May 1, 20197 yr Actually, there's no reason to believe that Aerofly FS2 was even written from scratch. There was an Aerofly FS version 1. 14 minutes ago, Jeff Nielsen said: If that's a "new" main engine, then we're in trouble...LOL. I love ya Pete, but c'mon. 🙂 I'm not sure what your point is, but aren't these speculative posts about the P3d "engine" becoming a bit tiresome? If you want to believe that it's the same as FSX, that's your choice. I think that Pete knows more about flight sims than anyone, except maybe the simulation staff of LM and LR. Edited May 1, 20197 yr by jabloomf1230
May 1, 20197 yr Commercial Member P3D is compatible with common hardware at the moment, that supports DIrect3D 11. Development is corridored by the constraints of doing things in a particular way for the GPU with those application programming methods. But it is true that much of the same file formats and systems are still in place since P3D also supports compatible software such as the addons available right now. So as Pete says the steps are incremental but also these steps are in line with hardware and what is generally around in the sites intended for it. Steve Waite: Engineer at codelegend.com
May 1, 20197 yr Steve, Nvidia released CUDA 10.1 😎 5950x3d 5.4-5.7 GHz - Asus ROG 870 Crosshair Apex - GSkill Neo 2x 24 Gb 6000 mhz / cas 26 - MSI RTX 5090 Gaming Trio OC - 1x SSD M2 6000 2TB - 1x SSD M2 2800/1800 1Tb - Corsair 5400 case - Corsair 360 liquid cooling set - 3x 75’ TCL tv. 13600 6 cores @ 5.1 GHz / 8 cores @ 4.0 GHz (hypterthreading on) - Asus ROG Strix Gaming D - GSkill Trident 4x Gb 3200 MHz cas 15 - Asus TUF RTX 4080 16 Gb - 1x SSD M2 2800/1800 2TB - 2x Sata 600 SSD 500 Mb - Corsair D4000 Airflow case - NXT Krajen Z63 AIO liquide cooling - FOV : 200 degrees My flightsim vids : https://www.youtube.com/user/fswidesim/videos?shelf_id=0&sort=dd&view=0
May 1, 20197 yr Commercial Member 22 hours ago, Jeff Nielsen said: If that's a "new" main engine, then we're in trouble So Aerofly FS2 is bad? I for one aren't in trouble as I don't use it! I suspect you have misread something. Pete Win10: 22H2 19045.2728 CPU: 9900KS at 5.5GHz Memory: 32Gb at 3800 MHz. GPU: RTX 24Gb Titan 2 x 2160p projectors at 25Hz onto 200 FOV curved screen
May 1, 20197 yr Commercial Member 22 hours ago, jabloomf1230 said: Actually, there's no reason to believe that Aerofly FS2 was even written from scratch. There was an Aerofly FS version 1. Ah, sorry. I should probably have said "AeroFly FS", though for all I know version 2 might have been a rewrite. Pete Win10: 22H2 19045.2728 CPU: 9900KS at 5.5GHz Memory: 32Gb at 3800 MHz. GPU: RTX 24Gb Titan 2 x 2160p projectors at 25Hz onto 200 FOV curved screen
May 1, 20197 yr 18 minutes ago, Pete Dowson said: So Aerofly FS2 is bad? I for one aren't in trouble as I don't use it! I suspect you have misread something. Pete You know what, I did misread that. I thought you were talking about P3D. Sorry Pete. I should have known you wouldn't have said that about P3D...LOL Jeff D. Nielsen (KMCI) https://www.twitch.tv/pilotskcx https://discord.io/MaxDutyDay VENGEANCE a8200 Gaming PC: AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D, GeForce RTX 5080, 64GB DDR5, 4TB (2TB/2TB) M.2 SSD, Win11 Pro
February 17, 20206 yr On 4/17/2019 at 2:30 AM, clive6354 said: Whilst many users wait for a fix to be issued in relation to low FPS in V4.5 do they return to using V4.4. I had changed to V4.5 mainly to take advantage of the new night lighting, especially when used with words not allowed software but not possible at the moment Clive Alexander Well I tried returning back to 4.4 because apparently there's an issue with 4.5 causing FPS performance at night. I never had any problems before up until now and I know it's definitely not my system. Flying during the day though is flawless.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.