February 6, 20179 yr 1. Overclock to at least 4.5Mhz 2. Install Intel chipset drivers in command prompt with the "-overall" option command prompt -> SetupChipset -Overall https://downloadcenter.intel.com/download/20775/Intel-Chipset-Device-Software-INF-Update-Utility- The driver is in the "Available Downloads" column and not in the "Detailed Description" column. 3. Rerun Windows System Assessment Tool (WinSAT) Open a command prompt, type "winsat formal -restart clean" Restart the PC Windows runs this on installation but it is advisable to update after a hardware change / overclock. 4. Set affinity mask to 241 - Edit: [for a 4 core with HT config]. [JOBSCHEDULER] AffinityMask=241 5. Use process lasso to run all the addons out of the first physical core, out of the first two logical cores With these 5 settings implemented the sim will run 100% smooth with no need to set a frame limiter.
February 6, 20179 yr 4. Set affinity mask to 241 [JOBSCHEDULER] AffinityMask=241 Not a global setting. Depends on number of cores.
February 6, 20179 yr 4. Set affinity mask to 241 - Edit: [for a 4 core with HT config]. [JOBSCHEDULER] AffinityMask=241 So it comes down to 10 00 11 11. (reversed) What is the reasoning behind this? HT has been known to potentially cause higher VAS usage.
February 6, 20179 yr Author So it comes down to 10 00 11 11. (reversed) What is the reasoning behind this? HT has been known to potentially cause higher VAS usage. 241 is 11 11 00 01 in binary format. (correct). Leave the 1st core alone with P3D main tasks. Leave the second core alone for windows tasks, it improves the smoothness of texture loading. It also leaves those cores free for the addons. Yes it causes higher VAS usage. The smoother the sim runs the more it uses VAS. I try to avoid places like NY and Boston.
February 6, 20179 yr Author Could you provide more details on #2, including installation? Thx, Dirk After downloading the file "SetupChipset.exe" it should be in your downloads folder. Open Command Prompt -> Right click on the windows logo on the bottom right and select "command prompt Admin" in Command prompt type the following: cd\users\[yourusername]\downloads SetupChipset -Overall [yourusername] = Your windows username
February 6, 20179 yr http://www.win-raid.com/t895f42-Intel-Chipset-Device-quot-Drivers-quot-INF-files.html according to this site it doesnt matter installing the inf files or not.
February 6, 20179 yr Just checked and I did not have the inf drivers installed and my pc is running great. To be sure I did install them and ......it did not differ from before.. Proces Lasso I do use since about a year and that is a very good utility. I am running my 5820K at 4.3 GHz with HT on. Running it with HT off at 4.5 GHz makes it not one bit smoother. Framerate is up by 1% and long frames are up too. Therefore I choose the lowest clockspeed of the 2. 5950x3d 5.4-5.7 GHz - Asus ROG 870 Crosshair Apex - GSkill Neo 2x 24 Gb 6000 mhz / cas 26 - MSI RTX 5090 Gaming Trio OC - 1x SSD M2 6000 2TB - 1x SSD M2 2800/1800 1Tb - Corsair 5400 case - Corsair 360 liquid cooling set - 3x 75’ TCL tv. 13600 6 cores @ 5.1 GHz / 8 cores @ 4.0 GHz (hypterthreading on) - Asus ROG Strix Gaming D - GSkill Trident 4x Gb 3200 MHz cas 15 - Asus TUF RTX 4080 16 Gb - 1x SSD M2 2800/1800 2TB - 2x Sata 600 SSD 500 Mb - Corsair D4000 Airflow case - NXT Krajen Z63 AIO liquide cooling - FOV : 200 degrees My flightsim vids : https://www.youtube.com/user/fswidesim/videos?shelf_id=0&sort=dd&view=0
February 7, 20179 yr After downloading the file "SetupChipset.exe" it should be in your downloads folder. Open Command Prompt -> Right click on the windows logo on the bottom right and select "command prompt Admin" in Command prompt type the following: cd\users\[yourusername]\downloads SetupChipset -Overall [yourusername] = Your windows username Thanks, I'll try to update my chipset driver with that option. Of course I installed the Intel chipset driver at my system set up time, but without that option. Still curious what makes it particularly different? Dirk.
