6400 and 7600GT, 2G and VistaAutogen medium, Scenery complexity dense, 20% MyTrafficX. Got a nice EDDK-KPHL with no problems regarding frames. Don't know how many frames since don't have the time to check frames in a final. But if you can do a flight and don't care about FPS I believe that's all said.After all it is a great value for 15$. Of course there are things that could be better but a new model, FMC and working in FSX for that value you can't ask for more.Jos

Adding to what hladamjr suggested,You can also lower the pixel_size parameter in the virtual cockpit entry or entries to 512,512 from 1024,1024. That's what unchecking high resolution cockpit does effectively. But this way, you have greater control, since you may want one virtual cockpit section to be at higher resolution and another at lower resolution. For example, glass gauges tend to have a much greater impact at high resolution, but steam gauges not so much. It would be nice if you could change the resolution of gauges individually, though. Sometimes this makes things blurry, but other times the effect is minimal. You have to experiment and it depends on the formatting of the gauges. Portrait tends to hold up a lot better than landscape, which would explain why the fmc and potentially the eadi look okay. If i'm having performance trouble, this is always the first area I fiddle with.

Will the repaints for the Fs9 version work in 10? I absolutely love the 767 in FSX!

Yes, they work as is. A tutorial to convert them to FSX is available at the Level-D forums: http://leveldsim.com/forumsDaryl ShuttleworthLevel-D SimulationsSupport & Documentation