October 29, 200619 yr Microsoft had to know that Active Camera allowed saved vc views with a couple of keystrokes. Then recalling the view was as easy as "Control plus 1" as an example. I saved 10 views for each aircraft. So why does Microsoft intentionally dumb down their camera system for FSX? They made good progress over FS9 but left out the best part of Active Camera. It makes no sense to me. Curt Branch
October 29, 200619 yr I have a correction.The FSX head latency does work on the runway.. except its very subtle. Need to find out..which variable and try to increase it.Its prominent when you are in the rough. I mean.. outside the runway...in rough terrain.MAnny Manny Beta tester for SIMStarter
October 29, 200619 yr Just add it my ever longer list for not getting FSX - active camera is a must for me.Bruceb Bruce Bartlett Frodo: "I wish none of this had happened." Gandalf: "So do all who live to see such times, but that is not for them to decide. All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given to us."
October 29, 200619 yr I'm sure a lot of people would pay for a AC update: the dev of AC is missing a lot of income. Indeed, if someone else could make a comparable pluging, he'd make quit a lot of money in no time. I surely would pay for it. Which doesn't mean that a free utility isn't welcome, of course... ;)
October 29, 200619 yr It's easy to do an addon that does what you want.Posted this morning in fsdeveloper wiki how to use the flt file to change cameras views. There is a set camera view simconnect function. So everything needed is available except the program :).Jos
October 29, 200619 yr Hi..according to serge i was one of the 1st buyers of Active Camera.that must be around 20023,can't remember now.anyway.my point is.....I miss it SSSOOOO MUCH I'M POSTING tWICE:-) :-) :-) STEVE
October 29, 200619 yr Here's the link:http://www.fsdeveloper.com/wiki/index.php?...e_cameras_viewsInteresting! You can of course also edit an existing view to your liking: that's what I'm planning to do. I mainly fly the Baron with the G1000: it's got a lot of views under the A which I do not need, so I'll just replace the old info with my new info. This eliminates the need for making up new GUID's and CameraDefenitions. If I'm not mistaken... So I'll go the the standard VC view, edit it, save the flight and copy the info from the standard VC view to the info under one of the views I don't need. This will also give me the options I need (like beig able to look around, which you can't do in most other A-views in the baron).Thx for this clever approach! I'll give it a try tonight!
October 29, 200619 yr >I was on the Active Camera camp as a must but when I bought>Head Tracker IR I found that you cant have both. I decided to>not use the Head Tracker IR pro 4 even though it cost me a lot>of money because I like the effect of active camera better.>>In FSX they offer something simular to Active Camera and I>like the things it does that Active Camera doesnt. Like when>you take off your view pans back a bit like your being pushed>back in the seat and visa versa on stopping.>>You can pan and zoom in FSX close to how you could with Active>Camera.>>If you look in the assignment settings or config file (I>forget which one) there are more views to assign then any>other thing.>>Hopefully Head Tracker IR will work with FSX and I will now>get the best of both worlds.>>However there are many things that active camera offers that>FSX doesnt have and it is sad that the author wont be making>it for FSX.You can use booth in fs9. You just have to turn off a setting in AC to get them to work together. Dont remember which on though.
October 29, 200619 yr >I was on the Active Camera camp as a must but when I bought>Head Tracker IR I found that you cant have both. I decided to>not use the Head Tracker IR pro 4 even though it cost me a lot>of money because I like the effect of active camera better.>>In FSX they offer something simular to Active Camera and I>like the things it does that Active Camera doesnt. Like when>you take off your view pans back a bit like your being pushed>back in the seat and visa versa on stopping.>>You can pan and zoom in FSX close to how you could with Active>Camera.>>If you look in the assignment settings or config file (I>forget which one) there are more views to assign then any>other thing.>>Hopefully Head Tracker IR will work with FSX and I will now>get the best of both worlds.>>However there are many things that active camera offers that>FSX doesnt have and it is sad that the author wont be making>it for FSX.You can use booth in fs9. You just have to turn off a setting in AC to get them to work together. Dont remember which on though.
October 29, 200619 yr >I`m missing the tower in the map. Is there any posibility to>position a fixed outside view?>>el_capit
October 29, 200619 yr >also lets not forget the way you could just right click>anywhere on the screen to set the tower view position for nice>replay angles!...or the way you could see the cockpit>vibrating around you as you roll out at speed for take>off...and yes, saving the views on the fly..these were my 3>favirote reasons for using...and now missing active>camera..the fsx cameras are an improvement over default fs9>cameras...but its nowhere near as good as AC and never will>be.>>>DaveHow can I set a tower view position with a right mouse click in FSX? The only choices I get are other airport towers.:-zhelp
Create an account or sign in to comment