February 7, 20179 yr 241 is 11 11 00 01 in binary format. (correct). Leave the 1st core alone with P3D main tasks. Leave the second core alone for windows tasks, it improves the smoothness of texture loading. It also leaves those cores free for the addons. I see. And how does windows know to push windows tasks onto Core1? Yes it causes higher VAS usage. The smoother the sim runs the more it uses VAS. Hm, never heard of this. I have a quite smooth sim, and my starting point at an addon airport with FSL A320 is usually around 1GB free. However there is a discussion still ongoing on P3D forum about rising VAS usage. There are unfortunately various speculations only.
February 7, 20179 yr The smoother the sim runs the more it uses VAS. This is a funny claim and a very superficial one. There is frame rates, there is smoothness (which is IMO a function of frame rates and subjective judgment of the observer) and there is memory usage. So, the impression of smoothness and VAS may be related depending on the sim's configuration, but not in the way you are claiming. A system may run smooth because settings are low and CPU and GPU manage the traffic very well. At the same time VAS may be low and may stay low since the low settings do not require a lot of data travel through memory. More powerful PC hardware will allow keeping high frame rates and to a certain extend as well smoothness if settings are increased - up to a certain level depending on a multitude of factors, i.e. addons installed, mainly; VAS will naturally increase too. Now, applying high res settings in the sim to a not so powerful PC will bring frame rates and smoothness down eventually; still the VAS usage will be the same as on a powerful PC if you apply comparable settings (and assuming you have the same addons installed of course)... Am I totally wrong? Best Regards Frank Frank Hoehn I7-6700K, Asus Z170-A, 32GB DDR4, GeForce GTX 1070, Samsung 850 Evo 500GB, Samsung 850 Evo 1TB (P3D), WD Blue 4TB, Win10 Pro 1803, P3Dv4.4
February 7, 20179 yr Just checked and I did not have the inf drivers installed and my pc is running great. To be sure I did install them and ......it did not differ from before.. Proces Lasso I do use since about a year and that is a very good utility. I am running my 5820K at 4.3 GHz with HT on. Running it with HT off at 4.5 GHz makes it not one bit smoother. Framerate is up by 1% and long frames are up too. Therefore I choose the lowest clockspeed of the 2. yes, INF files are text files, and do nothing then LABEL a driver. And those are not updated in a long time it seems. I have downloaded process-lasso and it looks promising, will try it out this week. Thanks for the heads up Gerard.
February 7, 20179 yr Author It is always possible to create a restore point if you don't trust the Intel drivers. Intel drivers aren't just information about the description of items in the device manager. The only reason that the motherboard drivers are required is that the motherboards have specific features like sound or wifi that Intel doesn't cover, but a new motherboard will still work with intell drivers it uses their chipset. The chipset is designed by Intel. In the old days there were also vendor drivers for the graphics cards but generally people always used original drivers from Nvidia or AMD.
February 7, 20179 yr Hi, I'm not qualified to comment sensibly on the technicalities, but I've been discouraged lately with poor performance, without knowingly making any changes. I haven't been able to improve performance by lowering settings below what I feel acceptable. I've been using an Affinity Mask of 116, HT on, plus using Process Lasso. When I saw this thread I decided to give the suggestions a try. The difference has been dramatic. I have a vital few extra fps at higher settings, and a very smooth experience. Thanks, Kakusso. Asus Rog Maximus VIII Hero, i9-10900k 4.8GHZ, Corsair H100 cooler, 32GB Corsair Vengeance 2666, RTX3090 20GB, Win10 HP 64-bit, 3 Monitors "19-22-19", Reverb G2 Headset.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.