13 minutes ago, BijanStudio said:

I said depending on his system. 

Show me from yours. 

Here you go to  start Orbx London and Orbx London EGLC. VC view not external. Am useing to test the most FPS friendy VC I know.

LOD200

LOD 400

So please show me a system that can up that and only lose 5 FPS.

Edited July 28, 20214 yr by Nyxx

I have increased LODs to high values like 800/600 but I don't see much improvement in trees/objects drawing distance. Flying with the TBM 930 in KFHR-KSEA-KTIW area, I did not experience much performance loss either. I'm not yet sure how do interpret this, but at least I have a very good performance, no stutters and barely noticeable pop-ins.

1 minute ago, Nemo said:

I have increased LODs to high values like 800/600 but I don't see much improvement in trees/objects drawing distance. 

I dont understand Harry how you cannot see a diffrence. 

London at LOD 400

3 minutes ago, Nyxx said:

I dont understand Harry how you cannot see a diffrence. 

London at LOD 400

 

Maybe I'm too much focused on trees in rural areas. Trees drawing distance improved from 6 nm to maximum 8 or 9 nm when I changed LOD from 200 to 600 or 800. London could be a different story. I'll try tomorrow.

1 hour ago, BijanStudio said:

There is no way you could get Norway to look like this before: I think this is LOD 500, if I remember correctly.  FPS 60's

 

What's the frame rate hit if you increase lod from 200 to 500? Also if I may ask, why are you even doing this ? Default lod looks acceptable IMO. People just love to mess stuff up in cfgs thinking it's fsx and then whine on forums if they get ctds (not talking about you). Increasing lods like this and tinkering with cfg files should be discouraged. But as they say, old habits die hard.

Edited July 28, 20214 yr by Baber20

Where do you increase the LOD? What parameter do you change ?

5 hours ago, ckyliu said:

I think your screen resolution is the cause, Jean Luc of RXP made quite a technical explanation elsewhere about how the object binning works, it's based on percentage of screen space an object occupies but it is affected by screen resolution and I note you are running superwide, frmo what I gather superwide resolutions may suffer a "penalty"

https://www.avsim.com/forums/topic/603955-microsoftasobo-proved-theyre-pandering-to-console-users/page/15/?tab=comments#comment-4581394

Whoa - I have trees way out into the distance!  I set Terrain and objects in the IserCfg.opt like this prior to posting my screenshots.

{Terrain
        LoDFactor 4.000000
    }
    {ObjectsLoD
        LoDFactor 4.000000

I changed Render level to 130% but trees still finished early.  This time I had a CTD.  Set Render level back to 100 percent, rebooted and I have trees way out in the distance, even on distant hills!  The CTD did me a favour!