to post

The "tongue out" emoticon is there for a reason, Gerry.

 

He doen't know what he means - if there an emoticon for tha?


Gerry Howard

Share this post


Link to post

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
  • Tom Allensworth,
    Founder of AVSIM Online


  • Flight Simulation's Premier Resource!

    AVSIM is a free service to the flight simulation community. AVSIM is staffed completely by volunteers and all funds donated to AVSIM go directly back to supporting the community. Your donation here helps to pay our bandwidth costs, emergency funding, and other general costs that crop up from time to time. Thank you for your support!

    Click here for more information and to see all donations year to date.
  • Donation Goals

    AVSIM's 2020 Fundraising Goal

    Donate to our annual general fundraising goal. This donation keeps our doors open and providing you service 24 x 7 x 365. Your donation here helps to pay our bandwidth costs, emergency funding, and other general costs that crop up from time to time. We reset this goal every new year for the following year's goal.


    21%
    $5,465.00 of $25,000.00 Donate Now
×
×
  • Create New...