Jump to content

qqwertz

Members
  • Content Count

    1,567
  • Donations

    $125.00 
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by qqwertz

  1. We just watched Salvation, a TV show from 2017. I think it was episode 2: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt6684314/?ref_=ttep_ep2 The show is about diverting a meteor from hitting Earth. And guess what: they need an EM drive to accomplish that, and that drive uses the Casimir effect. Just what Buhler is promoting 😄
  2. Thanks for this post, Terry. I was considering to buy my first CS model for MSFS, but not with a KingAir flight model. That's really a bummer. Peter
  3. I understood Dave that P2ATC will use Voice Access in the future, but using its own instance of it. If that is correct, there would be a significant internal change in how P2ATC recognizes voice, but nothing will change on the outside. Maybe Dave can clarify that point.
  4. [1] Yes, they do. But generally forces need some source of energy to be created, and Buhler claims a new type of force that does not require an energy source. [2] The commonly accepted view in the physics community is that gravity is distortion of space. It corresponds to a measurable effect of space-time curvature, not the cause. The cause of curvature is energy (there is a bit more to it, but energy is the dominating source). Since electromagnetic fields contain energy, they do indeed distort space. However, the effect of is generally tiny compared to that of the rest energy E = m c2 of an object of mass m.
  5. I just saw that it works on another site: https://www.sim-outhouse.com/sohforums/showthread.php/135009-Hercules-fans-you-ain-t-gonna-believe-this?p=1334064&viewfull=1#post1334064
  6. Bought it today and love it 🙂
  7. I scanned through his presentation at the APEC conference (which is not a major scientific conference). He starts with solid physics, but becomes sketchy when he talks about the interesting parts. I am always a bit cautious when people found companies around an idea that has not passed peer review, and they promise big breakthroughs. There is now an entire industry around start-up companies that appeal to high-risk high-gain investors. I would count the Boom supersonic jet as one example, and that one is on much firmer ground than this propulsion idea. I personally will not invest into Buhler's company 🙂 Peter
  8. Ah, most informative. I will then wait until Voice Access will be used in P2ATC. Can't wait for this to happen, I really miss using P2ATC 🙂
  9. Thanks for chiming in Dave. I have tried speech training excessively, both within and outside of P2ATC, to no avail. However, I might have turned on Windows speech recognition while using P2ATC. I will try it again without speech recognition. Peter
  10. Ah, good. That speech recognition never understood me (even when I spoke very clearly, and very simple sentences) and is the single reason why I don't use P2ATC anymore. My hope would be that P2ATC will use something else soon.
  11. Yep, that's very much personal preference. I personally would say that MSFS Premium is good enough for most purposes. Add a few freeware airports, the free FBW A320, and perhaps some payware airports that you really like, and you're good to go. If you want good ATC, you should look into Vatsim, PilotEdge, SayIntentions, or BeyondATC (not available yet). I you want good charts, you should get a Navigraph subscription. And if you want outstanding aircraft, you should get payware airplanes from A2A, Fenix, PMDG, Milviz/Blackbird, and some other companies. But, unlike P3D, you do not have to invest first in weather, scenery, and payware aircraft to make the sim pretty and interesting. Peter
  12. We had almost perfect weather in New Brunswick. Only a single cloud, and guess where that cloud moved only seconds after totality started. Luckily, the cloud was not very thick, so we could still see corona and flares. Plus, we could see rainbow colours in that cloud shortly before and after totality. We couldn't see any stars near the Sun, though. It was a great experience. Peter
  13. We will go to New Brunswick, forecast is perfect: clear and warm (+11C). We will bring a wide-view telescope with an attached camera to take high-precision photos. Plus binoculars and glasses. Peter
  14. Amazing. Great job, Ray. And what a cool story, I didn't know about the Concorde chasing an eclipse. For everyone who is as word not allowed of it as I was, here is a web page on this flight: https://airwaysmag.com/concorde-chased-solar-eclipse/
  15. Correct. We'll need a good camera and telescope for that, but in the worst case we will end up with nice photos of the corona 🙂. We are still working on the details, but we have some reasonably good telescopes. I've seen the March 2015 partial eclipse as well in Germany. And the eclipse of August 2017, but only in my hometown in Nova Scotia, i.e., for away from the path of totality. We made a big party and invited people to watch the silhouette of the Moon, it was really nice. But it was only about 5-10% coverage, you couldn't notice any change in daylight. The one in 2015 was much more memorable.
  16. I have witnessed a total solar eclipse in 1999 in Germany, but it was cloudy. I turned dark for 2 minutes, that was it. We have plans to go to New Brunswick for the upcoming eclipse, but only if the weather forecast is fine. We may try to take an image of the Sun through a telescope and see if we can verify the bending of light rays by the Sun ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eddington_experiment ). Unfortunately, we only have a 25% chance for the sky to be clear in early April there 😐. Peter
  17. I am actually in the same boat. I hardly fly military jets at all, but this one has grown on me because of its beauty. Also, it might be fun to develop some training missions for it. Think of a river run like in Top Gun Maverick. As I mentioned before, maneuvers and loop-the-loops in VR are absolutely stunning, gives you even more appreciation for what fighter pilots accomplish.
  18. It is a really beautiful plane (I am on the beta team) and fun to fly. I enjoy it especially in VR, it can make you dizzy to fly over a hill at low altitude with 450 Kts. It is a Shrike product, they do not aim for system depth, and this will for sure be reflected in the price (which I don't know yet). However, as the video shows, you can start from cold and dark and you have some systems to play with. Like fighter jets in general, you need to be careful with the throttle on approach and not drop velocity too much, otherwise it will take too much time for the engine to develop power again to get out of stall conditions. I really enjoy flying the F86 for fun and tend to use outside view much more than with other planes, simply because it is such a gorgeous model. Peter
  19. [1] There may be some news from Travis about FSCaptain in the next 1-3 months. [2] Yes, I tested it. It is good, but not exactly what I want. I don't care too much about unruly passengers, and when it comes to flight analysis, I prefer Newsky over SLC. What I miss most about FSC is the flexibility. I could set up my own airline and tell it which airports I want to fly to; I could have several airlines; it was just about piloting, not management of admin staff or flight attendants needed. A Pilot's Life, Newsky, On Air, Neofly are all good programs, but they all have at least one feature that ruins the experience for me.
  20. I am biased, but IMHO FSCaptain in FSX/P3D is better than what career addons we have for MSFS right now. Also, I think GSX was better in P3D than it is in MSFS since I could always get it to do what I want. And PFPX was more difficult to use but also more interesting than Simbrief. I guess for all these addons you needed to invest a bit of time to get the most out of it, but you learned a lot on your way. I like that.
  21. A friend of mine recently got the Quest 3 and also couldn't use the mouse. I turned out that he had to change a setting: "VR CAMERA RESET" was assigned to mouse axis X. Try to remove that, if it is set.
  22. Both. It is started externally, but once it is running you have an in-game panel for all actions.
  23. Thanks for explaining your project. I wouldn't say that the comments were hateful, but they certainly assumed that your request was not sincere. I think the reaction would have been different if you had been posting on Avsim for a little longer. We have had our experiences with new accounts who offer all kinds of rubbish, such as payware flight simulators based on open source code, phishing attempts through offers too good to be true, and dating women. I am glad that you are not in that category 🙂 Welcome to Avsim, Peter
×
×
  • Create New...