avistudent

Coverage from Australia for their upcoming AUS update...

I have 14900KF, with DDR4, and it runs MSFS2024 and VR paired with 9070XT, it runs very well without any hicups. The chip overclocks very well and as long as you are feeding enough power, at vcore 1.24, it overclocks Pcore at 6.0 or 6.1 with Ecores at 4.5, but i run the Pcores at 5.9 and Ecores at 4.5 and I am happy with it. It does run hot, but if you have a good aircooling or watercooling, it will be fine. DDR5 ram right now is very expensive, so AMD, I would rule it out if you want to upgrade during this time.

You system setup is not bad. I am currently using Q3 and the experience is not bad, as long as your settings are in the high and with some ultra settings, and setting some environments to low. I am currently using Virtual Desktop for the wireless connection. Using AUTO FPS will help with the VRAM issue. No sure with SU4 now, but i was able to use Frame Generation before in VR with usercfg. I do have rolling cache set at 110GB on a different drive. As for the frame rate in VR, i can achieve close to 75 to 80FPS, with about 85ish latency to 90s using detailed airports with inibuilds A350, PMDG 777 and BravoAirspace 787, ...however, FBW A380 is still heavy on my machine. My setup is a i9 14900KF, 9070 XT with 64GB....i am in Toronto BTW

Depending on your personal preference, Samsung's curved monitors has a higher curvature of 180 degrees to 190 degrees, do take your pick!

Yeah, in VR, I need Frame Gen to get good experience in VR, MSFS2024, locking it at 36FPS for 72Hz in the Q3, and using Virtual Desktop, i am achieving 70FPS to 72 consistently, with 100ms to 80ish on the ground for latency. I have reduced it to 83% for horizonal and lateral FOV. While TAA is what I really liked because of the text clarity, but the FPS is like 30ish and 140 to 150ms latency. Using InibuildsA350, FBW380, PMDG 777W and F, conservative settings, ultra clouds, high texture res, most ground airport traffic off except road, other settings are at medium and i have those ground rocks and stuff to low besides buildings...

Yeah, if you are going to need to get a new MOBO and RAM, I would consider AMD as well, 7800X3D. I am on the same boat, planning to go to AMD, possibly for 9800X3D since I do VR as well. I currently using 14600K. with 9070 XT, 64GB...this combo is still pretty strong with MSFS 2024 using inibuilds A350 with custom airports, with Frame Generation,...TAA...not so much, but oh well.... it does a decent job with Virtual Display. MSFS2020 is not bad too incase that is what you are using...

Your TAA is the issue, if you select AMD FSR then your FPS should increase, combine it with your DLSS FG. Once you lock your frame rate, MSFS will stays that way, and FG will do the rest of the work. Your other setting are fine. Also, if you are comfortable, you can mess around the settings in UserCfg.opt For the power, is the card using the 600w power connection direct to the PSU? i am assuming you are not using any adaptor to convert 600w using 3 pcie 8 pin connections.

wow that is wonderful....how can Asobo let that slipped and released to the general public.

I have a 9070 xt and it runs very well in both 2D and VR in MSF2024 with a Quest 3. In VR you just need to do some tweaking and be realistic on your settings, then all is good. I am also using Virtual Display as well.

Yeah, it shouldn't need to do that. Under normal operation, once power on, if all specs are good and running altogther with stable current/power, it should just on and stays on. If restarts happens, it is either the power how interrupted due to high overclock settings (insufficient power) or MAY BE some component incompatibility (like RAM)....I am assuming you have a clean OS to being with? But if you have been using your existing hardware with 4090 without issues, then it may be the PSU

i am not a 5090 owner, but based on your specs and power on symptoms, i think you may need at 1200w or slightly higher PSU to give it a trial and error shot.

With Virtual Desktop, all you needed to do is to load VD first and then your SteamVR app, make sure to set SteamVR for your VD OpenXR runtime. And that is all. You then load the MSFS2024 within Steam VR. I believe i had to do that for F1 2025 and as well as XP12. But xbox MSFS is much easier, i just load VD and then MSFS.

There differences won't be much different comparing NVME 3.0 to 4.0, however, if you are moving to 5.0, then you MAY see some better loading times. Also, keep in mind that you have to get top of the line NVME drives to go to the top speed rather than the lower end NVMEs. I am referring to SAMSUNG EVO or PRO or WD Black or similar, Just look for the highest transfer speed for that drive size. 4TB drives are still expensive, i personally would stick with 2TB, i have majority of my system drives in NVMEs, and I am happy with my setup. For games, I have a WD Black 850X (MSFS), SN770 for C:\ i would consider Samsung PRO or similar performing line if the price is right. I also have an ADATA SX8200 for other games

I would put the MSFS2024 with a NVME instead of SSD. Personally, i have the OS and MSFS and other Community and Cache in separate NVMEs and everything seems to run faster. But that just me, others will say it is excessive, but NVME 1TB prices are pretty good these days compared to SSD, and NVME is much faster

Hmmm, my 2024 VR experience is pretty decent using virtual desktop, with frame generation enabled. Not TAA thou. Experience has been stable so far with my AMD 9070 XT and quest 3, and run with AutoFPS....yes VRAM sucks big time