dmarques69

Not for now, they say in " future update or expansion pack " if it's the second, means more money.

Got dam cut down that tree, you almost it it...TG your safe...nice video!

Its all written there, you have issues with the overlays on the +38-122.dsf, just delete that tile and make it again, full or just the overlays. I advice you to get xorganizer, its cheap but a great tool that will help you on the ini order and even find problems in your scenery, among other things.

If you already have a Quest just wait for the Link release to see if you are happy with it, then you decide... This new bet on Quest things just left us all with the feeling of abandoned product for the Rift S, understandably? not to me, i dont own any of it, i was about to get the Rift S, but now im not going to buy any of it from Oculus, thanks to mister Zuckerberg and hes marketing choices, but thats me.

I was about to post the same thing when i saw this...i inquire the dev directly about this, then this information appeared in their faqs, maybe was just a coincidence 🙂 Dave we are counting on you 🙂 any beta help you need you have my email 😉 the program will release this month.

For me misterx nailed again, autogen is awesome, forest looking very good, ground textures depends on the region, some i risk to say that are better that orthos, others not that much, but overall is a very good product that wroth the price asked.No FPS hit for me. In Europe together wit X-Europe buildings never looked so good.

Im downloading right now, can give you my opinion later on.

1. VR 2. Virtual Reality 3. Be able to fly with a headset

I will send you when i got home Dave, thanks.

Made a flight today from LGIR to LGTS in X-Plane and when i was on final there was a plane in the runway, pilot2atc instructed me to go around as it should be, and after gave me vectors to another approach, all good until that moment, but then it started to tell me go left go right and in a few minutes i was driving away from the airport, i pressed the approach button, all looked good, but i was far away from the point that indicates "your position" it seems that pilot2atc didn't know where i was, i requested vectors for a visual straight in, but again the vectors where incorrect and was another confusion, i ended ignoring the vectors and i went direct to the final approach fix.. I already made vectoring approaches and never had this...questions to Dave, could this be from this specific approach? or perhaps i made something wrong!? did you had any reports on the same? Thanks.

I like to fly as real as possible, i use "ATC assigns approaches" and consequently almost all the approaches are ILS ones because it assigns the most precision available. In real world as we know sometimes ILS's are out of order or the glideslope does not work forcing a LOC approach and so on. My suggestion/question to Dave, is possible to implement random approaches? similar to the already implemented random sids and starts? Thanks.

Tested now and no problems, thats probably the error 40.

XP it's a certainty the upcoming MSFS is a doubt on what is going to be, get XP, its a wordeful simulator and you wont regret.

Word from a real Airbus pilot is that the Hotas Wartog is the most close you have to an Airbus side stick, so grab that stick. This is the guy BTW, great content.

Well your probably wrong, i had Aerofly before the Vulkan update and i issued a refund on steam because the performance was not there, in VR reprojection was always kicking in, and i didnt had near the frames the OP is reporting, and i had a more powerful system that the OP as, anyway i don't own AF now so i cant make a direct comparing, that why i used the term probably.

Me to, been only flying in monitor because airliners and VR are not there at the moment in performance for me.

ZL19 wooooo you need a lot of storage for that Post a screenshot of one of those areas that you find blurry and identify the place, preferably in Europe, since i only have Europe in orthos for now, lest compare it.

Vulkan makes wonders, anxious for the day that Laminar makes it in X-Plane.

It depends of several things, the zoom level of the orthos, the source you use and the quality of the aerial photos of the place in question.

My specs are on my sig, for me it is, and im not the first to "complain" about it, of course also depends on the boy your flying and your settings, as for TrueEarth is a rather unique product there are nothing similar to compare, but with orthos and heavy airports i dont have any issues with performance.

Looks freaking awesome, lets hope that is not as heavy on the FPS's like the TrueEarth UK...

I have no issues with it, but im using clouds from a x-vision preset, i dont like the clouds that come with ASXP. Do you have any lua script running that messes with weather? If not best advice is run the XP installer and update it, is going to overwrite all to the default, and reinstall the clouds again, if the issue remains open a post in the x-plane org or better in the HIFi forum.

There are several options but the one to go is ortho4xp, that is free, gives you the best scenery you can get in a FS. I advise to take a look in forums.x-plane.org.

Porto is the second biggest city in Portugal, its was considered best European destination in 2017, its fed by LPPR airport Franciso Sa Carneiro, name of a famous Portuguese politician that curiously died in a plane crash back in 1980. Some features of the airport: BUILDINGS All the buildings in this scenery were designed as real as possible, thereby enhancing the experience and making it more immersive and real. These were modelled according to their existing architectural features and materials. The lighting of the airport and its surroundings has also been modelled according to these principles. In addition to Francisco Sá Carneiro Airport, the following were also modeled: Buildings around the airport such as warehouses, container park and car parks; Animated radar; Navigation station: Glideslope, ILS e DVOR/DME Oporto hotel Metro stations Airport freeway bridges and access Lighthouse in Leça da Palmeira, Matosinhos Pedro Hispano Hospital, Matosinhos Pedro Hispano Hospital Heliport Massarelos Heliport STCP Museum, Porto Vincci Hotel, Porto City bridges: Arrábida, Luiz I, Infante, D.ª Maria, S.João e Freixo Leixões seaport Leixões, Afurada e Freixo marinas Custom lighting Road traffic World Traffic Routes Custom mesh STATIC AIRCRAFT The LPPR scenery has no static aircraft in any of the existing Gates, so all Gates will be available for aircraft parking. ANIMATIONS This scenery has several animations, such as: Road traffic inside the airport Road traffic around the terminal Animated flags Leça da Palmeira Lighthouse with rotating lighting Animated Radar Some pics: Among the top works for scenery i have seen so far in X-Plane. Available here: https://store.x-plane.org/LPPR--Porto-Airport-UHD-Portugal_p_1025.html

I have a dream, a dream that one day will exist a flight simulator for PC that doesn't need plugins, addons, tweakings, installations, inventions and other things that give us headaches, time consumption and wallet vacuum... until then they are part of this wonderful world that we all like so much, the addons, they make our simmer prettier, more realistic, more immersive. Pilot2ATC is on top 3 for me for the best addons in any SIM ever in FS, i cant imagine a better program for ATC, is like having a simulator in a simulator, with more realistic voices it would be a perfect program. Thank you Dave, for this this wonderful tool, and the great support you always give with sympathy. Cheers