el_kab0ng

Is there a difference when it comes to integrations between the F1 and RXP GTN750? Does it matter which one is owned for this mod?

I'm wondering if the pop up initializes something the first time you fly it? They have a similar pop up with some of their other AC which loads in new AIRAC data which could be easily missed if you changed views. Having an annoying popup to load something in the first 5 minutes ensures it loads properly. Just a hunch.

And this counts as a counter to your counter on updates (from the same article): "No release date was provided, yet. " :wink:

Check the manuals?

Supposedly they did.

Bumping a thread from 2014 only proves QW will never release the 787 they've been 'developing' for over 2 years now.

Anyone tried landings like that in their Carenado PC12 yet? Pretty interesting approach even when using slower GA, so I can't imagine how fast everything must happen when you're running a turboprop.

I'm having difficulty interpreting your response, but let me see if I get the gist. It sounds like I have a couple of choices here: 1. Enable NOTAMS so that I can fly as long as I need to complete the SID and then notify ATC when I'm back on course. (I do this when flying out of KEGE for KDEN so I don't get vectored into a mountain. This makes sense, but I'd have to expand the SID to see if it goes beyond the 30nm range as part of my planning stage for each flight as not every SID I fly does.) 2. Expand the SID to actual way points as part of my flight plan. (This limits the runways I can use as at most airports, the SID waypoints change a bit depending on runway assignment and isn't practical in all cases.) 3. There's no way to expand the SID range beyond 30nm as it's hard coded into the product.

Try flying this route: KDEN STAKR3 PYPER PNH J17 ABI DILLO LAIKS1 KAUS IFR FL330 You'll notice that the STAKR3 SID runs pretty long and ATC will bark at you for 'straying off your flight plan' before the SID is complete. Is there a way to adjust the distances RC4 will honor before connecting to the exit point? (PYPER in this case)

You'd get this same sort of 'treatment' flying to Hawaii from the continental US. Anything that does not involve a landing outside of US borders is treated as a 'domestic' flight, subject to all the normal service restrictions you'd find on a 45 minute hop between Houston and Dallas.

Holy crap the performance of the CJ2 is miserable. 100.2% power and only getting 300-500fpm climb rates @ 160kts above FL270. Has anyone done some fiddling with the config files to get some better numbers out of this thing? Is it is, it's pretty unflyable.

I find it interesting that this bird has some really good range, but no lavatory. I wonder how RW pax handle not being able to relieve themselves during long flights.

Carenado has the Hawker which is decently fast, but the systems are sub-par when compared to their 350i and TBM850. Still good enough to fly, however.

From boeing.com: AUCKLAND, New Zealand, Sept. 17, 2012 /PRNewswire/ -- Boeing (NYSE: BA) Business Jets set a new world record for "Speed Over a Recognized Course" when a BBJ flew non-stop from Los Angeles to Auckland, New Zealand for installation of its VIP interiors. The BBJ, a 737-700 modified for VIP use, made the 5,658 nautical mile (10,479 km) trip in 13 hours, 7 minutes and 54 seconds. Granted, this was a modified BBJ with extended fuel tanks, but still.. good stretch if you ask me.

So are you saying this is more realistic than I'm giving Carenado credit for? Did they actually model real world performance contrary to the performance numbers in print?