March 14, 201610 yr Commercial Member I have the Capt Sim 777 and love it but read somewhere that the PDGM 777 actually gets better frame rates. If you have both could post your findings? Paul Grubich 2017 - Professional texture artist painting virtual aircraft I love. Be sure to check out my aged cockpits for the A2A B-377, B-17 and Connie at Flightsim.com and Avsim library
March 15, 201610 yr Author Commercial Member I thought someone here would have both versions, guess not. Paul Grubich 2017 - Professional texture artist painting virtual aircraft I love. Be sure to check out my aged cockpits for the A2A B-377, B-17 and Connie at Flightsim.com and Avsim library
March 15, 201610 yr I have both, and in my experience the PMDG T7 does indeed get better frame rates. Not by a whole lot, maybe around 10 FPS max, but enough to be noticeable.
March 15, 201610 yr So the PMDG is the better simulation AND on top of that it performs better on the sim... No questions needed as to which is the one to get! Jaime Beneyto My real life aviation and flight simulation videos [English and Spanish] System: i9 9900k OC 5.0 GHz | RTX 2080 Super | 32GB DDR4 3200MHz | Asus Z390-F
March 15, 201610 yr Author Commercial Member Thanks, I love the Capt Sim 777 but it is a dog on my system. I get 40 plus in heavy clouds with the Aerosoft Airbus set but only 17 to 21 with the CS 777 in same situation. PMDG is a bit expensive so I have to have a good reason and 10 frame rates more is a great reason. Alpha Floor I like your videos and hope you make more. Paul Grubich 2017 - Professional texture artist painting virtual aircraft I love. Be sure to check out my aged cockpits for the A2A B-377, B-17 and Connie at Flightsim.com and Avsim library
March 15, 201610 yr Thanks, I love the Capt Sim 777 but it is a dog on my system. I get 40 plus in heavy clouds with the Aerosoft Airbus set but only 17 to 21 with the CS 777 in same situation. PMDG is a bit expensive so I have to have a good reason and 10 frame rates more is a great reason. Alpha Floor I like your videos and hope you make more. Thanks for the kind words Paul! That's the kind of input that keeps me doing more videos, really! They are not perfect by all means, but I believe I do more good than harm by releasing them As to the price, well yes, the 777 is not cheap, but it's 100% worth the money. I like to regard the PMDG 777 as a simulation of the 777 on its own right, not as an "FSX addon". We can say that FSX is the add-on to be able to run the PMDG 777 and not the other way round. In fact, if you changed the product's User Agreement and turned it into a "professional" software sold for real world training, it would multiply its price by 100. Jaime Beneyto My real life aviation and flight simulation videos [English and Spanish] System: i9 9900k OC 5.0 GHz | RTX 2080 Super | 32GB DDR4 3200MHz | Asus Z390-F
March 15, 201610 yr I love the Capt Sim 777 Why specifically? Do you have the 1.7 version? Does it actually work like it should?
March 15, 201610 yr Author Commercial Member Latest version works for me. I really am an amatuer and not good at setting up FMC for autoland but the Capt Sim seems to be easy and even I can setup a flight that autolands each time. The only thing is for some reason I cannot get the throttles to reverse on landing. But,,,and it's a big one,,,it really trashes your frame rates and that is why I posted the question. I like the 777 but want a better version with better frame rates. I really wanted to buy the 747 but as it is not even in beta yet I might not live that long so the 777 will fill in until. Paul Grubich 2017 - Professional texture artist painting virtual aircraft I love. Be sure to check out my aged cockpits for the A2A B-377, B-17 and Connie at Flightsim.com and Avsim library
