Lucky38i

When you enter your FROM/TO the IRS position is set to the center of the airport. You'd need to adjust it to be the exact point where you are. Yes the FMS is essentially the same in the Airbus A300 and a precursor to EIS1 but if INIT B has not been populated before engine start then you essentially "complete" it on the FUEL PRED page, so the FMS has the necessary information to build a path.

You need to turn on the laptop to your left near the cup holder

Personally I use spad so I can’t answer but you can find out with the $5 rental? Or ask on the discord.

I couldn’t say I use chaseplane simbrief imports have been implemented for a while now. With the most recent update the AT maintains FMC speed great. No issues with the VNAV either pending you don’t treat it like an NG.

What difference does it make? Personally I don't see why people are rejoicing on this as a win. There's nothing stopping mscenery from rebranding and doing the same thing. A better post would've been a revision of requirements on posting on the marketplace, descriptions that accurately depict the product, pictures that actually portray the product. If submissions to the marketplace can't adhere then they are denied. Furthermore reviews and ratings on products should be verified or at-least the review should contain some information, how long has the reviewer flown the plane (Someone who flew for 5 minutes is not someone's opinion im going to listen to), what are their PC specs etc. Similar to Steam's review system. Mscenery is simply the symptom of a poorly managed marketplace and banning them is a bandaid measure to make simmers happy temporarily. It doesn't fix things.

I'm not sure what feature, BATC released that would constitute as scope creep. Traffic and airport runway operations is a fundamental part of the Air Traffic Control process, this is a puzzling statement, what are you talking about? I really would like to see a piece of software that hasn't had several rewrites. It's a fundamental part of being a SWE, the ability to realize you're software as it currently stands is limiting to the vision you've set out. Especially with something like ATC, I mean just look at VoxATC. It's been in development for near 5-6 years at this point, I can guarantee they've had their fair share of rewrites, the only difference is you have the ability to be a part of that due to the early access program. Considering every area of BATC interconnects with other systems of itself, I really wonder how you would architect a system with code isolation here and minimize regressions. No area in ATC operates in a vacuum. Which is exactly why BATC has done a survey as-well as built emulators to help fix bugs. Early Access isn't a partnership, it's simply an opportunity to have an open view in the development process, which can often be ugly.

If its any consolation is currently undergoing QA for their native '24 build. Based on QA tests there's significant performance improvements and reduced VRAM usage. @blueshark747 if you're curious as-well.

I am curious how voxatc will stack up when it decides to come out

Honestly in ‘24 no issues at all, they even got rid of the double cursor that was in 2020. I actually lied there’s one minor issue, when you press start flight, your camera won’t work for like 2 seconds while chaseplane initialises. That’s pretty much it.

Chaseplane works relatively fine in VR, what issues are you having?

I just want to add, the FBW is a poor performer because when it released it was primarily detail to the max with very little optimisation. This was discussed in the NOTAM. There is however, an upcoming update in testing for FS24 that includes a large variety of performance optimisations and compliance with the fs24 SDK. that’ll result in greatly improved performance. Fbw showcased this at FSW last year and this year at the more recent event last weekend.

Your internet speed is unrelated to using wireless VR. It's dependent on the latency between your PC and your headset within your own network. To answer your question. I do not have a dedicated router for Wireless VR. I currently have a single Unifi U6+ paired with a Unifi CloudGateway Ultra. Having a separate AP gave me the confidence in that I didn't need a dedicated router for this setup. It deals with my household needs as-well as PCVR needs perfectly. If anything I need to by another AP as the signal is a little weak for the television upstairs but that's irrelevant. My PC is connected via Ethernet. I use Virtual Desktop (Fantastic piece of software) and my hardware is a 5800X3D paired with a 7800XT. Performance is acceptable enough where I genuinely refuse to go back to flatscreen, despite it being a much smoother experience. I have AutoFPS managing my settings as necessary to keep a stable 36 NFR fps. This is using a Quest 3 with a Bobovr Strap for extra batter life, though I only have the headset on for preflight, takeoff, approach and landing. Other times I switch back to flatscreen and turn on cinematic mode with Chaseplane and go about my day. If you are looking for a dedicated router, something like the Beryl AX for Glinet is a great performer.

And if their 3D modellers are employed, you're suggesting they should.. fire them? Then when they've fired the modellers, spend money on hiring programmers, spending 6 months acclimating them to the codebase. Only to finally finish the E-Jets, left with a team only consisting of programmers, which you now need to fire because you need modellers, animators, sound designers etc for the next project. As oppossed to utilising their current workforce to start working on the next form of cash flow, where they are best suited? Not to mention adding more programmers to a situation doesn't suddenly equate to faster development times. This is fairly simple project management stuff in most businesses, it really isn't that difficult to fathom why FSS is doing what they're doing.

Yeah let’s get the art team to work on systems cause that’s a great use of your workforce. that 3D modeller will make a great contribution to the autopilot rework.

On a side note but related topic, any updates from VoxATC?