Jump to content

Fry777

Frozen-Inactivity
  • Content Count

    57
  • Donations

    $0.00 
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Fry777

  1. This setting is to make sure he was CPU limited, and not GPU limited. Had he been putting this slider to the right, it would have been harder to represent the jump in GPU load optimisation. Admittedly, what that means is that we'll see less of a FPS boost with our settings but a far better distribution of load which is great news still (along with the disappearance of stutters!)
  2. https://forums.flightsimulator.com/t/major-aerodynamic-bug-induced-drag-and-parasitic-drag/411364 So this person just found that the induced drag is wrongly influencing the parasitic drag. If true, this would need a bit more visibility and upvotes, that's why I wanted to post it here. What are your thoughts on this ?
  3. Thank you both for your replies. I heard about the Fulcrum yoke, that's why I wanted to have a comparison with this one first 😉
  4. Hello, I've just stumbled upon the website for this yoke : https://www.proyoke.com/ I can't find any reviews online... The specifications read "Powered by AGRONN Technology" and the reviews about Agronn are generally very good. However these mainly cover the column yokes, which I suspect use a different technology than this desk-clamped one (springs ?) On ths plus, it's made of cast aluminum with 180° roll travel. On the downside the photo from the side shows a rather limited throw of the yoke (10 cm ?) Anyone uses it ? Or heard about it ?
  5. You surely meant 8 months, right ? (and I'm not claiming the pics I found were the first ones released)
  6. No, I clearly remember seeing pictures of helicopters, european countries, etc... at least 6 months before FSX release.Just as a proof, here's a link from february 2006, have a look at the title of the FSX preview pictures (Switzerland, France...) :http://forum.simflig...t-of-this-week/And you can find many more on the net. It's a fact, the PR for Flight is NOT the same as the PR for FSX. I agree with Jacoba, some people just want to make a point by changing history and trying to convince us that the PR for Flight is the equivalent of the PR for FSX we had months before release. It's simply not the case. Now, there might indeed be the entire world pictured in Flight, and eventually we might all be happy... but what they're doing here -again, from a PR point of view- is nonsense. We are not speaking about a movie trailer, which has to be a right blend of teasing you with bits of scenes/dialogue and leaving you wanting to see more of the story, we are speaking about a sim (or game, as you want ) with no storyline.It's not as if they could spoil us by showing pictures of London or Paris, or even jets, right ? On the contrary, it would only feed our urge to switch to have a serious look at this new version and eventually switch as soon as it's released. What I'm just wondering is :- What is their goal by releasing only pics of Hawaï and the same planes all over again ?- Would there be any negative effect of showing pictures of the worldwide scenery now ? (there must be another area of the world which is complete by now)- Is there any marketing strategy other than to say "tadaaaaa !" a few weeks/days before release when they finally show us pictures of the Flight world ? (which is really some kind of a PR joke) The only 2 answers I can get to now are either Flight is going to be initially a Flight Unlimited type of sim (with future region addons sold in the marketplace most probably), or that we were completely fooled about the release date, and the game is still in very early development stage (...then looking at a possible 2013 release) If someone has better answers to these questions, which are often overlooked on this recurrent topic, feel free to share Deniz
  7. Al,I have this excellent aircraft (-100 version) but was reluctant to buy the Freighter one since the FDE is the same than that of the 100 (so it means getting an underpowered plane at the weights used for the 200F). Can you point me to the tweaking guides you talk about please ?Deniz
  8. Thanks, Robert !Does the gold star come with a beta test entry right ? :( :(
  9. Great update ! Did anyone noticed the Vertical Situation Display in the penultimate picture ? :( Denis
  10. Hello !Is there a way someone could do a repaint of Cargo-B airlines and Air Cargo Germany for the FSX version of the Queen please ?I'd love to fly them from Brussels and Hahn airport ! :)Thank you so much,Deniz
  11. Hello BryanA few weeks ago, I asked you if there'd be a voice edition of FS2Crew for the MD-11 (and the 747X), you told me that it depended on the success of the default 737 version.Without revealing any commercial info, can you tell us if the latter was considered a success and if you have decided that you will port these types of version over the MD-11 & 747X ?Thanks a lotDeniz
  12. I would like to thank Serdar Nuzhet for his wonderful LTBA 2009 scenery for FSX ! :)I heard that AES will be included for this freeware airport ?? That would be great :)Thanks,Deniz
  13. That would be really great ! :) (and for the MD-11 too :()Wish you the best,Deniz
  14. Il faut attendre la fin de l'année pour la version Mega Airport d'Aerosoft qui elle claquera c'est sûr, au vu de la qualité des autres Mega Airport :)Deniz
  15. Hello allI just bought the Ejets CD version... runs really nice, very enjoyable airplane...But when I installed it I noticed the filename of the installer was "Ejets_FSX_v15" so that means that it is the SP1.5... and there is a SP1.6 available at Wilco's website.The problem is, Wilco states it is for the download version only :http://www.wilcopub.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=support_ejetsWhere can I download the SP1.6 for the CD version ?When I try to go to the downloads section of Wilco's website, it asks for an email + password which I don't have (even though I registered the product)Thanks for your helpDeniz
  16. Hello all,I found one of their developper website, and he states that they resumed working on it :http://www.metzgergva.de/default_e.htmBut apparently this time it would be a CRJ700/900...10-01-2009 Not much happened in terms of flightsim on my side. After the Fokker we at Digital Aviation have started to work on the CRJ 700/900. So this is now in the phase of having designed the first basic layout of the flight dynamics.Deniz
  17. http://www.phoenix-simulation.co.uk/Well, what do you think of that ? :( Deniz
  18. BonjourPeux tu préciser de quels problèmes il s'agit stp ? :)Merci !
  19. I know someone who is a very good painter. I will ask him :)By the way, could you tell me where did you find this Boeing print ? Are there others available from Boeing for other airlines ?Deniz
  20. Hello,Do you know if there are any updates for the E-jets addon - boxed version ? Because on Wilco's site it states that the update is for the download version only :http://www.wilcopub.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=support_ejetsThanks,Deniz
  21. Fly The Maddog 2008 pro (well, maybe not for christmas, but for the end of deecmber as they say...)Deniz
  22. Hello PMDGIs it possible to have a complete list of the failures possible with the MD-11 ? I know there are a lot, like 150, but it would be very interesting...I wanted to know specifically if you can get a fuel related failure (fuel leak for example)ThanksDeniz
×
×
  • Create New...