March 15, 201610 yr I think the PMDG 777 is a very good choice.... I would not hesitate one second. Visit my YouTube channel https://www.youtube.com/Captain Nav Follow me live on Twitch http://www.twitch.tv/captainnav
March 15, 201610 yr I own both the PMDG 777 and CS 777 for P3D. Both work great and I see little to no difference in fps. I do not see how anyone can tell the difference in frame rates for these aircraft as it all depends on your POV and system. I think the PMDG VC is a bit harder on FPS but that's I could never tell you how I feel that way. If it is a nice and sunny day with no clouds out, the fps in the PMDG 777 are great. If the weather outside is bad, the FPS in the PMDG 777 are bad. If I do a side view, it gets better, if I look straight at the VC, FPS suffer but you can go into the settings and change the performance settings if they are not good. The FMC has always been difficult to program for many but both versions handle well when the FMC is in use. The major difference between the developers is the price. If I get a chance, I'll do a flight using the fsuipc log to measure the fps for a short flight for each aircraft. Best regards, Jim Young | AVSIM Online! - Simming's Premier Resource! Member, AVSIM Board of Directors - Serving AVSIM since 2001 Submit News to AVSIMImportant other links: Basic FSX Configuration Guide | AVSIM CTD Guide | AVSIM Prepar3D Guide | Help with AVSIM Site | Signature Rules | Screen Shot Rule | AVSIM Terms of Service (ToS) I7 8086K 5.0GHz | GTX 1080 TI OC Edition | Dell 34" and 24" Monitors | ASUS Maximus X Hero MB Z370 | Samsung M.2 NVMe 500GB and 1TB | Samsung SSD 500GB x2 | Toshiba HDD 1TB | WDC HDD 1TB | Corsair H115i Pro | 16GB DDR4 3600C17 | Windows 10
March 15, 201610 yr Author Commercial Member Thanks Jim, looking forward to your results. Paul Grubich 2017 - Professional texture artist painting virtual aircraft I love. Be sure to check out my aged cockpits for the A2A B-377, B-17 and Connie at Flightsim.com and Avsim library
March 15, 201610 yr CS777 is worse than PMDG's 777 in almost every aspect i can think of: - Framerate / Smoothness; - Memory utilization (lower with PMDG's model); - Actual aircraft performance (Engines, Climb/Cruise/Descent, etc); - Exterior model (dimensions, detail); - Systems reliability (can you actually trust the simulation to behave as expected); The only thing CS777 is 'better' at is the package offer. It offers all three engines (with the caveat performance is all wrong), cabin model (what for, really) and the price is lower. CASE: Fractal Terra Silver CPU: AMD R5 7800X3D 5.0Ghz RAM: 32GB DDR5 6000 GPU: nVidia RTX 4070 Ti SUPER · SSDs: Samsung 990 PRO 2TB M.2 PCIe · PNY XLR8 CS3040 2TB M.2 PCIe · VIDEO: LG-32GK650F QHD 32" 144Hz FREE/G-SYNC · MISC: Thrustmaster TCA Airbus Joystick + Throttle Quadrant · MSFS2024 · Windows 11
March 15, 201610 yr "- Actual aircraft performance (Engines, Climb/Cruise/Descent, etc);" That is my #1 issue with the CS 777. It's flight dynamics are terrible; in my opinion, the aircraft doesn't handle like a heavy air frame. Even at $10, I have put this aircraft into mothballs. Concerning the FPS, I see little difference, as Jim articulated... Matt King
March 15, 201610 yr Thanks Jim, looking forward to your results. As I stated, the performance, FPS, VAS usage is all about the same (according to the FSUIPC.log): The CS777 first - 33524 Running in "Lockheed Martin® Prepar3D® v3", Version: 3.2.3.2 (SimConnect: 3.2.0.0) 33524 Initialising SimConnect data requests now 33524 FSUIPC Menu entry added 33540 C:\Users\JimY\AppData\Local\Lockheed Martin\Prepar3D v3\Prepar3D_Default.fxml 33540 K:\Prepar3D_v3\SimObjects\Airplanes\IRIS Raptor Driver\Raptor.air 34024 Monitor IPC:024C (S32) = 3219108 43774 Monitor IPC:024C (S32) = 3046116 53758 Monitor IPC:024C (S32) = 3023820 63742 Monitor IPC:024C (S32) = 2950148 73975 Monitor IPC:024C (S32) = 3025356 83991 Monitor IPC:024C (S32) = 3021616 94100 Monitor IPC:024C (S32) = 3021536 104021 Monitor IPC:024C (S32) = 2997656 114005 Monitor IPC:024C (S32) = 2997640 118046 Weather Mode now = Theme 124114 Monitor IPC:024C (S32) = 2997128 136516 K:\Prepar3D_v3\SimObjects\Airplanes\CS_B777-300ER_GE\csx773_GE.air 138326 Monitor IPC:024C (S32) = 2701404 146688 Monitor IPC:024C (S32) = 2240104 156812 Monitor IPC:024C (S32) = 1923436 168044 Monitor IPC:024C (S32) = 1885304 177061 Monitor IPC:024C (S32) = 1685604 182802 System time = 15/03/2016 09:21:21, Simulator time = 08:20:00 (14:20Z) 182802 Aircraft="CS 777-300ER GE Captain Paint1" 183987 Starting everything now ... 3038431 Monitor IPC:024C (S32) = 1079984 3043642 Sim stopped: average frame rate for last 2862 secs = 16.4 fps 3059944 === NOTE: not calling SimConnect_Close ... 3060942 System time = 15/03/2016 10:09:19, Simulator time = 09:14:44 (15:14Z) 3060942 *** FSUIPC log file being closed Minimum frame rate was 7.3 fps, Maximum was 30.5 fps Minimum available memory recorded was 1054Mb Average frame rate for running time of 2862 secs = 16.4 fps Memory managed: 1005 Allocs, 1005 Freed ********* FSUIPC Log file closed *********** and now the PMDG777 - 32245 Running in "Lockheed Martin® Prepar3D® v3", Version: 3.2.3.2 (SimConnect: 3.2.0.0) 32245 Initialising SimConnect data requests now 32245 FSUIPC Menu entry added 32276 C:\Users\JimY\AppData\Local\Lockheed Martin\Prepar3D v3\Prepar3D_Default.fxml 32276 K:\Prepar3D_v3\SimObjects\Airplanes\IRIS Raptor Driver\Raptor.air 32698 Monitor IPC:024C (S32) = 3223012 42448 Monitor IPC:024C (S32) = 3037924 52494 Monitor IPC:024C (S32) = 3026476 62494 Monitor IPC:024C (S32) = 3044156 68094 Weather Mode now = Theme 72603 Monitor IPC:024C (S32) = 3019252 82587 Monitor IPC:024C (S32) = 3020248 88203 K:\Prepar3D_v3\SimObjects\Airplanes\PMDG 777-300ER\B777-300ER.air 113709 Monitor IPC:024C (S32) = 2439496 123272 Monitor IPC:024C (S32) = 2207920 133381 Monitor IPC:024C (S32) = 2026072 143427 Monitor IPC:024C (S32) = 1920832 153286 Monitor IPC:024C (S32) = 1573660 153583 System time = 15/03/2016 10:13:40, Simulator time = 08:19:19 (14:19Z) 153583 Aircraft="PMDG 777-300ER PMDG House" 158809 Starting everything now ... 2533784 Monitor IPC:024C (S32) = 993376 2542504 Sim stopped: average frame rate for last 2389 secs = 16.2 fps 2557932 === NOTE: not calling SimConnect_Close ... 2558931 System time = 15/03/2016 10:53:45, Simulator time = 09:11:01 (15:11Z) 2558931 *** FSUIPC log file being closed Minimum frame rate was 7.0 fps, Maximum was 30.7 fps Minimum available memory recorded was 918Mb Average frame rate for running time of 2389 secs = 16.2 fps Memory managed: 858 Allocs, 858 Freed ********* FSUIPC Log file closed *********** The CS777 was recently upgraded to v1.7 and I really enjoy the fact you can now request your flightplan in the FMC (like the PMDG) and request Performance data (like in the PMDG). Makes programming the FMC's a bit easier. Now, what am I going to do with all of these 777's installed in P3D.... :smile: Hope this helps. Best regards, Jim Young | AVSIM Online! - Simming's Premier Resource! Member, AVSIM Board of Directors - Serving AVSIM since 2001 Submit News to AVSIMImportant other links: Basic FSX Configuration Guide | AVSIM CTD Guide | AVSIM Prepar3D Guide | Help with AVSIM Site | Signature Rules | Screen Shot Rule | AVSIM Terms of Service (ToS) I7 8086K 5.0GHz | GTX 1080 TI OC Edition | Dell 34" and 24" Monitors | ASUS Maximus X Hero MB Z370 | Samsung M.2 NVMe 500GB and 1TB | Samsung SSD 500GB x2 | Toshiba HDD 1TB | WDC HDD 1TB | Corsair H115i Pro | 16GB DDR4 3600C17 | Windows 10
March 15, 201610 yr Author Commercial Member Thanks Jim. looks like a tie to me. Paul Grubich 2017 - Professional texture artist painting virtual aircraft I love. Be sure to check out my aged cockpits for the A2A B-377, B-17 and Connie at Flightsim.com and Avsim library
Create an account or sign in to comment