SierraDelta

Maybe try here: https://www.fsdreamteam.com/forum/index.php/board,73.0.html

Agree, it is unbelievably brilliant now. WOW.

Right here: https://www.flightsimulator.com/aircraft-manuals/

The author was last seen on flightsim.to 2 years ago.

It’s a completely new product, so no.

Section 3.2 of the manual might help.

Works ok for me, MSFS booting up as well.

Okay, I got SimConnect logging going now. I'll do a flight later today and get back to you if I see any PSXT restarts.

Thanks Nico, I’ll do that.

Unfortunately, a serch for simconnect000.log yields no results.

22 milliseconds of Googling: https://github.com/MobiFlight/MobiFlight-WASM-Module

Nico, Just tested 7.8.4 on a short hop EHAM-EGLL in the Fenix A320. Unfortunately, there was still a restart due to Simconnect errors. On a positive note it happened after takeoff so not really immersion breaking. Log attached.

Sorry, but as has been proven several times in this thread it is realistic. Some real airframes have gaps here and there, others are perfectly aligned.

With photographic evidence to the contrary (as provided by @threexgreen) your assurances are only valid to you and nothing more.

Using PSXT 7.7.7 I tend to agree with those statements. While I think we all appreciate that the inclusion of 2 additional data providers has brought much needed improvements to places like ENGM, ESSA and LGAV, it seems to have come at a cost. Using EGLL as an example, it used to have absolutely brilliant coverage and performance, but now taxiing aircraft will often disappear and respawn a few seconds later while extending their gear. All movements used to be very fluid, but are now very often erratic, suddenly lurging forward at high speed, stopping and then resuming normal taxi speed. No doubt this is caused by errors in the data stream so Balthasar clearly still have work to do on the optimisation of the data stream. Oh yeah - a few days ago I spotted an Air New Zealand AT76 taxiing at EGLL T5 😉

Yes, but at a loss to the company. Quoting Andrew from a couple of weeks ago: ”Sales on P3D were never going to cover the cost of development; the focus is on MSFS and has been for sometime.”

Voted "don't care". Using TLOD 200 and PSXT with AIG models and no problems, 70 fps at Inibuilds EGLL.

Dead wrong. Yes, there are a number of very active posters who seem to be tweaking all day long. Personally, that stopped when I uninstalled P3D. I have never used any of the never-ending supply of various tools that promise sim nirvana - no AutoFPS, AutoLOD, Lossless Scaling etc., etc. I just fly every day - and enjoy it 😉

Right now £49.99 would be $63.12

Spotted a duplicate SIA388 at EGLL earlier. Here are a few lines from the log: BAW6NL G-EUYO LHR->LIN BAW A320 =c= AIGAIM_British Airways Airbus A320-200SL DAL31 N841MH JFK->LHR DAL B764 =1= AIGAIM_Delta Air Lines Boeing 767-400ER - Relay For Life AAL79 N735AT MIA->LHR AAL B77W =c= AIGAIM_American Airlines Boeing 777-300ER SIA317 9V-SKW LHR->SIN SIA A388 =1= AIGAIM_Singapore Airlines Airbus A380-800 QFA10 VH-ZND PER->MEL QFA B789 =1= AIGAIM_Qantas Boeing 787-9 - Yam Dreaming JBU20 N4083J JBU A21N =2= AIGAIM_jetBlue Airbus A321-200neo LR - Streamers Mint BAW16MT G-EUYB LHR->MRS BAW A320 =1= AIGAIM_British Airways Airbus A320-200 SIA317 9V-SKV SIN->LHR SIA A388 =1= AIGAIM_Singapore Airlines Airbus A380-800 BAW41YA G-DBCC LHR->LYS BAW A319 =u= AIGAIM_British Airways Airbus A319-100 - Gatwick IBE31TM EC-NER MAD->VIE IBE A20N =c= AIGAIM_Iberia Airbus A320-200neo BAW42Y G-DBCC LHR->LYS BAW A319 =u= AIGAIM_British Airways Airbus A319-100 - Gatwick After checking on FR24 both entries are wrong, correct would have been: SIA317 9V-SKV LHR->SIN SIA A388 =1= AIGAIM_Singapore Airlines Airbus A380-800

It looks perfectly right as that is user-configurable on first install. Can also be changed later by editing usercfg.opt Mine is (and has always been) D:\MSFS

Haha, that didn't age well 🙂

I prefer this one to the VirtualFRA version, building textures looks much more like the real thing. As for the AI problems I use PSXT/RealTraffic - works fine. VirtualFRA deleted, but of course when Jo Erland's version gets released things will change 🙂

How long did you wait? Mine loads fine right now, but does indeed spend some 30 seconds on that screen.

I agree, but it would seem that the OP disagrees …