Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 hours ago, ha5mvo said:

Donno...How does the default 152 compare to the A2A stuff?

That's a bad comparison.

A better one would be the A310 to the A300.

Posted
14 hours ago, scotchegg said:

 No FM changes to the PC6 then?

No, unfortunately. I’m hoping eventually they’ll do for the PC6 what they’ve done for the TBM and also take advantage of the new opportunities in the 2024 FM too.

 

Posted
On 10/1/2024 at 10:01 AM, Beardyman said:

Disagree, both parties are responsible for fluid implementation of new patches. I am sure if ASOBO would give time and data well in advance to Navigraph guys they would manage.

here here

7800x3d+4090

JF Bae146+Arrows+F28, BS Dukes+Bonanza+KingAir, FSR500, Cows Da42, FX Hjet+Vision, FSW 414+Lear, FSS 175+P2006T, Fenix 320, PMDG DC6+7379+777, C22J, Milvis 310+Porter, SWS Kodiak+PC12+Zenith+RV14, BR Goose, IFE MB3339+F35.

 

Posted (edited)
17 hours ago, Krakin said:

Is is just me or does the A320v2 have vastly improved performance? If this is an indicator of how things will be with the A350 then we're in for a treat!

I have never flown this, not even once. Perhaps I should now but how do you and others feel it compares to FBW’s NEO that I do fly regularly?

Edited by RaptyrOne

GregH

Intel Core i7 14700K / Palit RTX4070Ti Super OC / Corsair 32GB DDR5 6000 MHz / MSI Z790 M/board / Corsair NVMe 9500 read, 8500 write / Corsair PSU1200W / CH Products Yoke, Pedals & Quad; Airbus Side Stick, Airbus Quadrant / TrackIR, 32” 4K 144hz 1ms Monitor

Posted
9 hours ago, RaptyrOne said:

I have never flown this, not even once. Perhaps I should now but how do you and others feel it compares to FBW’s NEO that I do fly regularly?

Fly it and compare it yourself. First hand experience is better than second.

Posted
On 10/3/2024 at 5:43 PM, Tuskin38 said:

Fly it and compare it yourself

As suggested, flying it now and not loving it. FBW cockpit and engine sounds are far nicer and the pax sound ambience is way more immersive. FBW EFB is nicer too. Seems a lot slower than the FBW to hit V1/R and climb rate is lower. (don’t know which is more accurate here tho). Also, no Navigraph Charts on the EFB that I can find. It may be more polished in some areas such as independent MCDU’s but not in others.

Also think FBW FPS is still significantly better. 

Just my opinion of course. Will go back to FBW. Don’t own Fenix.

 

 

 

 

GregH

Intel Core i7 14700K / Palit RTX4070Ti Super OC / Corsair 32GB DDR5 6000 MHz / MSI Z790 M/board / Corsair NVMe 9500 read, 8500 write / Corsair PSU1200W / CH Products Yoke, Pedals & Quad; Airbus Side Stick, Airbus Quadrant / TrackIR, 32” 4K 144hz 1ms Monitor

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, RaptyrOne said:

Also, no Navigraph Charts on the EFB that I can find

Because it's a default aircraft. They can't legally include that function.

2024 will have their own charts though.

Edited by Tuskin38

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...