June 15Jun 15 Bit late to the party, and I’ve never flown an airbus in real life, but I really like how these guys make a plane. Maybe one day they’ll get into Boeing. Performance is very good annd doesn’t detract from the overall experience. I also really appreciate how everything is integrated. The amount of detail is outstanding. Haven’t done any abnormals yet, but looking forward to it.That’s all. Just a praise post. Edited June 15Jun 15 by V1ROTA7E AMD 9950X3D | 64 GB RAM | RTX 5090 FMR: 747 FO, 757/767 CAPT, 737 Check Airman Current 777 CAPT
June 15Jun 15 I honestly don’t see how you say performance is really good. I have it. It’s flyable. But it is demonstrably the worst performing payware airplane I own. And I own a bunch. 5800X3D, 4090FE, 64GB DDR4 3600C16, Gigabyte X570S MB, EVO 970 M.2's, Alienware 3821DW and 2 22" monitors, Corsair RM1000x PSU, 360MM MSI MEG, MFG Crosswind, T16000M Stick, Boeing TCA Yoke/Throttle, Skalarki MCDU and FCU, Logitech Radio Panel/Switch Panel, Spad.Next
June 15Jun 15 If we are still alive when the Fenix version releases....it will surely have better performance and optimization than the FSL NEO. Asus Maximus X Hero Z370/ Windows 10 MSI Gaming X 1080Ti (2100 mhz OC Watercooled) 8700k (4.7ghz OC Watercooled) 32GB DDR4 3000 Ram 500GB SAMSUNG 860 EVO SERIES SSD M.2
June 15Jun 15 13 minutes ago, micstatic said:I honestly don’t see how you say performance is really good. I have it. It’s flyable. But it is demonstrably the worst performing payware airplane I own. And I own a bunch.The biggest complaint about the FSLabs is performance. Struggle with it on a 4090
June 15Jun 15 Author 3 hours ago, micstatic said:I honestly don’t see how you say performance is really good. I have it. It’s flyable. But it is demonstrably the worst performing payware airplane I own. And I own a bunch.Strange. I got it yesterday on my travel rig and it performs really well, far better than the original release on my main rig. Granted it's got a 5080 and settings are a combo of off/medium/high. AMD 9950X3D | 64 GB RAM | RTX 5090 FMR: 747 FO, 757/767 CAPT, 737 Check Airman Current 777 CAPT
June 16Jun 16 I have FSL A321Neo and it is huge on performance…But I don’t have a lot of VRAM maybe (RTX4070 with 12 Go of VRAM)My Fenix is well more FPS friendly
June 16Jun 16 Leftis posted on 30th May that FSL are working on an update that includes performance improvements, however he also posted on 11th June: "The performance improvements will come when the modeling turns to 2024 native mode - a longer-term process which I've discussed in the past if you read my previous texts. I will, however, say that the most notable improvement will be if you up your RAM to 64GB which will feel totally different for you - I understand that's not something everyone can subscribe to, at this time, but it's the honest reply." FS2024 • PMDG 738, 77F • FSL A321 • A2A Comanche, Aerostar • BS Baron, Bonanza, Caravan Pro • JF Tomahawk • TAOG H500C BeyondATC • GSX Pro • ChasePlane & Flow Pro • TDS GTNXi • FSUIPC • AutoFPS • RealTurb 9800X3D B650E • ROG OC RTX 5090 • 64GB DDR5-6000 • VKB Gladiator, STECS, T-Rudder • Tobii 5 • ISP 1 Gbps
June 16Jun 16 Commercial Member I have no problem with the FSL on MSFS 2024 with my 8Gb 3060Ti but I don't run extreme simulator settings either. It's all about compromise I guess. Developer of Self-Loading Cargo - The Cabin Crew and Passenger Simulation Addon for MSFS, X-Plane, P3D and FSX
June 16Jun 16 I run 64gb ram with a 4090 already and the fslabs is still the worst performer in my hangar by a mile. Hopefully the 2024 native version will help. But like I said earlier. Even considering all that, the plane is still flyable. 5800X3D, 4090FE, 64GB DDR4 3600C16, Gigabyte X570S MB, EVO 970 M.2's, Alienware 3821DW and 2 22" monitors, Corsair RM1000x PSU, 360MM MSI MEG, MFG Crosswind, T16000M Stick, Boeing TCA Yoke/Throttle, Skalarki MCDU and FCU, Logitech Radio Panel/Switch Panel, Spad.Next
Create an account or sign in to comment