Budbud

Hello, I don't mean to sound disrespectful but what is the purpose of resurrecting a 6 year old post?

You are welcome!

I had forgotten one reference which will give you all the information that you need: "Cold weather operations" SP.16.2 in the FCOM v1. It explains thoroughly the de-icing / anti-ice in all phazes of the flight.

Hi, The FCTM actually gives several hints about how to use the anti-ice (search "anti-ice") and the chapter 3 section 20 of the FCOM v2 (p 3.20.1) explains how the system works and allows to understand as well how to use the switchs. For engine anti-ice switches for exemple, AUTO will switch the engine anti-ice only in flight. Therefore if you face icing condition on the ground before takeoff or after landing, you should set the switches to ON because if they are set to AUTO, the engine anti-ice will be off as long/soon as the aircraft is on ground.

I was not really keen on the click and drag before but now I'm used to it and I must confess that with a TrackIR and Ezdok, I find it much easier to use that having to maintain the cursor on the button to use the mousewheel. And actually setting the baro minimum to high values such as several thousand feet with the fast "detent" is much easier and much faster (scrolling the mousewheel again and again can be tedious...).

Crystal clear, now! thanks again for the answers.

Well that make sense, I would logically choose the minimum corresponding to my actual Vref, but what is sensible and what regulations say don't necessarily match! :wink: So I guess the approach category of the aircraft (based on her MLW according to the definition) and the approach categary "used" by the pilot to choose the minimum are not necessarily the same. However, can a pilot choose a minimum that corresponds to a category lower that the certified one of the aircraft? I mean a B77W is cat D at MLW but an empty may have a Vref corresponding to cat C. In that case, is the pilot allowed to choose a minimum corresponding to cat C or must the choice of the minima be conservative and keep cat D?

Hi, Thanks for the clarification. However, there is still something that gets me confused: According to what I have read about the approach categories, they are based on the Vat at MLW, so not dependent on the actual weight of the aircraft (except for the circling if I understand correctly). However, I'm not so sure when reading the posts above on what we must refer when select a minimum for an approach: still the MLW or the actual weight?

Hi, I have just found by chance a document from Boeing called "Airport Reference Code and Approach Speeds for Boeing Airplanes". In this document, the B737-800 and upward are classified cat D for approach. I'm not sure I'm allowed to post the link to that doc, so I just leave. An evidence that contrary to what we may logically expect, the approach speed has nothing to do with the aircraft size (we may think the bigger the faster), but according to that document, B738 and B739 are cat D along with B753 and B767, but B772 and B77L are cat C.

Hi, The option exists on the T7 to keep the sound running in background when not focused on sim but not on the NGX, as far as I know.

Hi, The offset is implemented in the T7. That's probably why you cannot find the paragraph anymore. :wink:

An other factor to choose flaps 30 is the noise abatement at your destination airport. Flaps 40 requires more thrust, hence more noise, even if it is obviously not a primary concern in the sim!

Hi, I had that issue ones and found out that FSX had re-mapped a key for the gear on one of my joystick. Double check that none of your hardware has any button mapped to gear in the FSX settings.

Hi, Submit a ticket to the PMDG support team here: http://support.precisionmanuals.com/ If you haven't yet, you need to create an account to submit tickets (different than the one used for purchase).

I didn't do much but you are welcome!

You need a second account for the support, different than the one used to buy. Did you try to register on the support page (the link I sent you) or on the main PMDG page?

Submit a ticket to the PMDG support: http://support.precisionmanuals.com/

Does the 777 works in FSX-SE? Is it just a problem with the OC? If it is the case, check that you have the latest version of the OC installed.

To add your name in the signature, go to Settings (under your forum account), then "Signature". Sorry to insist on that but you answered to Dan that you had uninstall FSX and install FSX-SE but you didn't specify whether you reinstalled the 777 for FSX-SE. While it may seem obvious and in no case I would like to give the impression to take you fo a fool, however it seems that the OC doesn't detect the installation of the 777. You may also submit a ticket to the PMDG support: http://support.precisionmanuals.com/ Hi, To add your name in the signature, go to Settings (under your forum account), then "Signature".

The full names must appear at the bottom of your posts or in your signature even if your forum names are your real names (read the forum rules for reference). I can see a + next to the PMDG 777-200LR/F, what is displayed when you pull down the submenu?

Hi, The OC indicates you have 5 notifications pending, what are they? By the way, full names are required on this forum.

Hi, I did several flights these days, some with 136T of fuel (63.4T in center tank) and didn't see this issue with the latest version. I was an issue with the previous version however. Double check that you have updated Fs2crew to the latest version.

Hello, This has been identified and corrected in the next update.

That's a good question. Most probably the crew would be vectored at some point on the Y59 or J142 to the final 17 or 35 rather than directed to a STAR but I don't have a documented answer to that. If I had to plan a flight YMML - YSCB without any info of the real route, I would probably plan DOSEL Y59 ARRAN because ARRAN is a transition to STARs for both runways 17 and 35. By the way, it shouldn't be DCT DOSEL, because DOSEL is the last point of a SID. Dct [WPT] in a flight plan is usually used in out of SID departure, for omnidirectional departure or vectors.

I agree, that's why I rarely send the poster to a manual without giving the reference. Unless it is blatant the answer doesn't require a specific knowledge but just open the manual and blatant the poster won't make any effort to get the answer that doesn't need any explanation by themselves.