December 20, 20169 yr Hi I'm trying to find right balance for NGX in AS16 configuration. Would anyone who is using this software be able to share the settings? I am currently using 35 Wake turbulence (default: 50) and 70 wind turbulence (default 100) as it seems that anything above that makes the aircraft go wild when autopilot is ON. Enhanced turbulence OFF. I posted this on PMDG forum as I think that here I'll be able to find best advice from 737 drivers. Tomasz Zawadzki
December 20, 20169 yr why not just trial an error method to see what works for you I7-8700k,Corsair h1101 cooler ,Asus Strix Gaming Intel Z370 S11 motherboard, Corsair 32gb ramDD4,, gtx 1080ti Card, RM850 power supply Peter kelberg
December 20, 20169 yr Author Because what I "like" may not be what is realistic and I'd like to see most close to RW depiction I'm able to. Tomasz Zawadzki
December 22, 20169 yr For realism, I've had to dial everything down A LOT. I've noticed- an "immersion package" overdoes the immersion. A weather package tends to over do the "weather". An AI injection package seems to overdo the AI....These packages are great but by default, in my opinion, the settings need to be dialed down. They all seem a little over anxious to show off their main trait. The settings you've mentioned, I have dialed down to 10% or less. Crazy, I know. But I like being able to actually land. Mark Trainer Mark Trainer
December 22, 20169 yr Author Well, I don't have any issues with landing since I'm doing this almost every day for some years now with NGX and I had some great fun fighting turbulence and crosswinds - it's just I don't find them always realistic and I know that if I would be one of pax on my planes I would probably simply puke all flight. Anyway - I settled on 40% wake and 70% wind. Seems to match rw behavior and also ND behavior in flight. Tomasz Zawadzki
December 22, 20169 yr settled on 40% wakeOne of these days a Cessna in the hold short position is going to take you out of the sky. I have wake turbulence set to 0. Michael Cubine
December 22, 20169 yr A lot of truth spoken here. I don't think air movement in P3D is very good. It's not going to be too realistic. Best you can get is having to react. I was near a winter cloud with 100% turbulence turned on and the A320 couldn't keep up with the turbulence...a fairly rare event and I don't think I was in a SIGMET area. I've dialed back to 70 and may go down to 50. Gregg Seipp "A good landing is when you can walk away from the airplane. A great landing is when you can reuse it." i9 64GB RAM, GTX-5090
December 22, 20169 yr Kostas, one of the HiFi Tech developers, recommends that AS2016's Turbulence Scale setting be at 35 when flying the FSL A320X. I hold to that setting regardless of what I'm flying (the NGX included), and it seems to be both manageable and exciting (at times). And please, don't fly through thunderstorms... Wayne KlocknerUnited Virtual
December 22, 20169 yr Author So you don't touch wind nor wake turbulence, just set this one global setting? Tomasz Zawadzki
December 22, 20169 yr So you don't touch wind nor wake turbulence, just set this one global setting? I don't change the wind turbulence but I do dial down the wake turbulence to 25-30...it always seems a bit severe. Wayne KlocknerUnited Virtual
December 26, 20169 yr The FSX turbulence model does unrealistic things to flight dynamics. Also, with 100% IAS variations are ridiculous. 25% for all turbulence settings suits me.
December 29, 20169 yr ASN user here. Wake turbulence 0 (off), and wind turbulence at 70% for PMDG addons, 30% for FSL A320 I found 70% to be quite realistic for where I usually fly, maybe a bit on the challenging side. 30% for FSL only because their autoflight system cannot handle it otherwise. No updraft/downdrafts. Dave P. Woycek
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.