25 minutes ago, aerostar said:

Wow...  X-PLANE turbulence  -  just wow ......

Wrong forum…. 

9 hours ago, GSalden said:

Wrong forum…. 

Why... ?   ... this is continuing on the OP's subject about LIMJ Genoa and its features....  a mention of Xplane doesn't take away from that...

He did ask for feedback...  in case you hadn't noticed the aircraft is flying into Genoa.

Edited October 30, 20241 yr by aerostar

Hey guys, thanks for all the feedback on this scenery. I love it! If I had to be critical, I'd say that the textures are a little 'simplistic' in areas but this is far outweighed by, what I believe is additional work on some of the surrounding scenery. Probably one of the most visually stunning approaches onto RWY28.  BTW, as cheap as chips from both Orbx and IniBuilds.

6 hours ago, aerostar said:

He did ask for feedback...  in case you hadn't noticed the aircraft is flying into Genoa.

Well, well, Howard asked for feedback from eventual owners of the BMW version of LIMJ for MSFS. Posting a 5-year old XP video doesn't really fit the bill ...

2 hours ago, SierraDelta said:

Well, well, Howard asked for feedback from eventual owners of the BMW version of LIMJ for MSFS. Posting a 5-year old XP video doesn't really fit the bill ...

"doesn't really fit the bill"   ... according to who...  You ???

Come on ladies, let's not get all grumpy on each other 

I have been close to pulling the trigger on this one over the past few days. Maybe my finger will twitch when I get home tonight

1 hour ago, Christopher Low said:

I have been close to pulling the trigger on this one over the past few days. Maybe my finger will twitch when I get home tonight

Like you Christopher, I'm a bit of a stickler for things. IMO, the scenery isn't up to the standard of the likes of Pyreegue or FT, but nevertheless it has stacks of atmosphere. For the price of a couple of pints I would definitely recommend it.

Edited October 30, 20241 yr by Rocky_53

16 minutes ago, Rocky_53 said:

Like you Christopher, I'm a bit of a stickler for things. IMO, the scenery isn't up to the standard of the likes of Pyreegue or FT, but it nevertheless it has stacks of atmosphere. For the price of a couple of pints I would definitely recommend it.

To be fair, very few are right up to the standard of FlyTampa or Pyreegue. However, as long as it is good enough, that's all that matters. The location looks really nice, and both approaches would be cool to fly.

Update 2.4.0 has already been released on ORBX. iniBuilds is silent for now.

 

On 10/12/2024 at 7:32 PM, Peter Z KCLE_EDDN said:

I love it. While it’s a bit dated of course, nothing beats the approach over the nicely modeled busy harbor. Makes for a great finish to the journey you so well described.

All good....but my LOC on 28 is off. Not sure what's with that....I love it otherwise...

8 hours ago, Flying-Hare said:

Update 2.4.0 has already been released on ORBX. iniBuilds is silent for now.

 

I have the version from the BMW site but that one is still v2.2….

Will ask the developer way it hasn’t been Updated .

6 hours ago, cyyzrwy24 said:

All good....but my LOC on 28 is off. Not sure what's with that....I love it otherwise...

... offset approach ?

30 minutes ago, GSalden said:

I have the version from the BMW site but that one is still v2.2….

Will ask the developer way it hasn’t been Updated .

Unfortunately, this specific developer is... a bit finicky with updates. It'll come, but there's a bit of a cautionary tale about him.

He started with a "membership" approach in which people were asked to pay a certain amount upfront with the promise of getting all of his airports present and future, with no limitations. At some point, he stopped updating them for a long period of time, ignoring complaints and releasing and updating airports on other marketplaces without giving them to his members. 

While that changed after several months and updates finally arrived for members as well, he then started this partnership with Amsim crafting himself an excuse to never give any new airports anymore to those who subscribed to the initial deal, which is honestly not a great look.

Now, to be fair, the deal of the membership was still pretty sweet, albeit his quality has been hit and miss, but the fact that he basically ghosted his members for several months and dodged the membership deal altogether with an excuse after a while isn't the best look and certainly has left some with a bitter taste. 

On the other hand, the update to Genoa finally makes it quite good for my taste. 

Edited October 31, 20241 yr by Abriael

22 minutes ago, Abriael said:

Unfortunately, this specific developer is... a bit finicky with updates. It'll come, but there's a bit of a cautionary tale about him.

He started with a "membership" approach in which people were asked to pay a certain amount upfront with the promise of getting all of his airports present and future, with no limitations. At some point, he stopped updating them for a long period of time, ignoring complaints and releasing and updating airports on other marketplaces without giving them to his members. 

While that changed after several months and updates finally arrived for members as well, he then started this partnership with Amsim crafting himself an excuse to never give any new airports anymore to those who subscribed to the initial deal, which is honestly not a great look.

Now, to be fair, the deal of the membership was still pretty sweet, albeit his quality has been hit and miss, but the fact that he basically ghosted his members for several months and dodged the membership deal altogether with an excuse after a while isn't the best look and certainly has left some with a bitter taste. 

On the other hand, the update to Genoa finally makes it quite good for my taste. 

That membership I have too. I wrote him an e-mail so let’s see what hij respond will be…

The forum no longer exists and the latest Free updates are from 2022 as far as I can see.

 

Edited October 31, 20241 yr by GSalden