April 7, 20233 yr Huge kudos to Flying Iron Sims (especially GotGravel) for this one. Some highlights for those who don't want to watch the video. A forthcoming version of the FIS MkIX has been tuned to exactly mirror the performance of the RAF's Battle of Britain Memorial Flight MkIX tail no. MK356 . The RAF are using that version now G meter to be added (used by RAF for display co-ordination) The description includes a link so you can download an MSFS Replay recording of Sqn Ldr Mark "Disco" Discombe's display manouevre and emergency landing. Then you can play it from your choice of camera angle in MSFS Varjo Aero, 5090 FE, i9-12900K, 64GB Ram, RX Viper Rudder Pedals, AuthentiKit Controls + Fulcrum Yoke
April 7, 20233 yr 14 minutes ago, JabbleWok said: Time I bought this beauty! a solid product Dominique Simming since 1981 - [email protected] GHz with 16 GB of RAM and a 1080 with 8 GB VRAM running a 27" @ 2560*1440 - Windows 10 - Warthog HOTAS - MFG pedals - MSFS Standard version with Steam
April 7, 20233 yr I'll have to revisit the FI Spitfire Mark IX Great video too ! But in soaring I have been advocating the use of MFS, more than any other simulator ( Condorsoaring is an exception but only for task training because the scenery for Portugal is not highly detailed ...), to train emmergencies and landing out scenarios. In a recent preparation for flying at LPMU in the north-east of mainland Portugal, MFS proved invaluable because the scenery is so good / realistic that together with xCSoar I can actually use it to preview tasks or debrief flown ones 🙂 Edited April 7, 20233 yr by jcomm Flying gliders since 1980 Flightsimming since 1992 AMD Ryzen 5600x, 32GB RAM, GPU Nvidia RTX 3060 Ti 8 GB, 1 TB and 500 GB nvme2 SSD drives, HP 27" 60Hz LED monitor @ 1920x1080, T16000, Hotas from old X52 Pro, Saitek Combat Rudder Pro (2010 model)
April 7, 20233 yr That's a nice endorsement of MSFS by the RAF, if they use MSFS for training for emergencies. Edited April 7, 20233 yr by abrams_tank i5-12400, RTX 3060 Ti, 32 GB RAM
April 9, 20233 yr Author On 4/7/2023 at 5:54 PM, abrams_tank said: That's a nice endorsement of MSFS by the RAF, if they use MSFS for training for emergencies. They originally built this for PR purposes but the pilots wanted a go and that led it's new use for training which should start in a week or so. Varjo Aero, 5090 FE, i9-12900K, 64GB Ram, RX Viper Rudder Pedals, AuthentiKit Controls + Fulcrum Yoke
April 9, 20233 yr 8 hours ago, Spit40 said: They originally built this for PR purposes but the pilots wanted a go and that led it's new use for training which should start in a week or so. Nice. So the RAF are using MSFS for actual training. That's a very nice endorsement of MSFS by the RAF, if they are using it for actual training. i5-12400, RTX 3060 Ti, 32 GB RAM
April 9, 20233 yr Author At the 4:30 mark in the video you can hear Disco say they’ll be putting fighter pilots through engine failure tests in this MSFS based trainer on Friday, which refers to next Friday 14th. Edited April 9, 20233 yr by Spit40 Varjo Aero, 5090 FE, i9-12900K, 64GB Ram, RX Viper Rudder Pedals, AuthentiKit Controls + Fulcrum Yoke
April 10, 20233 yr Now before we go off wondering why the worlds airlines aren't using MSFS to train its pilots, as I understand it, at least in the US and from others comments from around the globe, MSFS is not certified for real life pilot training ie it is not a certified simulator. Hence the ad infinitum game/simulator arguments!! I get the impression here that the RAF are not using MSFS to teach pilots how to fly the Spitfire or to certify them them to fly it. Instead, this is purely procedural training but with the replay capability of MSFS to add some good self critiquing. I remember procedural training being done in a class room sitting at a desk with cardboard cutouts of the flight controls and gauges and touching things as required to follow the checklist in any given emergency. So, it's excellent that the RAF and Flying Iron are collaborating closely on this project which is procedural training on steroids!! Engagement from the real life side of the house is no bad thing when it provides critical information and feedback and allows developers to improve the fidelity of their products. And it is an endorsement or at least a recognition from those in the Memorial Flight that this can only be a good thing for both sides of the house. Per Ardua ad Astra. Terry Edited April 10, 20233 yr by Lord Farringdon No. No, Mav, this is not a good idea. Sorry Goose, but it's time to buzz the tower! Intel (R) Core (TM) i7-10700 CPU @2.90Ghz, 32GB RAM, NVIDEA GeForce RTX 3060, 12GB VRAM, Samsung QN70A 4k 65inch TV with VRR 120Hz Free Sync (G-Sync Compatible). Boeing Thrustmaster TCA Yoke, Honeycomb Bravo Throttle Quadrant, Turtle Beach Velocity One Rudder Pedals.
