micstatic

Exactly. I've downloaded a ton of livery's and it's a mess trying to find certain planes. Also it's not snobbery. MOST have moved on to 2024 because it's the natural evolution of 2020. Most addons can simply be copied over and used. We are at a time in flight sim when most developers are not releasing new 2020 planes/scenery anymore. A developer releasing addons for both platforms is forced to make sacrifices as well as double up on development time. For the user, it's messy also. I look forward to bluebird going full 2024. I have nothing against those who do not want to upgrade. Everybody has their own choices to make.

The biggest issue I have with the 757 right now is the unorganized mess with livery's in the menu's. I don't know if that's just a limitation because they are including support for 2020. Hopefully when future releases are 2024 only it gets better.

I'd much rather see a inibuilds CLT.

yeah I've been flying the 757 exclusively since release. Really like it. Love the free acars addon on flightsim.to. Really neat

yeah. Nice to see them chipping away at it. I see they added a throttle lockout which is a nice quality of life feature. wasn't an earthshattering update, but not bad either.

Not that I noticed. But I use spad for custom controls.

update worked fine for me. Installed the new nest. Then once in nest updated the aircraft. Flying the aircraft now

I would have preferred some of the focus they did on the terminal interior to have been applied to the airside area

I'm getting jaggy borders on the centerline stripes

I saw that their was a 2nd orbx BOS update yesterday. Is that the patch?

I like addon linker better. Simple. search by code. If I ever need to, I just use the view map function.

Yeah I like those as well. I can understand why a singular "score" IE landing rate is appealing to some. But I'm sure there are many people in this hobby who would rater land half way down the runway and butter it on, then have a somewhat firm landing in the TDZ. So I'm with you.

Wish they would just embed this in the contrail config settings

I can’t speak if they lost etops status. But generally delta is using them on shorter routes where their increased fuel burn is less pronounced. Some exceptions. But a lot of Atlanta to Florida and similar ones now. They also said a few times recently they don’t like operating narrowbody’s on long flights like those across the pond

My first flight will probably be Jackson hole to Atlanta.

I set wing just two views that take place form the cabin. One of each wing. Or sometimes from the front of the engine. Typically I'll get as close to the window as possible for the preset. Ideally with no window or cockpit showing. But that's me. I get it. I'd rather have a nice looking cabin than not. But not if it comes at the expense of performance. But it's long down the list for me.

What do you guys actually do in the cabin where it’s that important to you? Other than viewing it once

Exactly. G force is the better measure in my opinion. Landing trackers like Volanta can be helpful. But the way they calculate landing rate is not the best.

The flap sounds alone are absolutely perfect. I've flown well over 200 flights in my life on Delta 757's. Such a familiar sound.

I am not a fan of honeywell avionics. So I find flying the ejet a chore.

you will love it. Somebody once told me the most fun flight sim flights are the ones I normally wouldn't do. I tend to agree with the advice. Cusco Peru was a prime example of that.

I can't get online at the moment. Does it include hardware binding LVAR's and such?

I don't have any blackbird stuff. So not sure about that. But Contrail/Inimanager work well enough for me. ORBX most of the time.

I’m not a fan of marketplace in anyway. No purchase receipts, lack of ability to edit airports when necessary, slow downloads, bad ui. I’m team addon linker.

I only fly to payware airports also. I mean it adds it to payware also. You also can manually add custom deals on a per gate basis if you wish