April 6, 200620 yr I'd love highly detailed (good VC and systems simulated as well) propliners--DC-4/6/7 and Connie.A Mooney. Something. Anything. Please, God, anything to replace that abomination of a default Bravo.I'd love Carenado to freshen up their C210M to bring it up to the high standards they've set with their later C182RG and C206G.I want Aeroworx to do their Caravan someday. :)Lewis "Moose" GregoryRichmond, Virginia Lewis "Moose" Gregory Durham, North Carolina
April 6, 200620 yr Hi Everyone,I would like to see a Dassault Falcon 20, with a cargo version. A good VC, but keep it simple enough to fly on mid-range machines and keep the price reasonable.Dale Dale
April 26, 200620 yr >Fokker 70/100Is up to come in July by FSQualityHigly detailed Fokker aircraft simulation with FMS A/P and so on..Special feature is a ND integreated weather radar with real ground reflections, and a TAWS systemregardsflorian
April 26, 200620 yr I can't understand how nobody has ever attempted to give us a quality version of the Mooney BravoI'd also like to see a Carenado or Dreamfleet quality type version of the Beaver. I'm sure that a really good Beaver would sell well as bush flying rates up there with the jets.Barry
April 26, 200620 yr Why is it that no one at all mentioned a PMDG or Level-D quality 777?It seems to be that a lot of people are starting to go towards the "Retro" style Classic airliners, while a lot of other people are concentrating on the lack of a PMDG or Level-D quality Airbus, that a majority of FS2004 users seemed to have forgetten the fact that to this day, no PMDG or Level-D quality 777 has ever been developed for the MSFS series.I have the greatest of respect for PSS, but all the versions of their 777 panels have never been developed up to the standard of PMDG or Level-D, while FeelThere has openely stated that their 777-200ER product is not a Pilot In Command product but rather a Fleet product, which basically means that the FeelThere 777-200ER panel has been some what dumbed-down with regards to systems and FMC complexity.I'm all for Classic-style airliners, in fact the 747-300 and L1011-200 are my favorite classic airliners, but the 777-200ER is such a beautiful and high-tech plane that it's easily become my all-time favorite airliner. In fact, with all due respect to PMDG, I always wanted PMDG to develop a highly detailed 777-200ER for FS2004 before the 747-400. I still feel a great satisfaction that PMDG developed the 747-400, because that plane is also one of my favorites, but can you guys just imagine what a 777-200ER would be like if it was developed with the **EXACT** same standard of the PMDG 747-400? In fact, imagine having the 777's unique electronic checklist plus the unique electronic flight bag (EFB) all in one highly detailed 777-200ER package from PMDG.What do you guys think???? :)Regards,
April 27, 200620 yr Im still anxious for the MU2 to come out, although they dont seem to be doing to much progress on her. ah well only time will tell lol Intel I7 12700KF / 32 GB Ram-3600mhz / Windows 11 - 64 bit / NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060TI / 32" Acer Monitor, Honeycomb alpha/bravo, CH rudder pedals, Tobii 5, Buttkicker, Logitech radio panel.
Create an account or sign in to comment