Jump to content

spesimen

Members
  • Content Count

    1,080
  • Donations

    $10.00 
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

127 Excellent

1 Follower

About spesimen

  • Rank
    Member - 1,000+
  • Birthday 03/13/1973

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://www.soundclick.com/spesimen
  • ICQ
    0

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    san frandisco

Flight Sim Profile

  • Commercial Member
    No
  • Online Flight Organization Membership
    none
  • Virtual Airlines
    No

Recent Profile Visitors

4,484 profile views
  1. hmm, i learned on the pmdg tutorial also. first with the original v1 747 and then with the ngx. they look intimidating because of the old school calculator interface. it can seem cryptic because some of the shorthand abbreviations and flow aren't immediately obvious. but really it is just like a flight planning app that has a list of waypoints and lets you adjust/edit them, and pick approaches etc. that's really just about it! most have places to enter some important information about your fight like weights and intended speeds and so forth that help it calculate correctly. once you get the hang of it they are actually quite easy to use. good luck! cheers, -andy crosby
  2. TOPER is another alternative. toper-web.com ....its not very full featured, doesn't support de-rates. but it does sel temp. i use it for -600 and -900 which are not included in TOPCAT. not the best alternative but it works well enough. i need to try out qsimplanner. or finally make the switch to p3d so i can use the NGXu :) cheers,-andy crosby
  3. thanks dave. really interesting to read! cheers,-andy crosby
  4. just curious but do you have a citation for this? the situation you describe doesn't seem like something that the president (or the vice pres for that matter) normally has control over. i couldn't really find any specific bills or news items regarding this either. wouldn't decisions like this happen at the procurement level like with congressional budgeting? cheers,-andy crosby
  5. well, it's easy enough to reproduce if you are curious to see it. check out the other thread i linked there is a much more specific example with high CI and weights. i don't know precisely why the situation where it blanks out all of the calculations in the STAR is different than the "Unable/unacheiaveable" messages but i've seen both behaviors. i think the latter errors show up when you can correctly calculate the descent but then deviate too much from it, whereas the blanked entries occur if you have not yet started/calculated the descent and it is simply unable to calculate it due to the ambiguity i mentioned earlier. i believe in practice it is somewhat rare as it requires a STAR with a speed restriction and also an unusually aggressive CI, in the other example thread it was because the last waypoint before the star was commanding a 330 knot descent followed by a 280 restriction only a few nm later. with a more conservative CI the descent is already going to be in the 280 neighborhood. happy flying cheers,-andy crosby
  6. check your descent speed.... often it can be too high with a high cost index. the behavior you describe can occur if it is set too high/fast for the the aircraft to be able to meet the numerous speed and altitude restrictions that are in that STAR... you can get into a state where it is ambiguous because you are telling it to go one speed but it can't hit the restriction and do the commanded speed at the same time so it blanks out the calculations. typically for a STAR like that where there is a hard speed limit it can be helpful to set that speed in the descent page instead of using the econ value (set it to 280/.78 for example). alternatively setting a lower cost index that results in an econ value that is closer to the restriction is also possible.. there is another thread about it here from some time ago. happy flying! cheers,-andy crosby
  7. just for reference, FSX sold at least a million copies just in the first year of release (according to wikipedia) and it's been active for more than a decade.. dovetail sold at least 600,000 copies and that was several years later (albeit at reduced prices).. those are the only numbers i could find online but that's a pretty decent amount. (edit: i found another ancient reference from a 2003 post on avsim that claimed they had sold 22 million copies of the various versions of the franchise, before the 2002 version of the sim was out and that 2002 sold 1.7-2.2 mil...) i think the potential sales numbers are possibly much higher than you are theorizing . the new one looks so amazing that it has been getting tons of press over the mainstream gaming sites not just on enthusiast ones like avsim.. cheers,-andy crosby
  8. somebody from ign asked the devs about that. “In general, whenever an area is blurred in Bing, or is otherwise restricted, we will use procedural techniques to fill in the blanks. Those areas won’t be fully authentic, but we will have something that generally fits into the area.” article here: https://www.ign.com/articles/2019/10/08/how-will-microsoft-flight-simulator-deal-with-what-governments-dont-want-you-to-see cheers, -andy crosby
  9. maybe check that your CLB page has reasonable settings for the rate. if you have max rate set it will probably do full thrust the whole way. maybe try to override it from econ to just 280/.76 . ....an unusually high cost index setting might have a similar effect maybe.
  10. a few quick suggestions would be, is the autothrottle and both FDs engaged? in that case and with lnav/vnav engaged your throttle should follow the prescribed power pretty much on it's own so i'd check those first. is your vertical path looking like it is supposed to in the FMC? well, so one thing that nobody wants to hear of course is did you try flying the tutorials, but they are pretty good at hitting every step. if you have the issue with even following them exactly, it might be something with your setup. maybe check that your settings in the FMC setup menus so that your throttle isn't overriding the prescribed power if you accidentally tap it to full. perhaps if you post a screenshot of your instruments it might be easier to point out if there is any unusual or missing settings. good luck! -andy crosby
  11. if you're interested in saving time and not tweaking i'd suggest just getting the steam version of fsx and not messing around with trying to install the old version. it is significantly more stable and bug-free and will also most likely install seamlessly on a win10 machine without any fuss. i'd also advise to stick with win10. a lot of newer hardware will require it to take full advantage. and win7 support is gone for good in 6 months or so, so you'll have to look at upgrading anyway if you want to keep your machine secure good luck! cheers,-andy crosby
  12. i don't know how to fix your issue but on mine it seems to show the correct runways cheers,-andy crosby
  13. you didn't mention if you're only interested in airliners... most of the A2A planes also qualify for 'study-level' status, in particular the engine/oil simulation and management is very sophisticated on their products. they tend to be quite good on performance too. cheers,-andy crosby
  14. preferences->camera->cinematic mode->auto-enable slider. you can use the slider to adjust the time delay before it turns on the mode or you can turn it off by setting the slider to the leftmost position (it will say "Auto-Enable Disabled") cheers,-andy crosby
  15. those screenshots look pretty nice, can't imagine what it must be like in full 3d. cool! cheers,-andy crosby
×
×
  • Create New...