Jump to content

Vali

Members
  • Content Count

    237
  • Donations

    $0.00 
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

31 Neutral

About Vali

  • Rank
    Member

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Flight Sim Profile

  • Commercial Member
    No
  • Online Flight Organization Membership
    VATSIM
  • Virtual Airlines
    Yes

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. I would prefer a real optimization from Asobo instead of introducing a slider for LOD, for example... which is practically then on user side to match with his hardware (like the other graphic settings). Giving more fps not by real optimizations but by the means of loosing on visuals is not a progress really. Optimization means, at least for me, using the same settings (eg. between SU4 and SU5) and getting the same visuals quality but more fps/faster loading times.
  2. Here it is @ryanbatcund. The problem on my side is that after I put it to OFF, next time when I go to this section is ON again, it resets every time very annoying.
  3. I turn it off on my side but it is still visible, then is again always ON. No idea why but it is annyoing. Should I edit the texture config ( eg. on my FB A320)? I see always D-NVAR even if I turn off the Show Tail Number.
  4. One question guys, I have a new Samsung 970 Pro 512GB NVMe and an old Samsung 960 Pro 512GB NVMe where P3D is installed since end of 2017. Should I use the new one (supposedly better) to the P3D or to the Win10? (and then the old one will get the Win or stay with P3D) What will benefit the most? Thanks.
  5. It will be ok to let us choose, yes. I will keep TPM disabled for now. I converted all my partitions to GPT, but the Windows partition was already GPT. The tool gave an warning because not all of them were GPT. But I am not sure if I want to be an early adopter :), probably not.
  6. I think I have to select FTPM, other option which is "Discrete" seems to mean "disabled". Any risks for data loss later or risk to not recognize the SSDs/HDDs? When I switched from Intel x299 to X570 for AMD I could not access initially the data from my SSDs and lost the Raid boot.
  7. I am not sure if the tool recognizes the AMD TPM on my side (in Bios is on Discrete, the alternative is Firmware TPM).
  8. I have used as basis the settings from Chewwy. But I have raised them (I had a look at Q8Pilot settings who has a RTX 3090, so almost similar in performance with the 3080Ti, same chip, only the VRAM is twice as much) and I have noticed not such a big loss, is still mostly above 30fps. He uses 1440p though. The difference between 1080p and 4K is the GPU task 🙂, the CPU makes not a big difference anymore. So I will put the 3080Ti to the paces 🙂 Regards, Vali
  9. I do not pursuit it 🙂 Just wanted to know if it is plausible/achievable. 30 stable fps are just fine at 4K 🙂 and I get around 40. After some settings now limitation is on the GPU. I just want to optimize and have some buffer, no idea what 3rd party addons will bring. Yes, looking forward for that update.
  10. Hello guys, I have updated my PC from the i9-7900x and EVGA 1080 Ti FTW3 to the AMD Ryzen 5900X and EVGA RTX 3080 Ti FTW3 Ultra. With the A320 at default EDDN, I get some 40+ fps (at 4K, not all settings to max). Usually I see that in Dev Mode it says that it is limited more by the main thread. The CPU load is at 22-25% (5900X is in OC) and GPU between 90-95%. Can be achieved in this configuration 60 stable fps? I mean are my settings too high for 60 fps with this system or have to tweak somewhere else? Thanks! These settings are also used by Chewwy with the RTX 3080.
  11. Great stuff Rob. I selected the 5900X in the end, it is still above the 10900K and 11900K in the multi-core and single-core tests. I saw so many reviews and test results before making my decision, most of them end with avoid the 11900K. By the way, I have noticed that userbenchmark is so biased towards Intel, my PC now is much more performant than my previous 7900x system but it gets much lower test results... I think 5900X due to less cores has a little bit more OC margin compared with the 5950X. Still, both are the best at the moment. Lets see the new Intel Adler architecture what will bring. I was coming from a 7900X (x299 platform) because the socket got damage... And I have ordered the 3080 Ti FTW3 which makes more sense than the 3090.
  12. Last version is 6.70 from Garmin, last one supported by Flight1 is 6.62... I suppose I have to update manually the database... hopefully it works. A reminder to me to avoid future add-ons or products from Flight1. At some point I will switch to Rxp.. but I will loose all my previous GTN configs...
  13. 🙂 I will call them little glitches now. I did not see this kind of great promoting screenshots before release. I mean.. those can really ruin the experience sometimes.. 😞
  14. Yes, the scenery vectors are on Ultra, most of the settings are on high or ultra. I hope they will filter or improve this in the future, aerial screenshots and views are nice but the ground details are annoyingly affected by this.
×
×
  • Create New...