November 7, 200619 yr Microsoft just launched their response to "Google Earth" and the results are nothing short of stunning. Major cities all feature 3D models of virtually all buildings and landmarks.Could this mean the end for autogen and the "hello" to true 3D buildings that are being pulled from a MS cluster? Certainly a thought that might be worth considering.http://local.live.comPat
November 7, 200619 yr Its a preview of FS11...I think MS had this before google but google got theirs out earlier...just a guessBill
November 7, 200619 yr Author Go figure MS makes you use IE for it, I'll pass.Regards, MichaelKDFW Asus A8N32-SLI Deluxe nForce4 SLI-x16 / AMD Best, Michael KDFW
November 7, 200619 yr Try this one.... It's my favorite ! http://www.wikimapia.orgBob (Las Cruces, NM)
November 7, 200619 yr Pat, you wrote:<< end for autogen and the "hello" to true 3D buildings that are being pulled from a MS cluster>>I'd guess the community would revolt if only objects in the sim were located at the short list of cities that are imaged here.
November 7, 200619 yr Would really be nice if they made it Firefox-compatible.... :( Declared weather: FSX: ASN / FS9: ASE
November 7, 200619 yr >How original they are in their creativity. lolWell, Google didn't exactly think of it first either. They bought Google Earth from Key Hole.For MS to put it into a browser instead of stand alone application is a first.Matt
November 7, 200619 yr >Would really be nice if they made it Firefox-compatible....>:(>From what I've heard, that is being worked on.Matt
November 7, 200619 yr >Pat, you wrote:>>><< end for autogen and the "hello" to true 3D buildings that>are being pulled from a MS cluster>>>>I'd guess the community would revolt if only objects in the>sim were located at the short list of cities that are imaged>here. >>Well....they could do some cities in 3D detail and others with standard autogen. Kind of like they do now.If they have some technology that generates the 3D buildings more or less automatically, then could cover very large areas. Be interesting to see how their 3D coverage expands over the coming months.
November 7, 200619 yr I would almost bet that this is what is going to happen in the future. Streaming satellite data with 3D objects where available and/or autogen where no data is available, plus alpha textures for seasonal changes and nighttime. It's an impressive start, but I think there's much more to come.Pat
November 8, 200619 yr >Wrong.>>Google Maps does just that.>>JamesHow do you figure? Google maps is strictly 2D top-down view.MS VE is more comparable to Google Earth.Matt
November 8, 200619 yr >>How do you figure? Google maps is strictly 2D top-down view.>In google you can click and hold down on the plus or minus buttons to tilt your view from the 2D top down to a 3D side view, which gives you a 3D view of mountains & hills. You can also rotate the view by dragging on the circle. You can also then place your mouse hand on the scenery and give it a small tug, and you will glide over the mountains at a constant speed.I updated my Google Earth in July with the beta, and it has a nice tool in the top right corner for doing this.regardsDavid
Create an account or sign in to comment