riccardo74

Mine takes about 3:50m including GSX, very heavy in my opinion, too many objects.

In effect you are right, during cockpit preparation you can wait for AIGTC to load.

I've tried both method: 1) Launch FSHud, then AIGTC, then FS2024 (in FSHud checked External source, in AIGTC checked "Use with FSHud") 2) Launch FSHud then FS2024 (in FSHud checked "enable AIG" and nothing else) 1) method seems to inject more active aircraft than 2) method. Parked aircrafts are about the same. The problem is that AIGTC takes 5:52sec to load! I've installed all world's flightplans. Is it normal? is there a way to reduce its loading time? In my opinion is better the 2) method untill not find a "fix" to reduce loading time of AIGTC.

Thank you very much for your effort!! great tool!

Hi, now I'm using one of two method. Is it better together? AIG+External? And do you launch AIGTC or not? I noted that if you don't launch AIGTC the traffic is injected anyway. What is your configuration in AIGTC and FSHud? thanks so much in advance.

The Basepack installs all available flightplans for airlines inside the package or is better to download other ones? I use it with FSHud and airports seems to be not fullu populated.

I resolved switching off Real-Time Protection under Windows Security. Worked perfectly.

Hi, I'm trying to download Base Package but seems like it can't download anything, after 2 hours I get "Downloading bar" running and in my community folder no aig folder was created. Any ideas?

That's the question I'd like to be answered.

But now is not possible to install 3rf party addon like payware aurcraft or ATC addon. Once solve also this step, that could be a very great and final solution.

@MattNischan Completely agree with you. I hope in the next addon updates become to change something.

I completely unistalled fs2020 after have been considering all aircraft (pmdg 777 and fenix) work. I honestly woukd unistall 2020, it's a waste of hdd space vs 2024.

As I said before, I think I'll subscribe to the monthly subscription (navdata + charts) for €11.04 for just one month. I usually buy one cycle per year and fly with that cycle for a entire year. It would be better to subscribe to just navdata for €36.34 per year, but in my opinion, the changes from one month to the next are so insignificant that it's not worth it. Once the subscription expires, I'll fly with "AIRAC OUT OF DATE" warning in the FMC of my airplanes (I'll get over it), and I'll use the free charts from Flight Simulator 2024. I respect all your opinions because they show me different approaches to this hobby, which is becoming increasingly expensive year after year.

Hi Ray, I don't have now an active subscriptio (my expired last august 2024), click on your account and at the end of the page you will find: Get a Navigation Data Subscription maybe this link is active only if your subscription has expired. I can get only navdata for 36,34€\year

I also think Navigraph is an excellent service, but for someone like me who doesn't use it regularly but wants to use a few cycles a year and not all the cycles monthly, it's a bit of a waste of money. There are some months when I don't use the simulator at all, and in those months when I don't fly, I wouldn't use it. That's why I was saying that if there was the possibility of synchronizing the various add-ons with the Microsoft database too, it would be excellent in my case. Anyway, thanks for all your opinions; they're all very interesting and help us simmers understand the various points of view.