April 10, 20233 yr 1 hour ago, Lord Farringdon said: Now before we go off wondering why the worlds airlines aren't using MSFS to train its pilots, as I understand it, at least in the US and from others comments from around the globe, MSFS is not certified for real life pilot training ie it is not a certified simulator. Hence the ad infinitum game/simulator arguments!! I get the impression here that the RAF are not using MSFS to teach pilots how to fly the Spitfire or to certify them them to fly it. Instead, this is purely procedural training Out of curiosity, what exactly is a “certified simulator”, who certifies them and what sort of certification is issued? I was under the impression all simulators are for procedural training? I’ve never heard of anyone being taught to actually fly an aircraft in a simulator?
April 10, 20233 yr Another good use that can be given to a scenery-realistic sim like MFS, apart from procedural training, is for emergencies training, for instance in glider task planning. I am using MFS, more than Condorsoaring, to prepare for RL glider tasks, specially when flying into zones new to me or that I seldom visit, because more than any other sim MFS gives me a very acceptable representation of potential "landables" should I have to look for one IRL... GA pilots training for their x-country flights, or visiting airfields they have never flown into before, can also really benefit from MFS, again due to remarkable resemblance between MFS's scenery and the real life places and their features (with the exceptions of trees which I set at LOW in the Graphics Options because otherwise they're too dense 😕 ) Edited April 10, 20233 yr by jcomm Flying gliders since 1980 Flightsimming since 1992 AMD Ryzen 5600x, 32GB RAM, GPU Nvidia RTX 3060 Ti 8 GB, 1 TB and 500 GB nvme2 SSD drives, HP 27" 60Hz LED monitor @ 1920x1080, T16000, Hotas from old X52 Pro, Saitek Combat Rudder Pro (2010 model)
April 10, 20233 yr Sounds like some of you didn't actually watched the video and rushed to comment..... 5800X3D. 32 GB RAM. 1TB SATA SSD. 3TB HDD. RX 9070XT.
April 10, 20233 yr 2 hours ago, DD_Arthur said: Out of curiosity, what exactly is a “certified simulator”, who certifies them and what sort of certification is issued? I was under the impression all simulators are for procedural training? I’ve never heard of anyone being taught to actually fly an aircraft in a simulator? In the US, simulators are certified by the FAA. The governing regulations are in 14 CFR Part 60. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-14/chapter-I/subchapter-D/part-60 There are several levels of certification ranging from desktop procedural trainers to full motion Level D simulators. One desktop simulator available to hobbyists (Aerowinx PSX) can be certified as a procedural trainer for real 747-400 crews. It is used by Atlas Air and Lufthansa and probably others. Pilots certainly can be (and are) are “taught to fly” in simulators. When an airline or corporate pilot obtains a new FAA type rating for a particular aircraft, all of the training will be conducted in a full motion (Level D) certified simulator. With the type rating, the pilot is authorized to fly a specific make and model of aircraft (with passengers) and may do so for the first time never having flown “the real thing” before. Jim BarrettLicensed Airframe & Powerplant Mechanic, Avionics, Electrical & Air Data Systems Specialist. Qualified on: Falcon 900, CRJ-200, Dornier 328-100, Hawker 850XP and 1000, Lear 35, 45, 55 and 60, Gulfstream IV and 550, Embraer 135, Beech Premiere and 400A, MD-80.
April 10, 20233 yr Author The BBMF are calling this a Flying Training Device (FTD) as “simulator” does indeed open it up to a lot more RAF scrutiny. And obviously it does lack plenty of things to be a proper and full physical simulator. Edited April 10, 20233 yr by Spit40 Varjo Aero, 5090 FE, i9-12900K, 64GB Ram, RX Viper Rudder Pedals, AuthentiKit Controls + Fulcrum Yoke
April 10, 20233 yr 3 hours ago, Krakin said: Sounds like some of you didn't actually watched the video and rushed to comment..... you thought that too 😆 ? Dominique Simming since 1981 - [email protected] GHz with 16 GB of RAM and a 1080 with 8 GB VRAM running a 27" @ 2560*1440 - Windows 10 - Warthog HOTAS - MFG pedals - MSFS Standard version with Steam
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.