March 1, 20188 yr 55 minutes ago, anthonyg96 said: Qwality wings did a 787 Did they? ^^ For which sim? ;D and what I have read (no personal exp) it seems to be as study level as the CS 757... ,
March 1, 20188 yr Commercial Member 3 hours ago, anthonyg96 said: Qwality wings did a 787 Not at the level of PMDG though.
March 1, 20188 yr 12 hours ago, ganter said: JUST GIVE US A 788! Why stop at the -8...? ;) Trevor Hannant
March 1, 20188 yr 12 hours ago, anthonyg96 said: Qwality wings did a 787 Yeah, they've done one as have AFS Design but doesn't mean to say it's up to the standards expected from other developers. If PMDG are developing a 787 then anyone even thinking about the QW one should fly other airframes and save their cash until it's released from here. Trevor Hannant
March 1, 20188 yr Are these comments about the QW 787 based on personal experience and accurate information, or are they just unsubstantiated opinions? Edited March 1, 20188 yr by Christopher Low Christopher Low AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D CPU / 64GB DDR5-6000 RAM / 12GB Nvidia RTX 4070 Super GPU / Gigabyte X870E Aorus Elite Wifi 7 / 1+2TB Samsung Evo Plus M2 Nvme UK2000 Beta Tester
March 1, 20188 yr 13 minutes ago, Christopher Low said: Are these comments about the QW 787 based on personal experience and accurate information, or are they just unsubstantiated opinions? try facts? QW did a good job, dont get me wrong. But the overall quality like certain textures for example are low quality. The plane flies, sometimes nicely too, but it doesnt compare to PMDG quality. Michael Backes Windows 10 x64 | i7 8086k 5.0 GHz | 32GB DDR4 3200MHz | 1250W PSU | GeForece RTX 2080 | ASUS TUF Z390 Plus Gaming | 2x ASUS 22" Monitors + 1 39" 4K SEIKI TV (mounted) | Intel PCIe 1.2TB SSD and 6TB Seagate HDD (1 for OS and 1 for P3D v4) | Corsiar H100i GTX Extreme Liquid Cooler |
March 1, 20188 yr 52 minutes ago, Christopher Low said: Are these comments about the QW 787 based on personal experience and accurate information, or are they just unsubstantiated opinions? as I have written above I have only read about it and seen YT videos. I don't have the FSX version as I have left FSX when P3D v3 came out. But: The reviews and forum posts I have read and relating to several "in depth" YT vids it's absolutely not what it is claimed to be. It was advertised as a great study level Dreamliner but in fact it is not. Developers seem to have become quite fast in claiming their addons as "study level". But in my understanding "study level" means that I can learn this airplane in the sim, can study its manuals, FCOMs, and so on and jump into the real airplane and be able to manage its systems. As I have just read about it and didn't try it I cannot give specific examples in detail about it, but fortunately I'm not the only one to hold it that way :D Yes, it's kind of "but the others have said, that...", but that is how word of mouth works :D And there ARE serious reviewers and 787 pilots out there. It's similar to the other airplane I mentioned. It looks nice but as soon as you have to deal with compromises when setting up the FMS it's not study level. When weights are taken from somewhere else than my fingers entering them.. well... There are study level airplanes, PMDG provide them, FSL, A2A... not sure about the Q400 but I think at least the Pro version IS... Maddog.. But we still miss a 787, 757/767, oh there are so many that are missing ;D. Nice airplane, for sure... And I impatiently wait for its P3D release... but if PMDG was faster... ,
March 1, 20188 yr Commercial Member 3 minutes ago, Ephedrin said: "your content will need to be approved by a moderator".. lol? I approved it, although I have no clue why it was put in that state... Chris Makris PLEASE NOTE PMDG HAS DEPARTED AVSIM You can find us at http://forum.pmdg.com
March 1, 20188 yr Commercial Member 2 minutes ago, Olympic260 said: I approved it, although I have no clue why it was put in that state... His post had the word FSL in it, hence the necessary approval.
March 1, 20188 yr 16 minutes ago, Milton Waddams said: His post had the word in it, hence the necessary approval. LMAO.. Edited March 1, 20188 yr by Olympic260 Removed the world to avoid continues aprooval requests ,
March 1, 20188 yr 4 hours ago, Christopher Low said: Are these comments about the QW 787 based on personal experience and accurate information, or are they just unsubstantiated opinions? Speaking only for myself - they are just baseless conjecture, ramblings, rantings and wine; born of my desire to fly a PMDG airframe based on it. ;-)
March 1, 20188 yr 7 hours ago, elmucki said: try facts? QW did a good job, dont get me wrong. But the overall quality like certain textures for example are low quality. The plane flies, sometimes nicely too, but it doesnt compare to PMDG quality. That's an opinion. Go to the paid support 787 forums and see the issues those bird have. Mine is grounded cause has issues with NAV among other things. Some can't even take off. That's why I really, really hope next PMDG plane will be the 787 series. Edited March 1, 20188 yr by PaulGR Pawel Grochowski
March 5, 20188 yr Slagging the competitions products is (or at least used to be) against forum policy and I am quite surprised that the moderators have let it get this far. Paul Smith.
March 5, 20188 yr 1 hour ago, Paul_Smith said: Slagging the competitions products is (or at least used to be) against forum policy and I am quite surprised that the moderators have let it get this far. there's a difference between slagging and comparing. competition requires comparisions and as long as there aren't any lies but facts and justified opinions it's necessary.. Some developers tend to claim their products as sth that just doesn't apply and if there was no (negative) criticism allowed but only commendation nothing would ever change. Jumping on the bandwagon of "study level" addons is easy.. To keep the promise is a bit harder. ,
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.