Nothing is being moved from the old forum. All the old FS9 stuff is now in the FSX forum.Doug

If the old FS9 stuff isn;t being moved here, then part of the benefit of having an FS9 forum is negated... However, if I must, absolutely must, I can live with it this way.I do have to say that I think the benefit of an FS9 only forum was demonstrated, for me at least, today when I posted about my registry problem and the post wasn't immediately buried in FSX stuff. I had an answer to my question and then posted about the results of the solution offered within a very short period of time. A week ago, I'm pretty sure the post would have been lost in the "noise" of FSX this and FSX that.So, again, thanks for the FS9 forum.

Hello Democracy in action, you have got to love it.Seriously though THANKS TOM :-)

Howdy,Very much appreciated. Thanks.

me too, thanks Tom and the gang.I know I will probably be flamed for this, but, I went round to a friends house yesterday here in the UK, and I really didn't like what I saw of FSX, he has a great system just like myself, but like most of us, realises that he will have to up- grade his whole PC to get it running like they say it should run. (but remember what they said about FS2000 on the box !)This is going to be a very expensive new version of FS, a new PC, a new operating system that no one knows how much is going to cost yet etc.Then I will have to kiss good bye to a large portion of my FS9.1 add-ons.And before anyone says it, no, I'm not being negative about this, and yes, I do like modernisation etc, but what I have seen so far looks more "cartoon like" than "as real as it gets" I just hope that all the hype about DX10, and Vista Ultra and running FSX at "all to the right" (as I enjoy now in FS9.1) is worth it, as once you've made that leap there is no going back to FS9.1 as that new system won't run it!We'll just have to wait and see I suppose.

>If the old FS9 stuff isn;t being moved here, then part of the>benefit of having an FS9 forum is negated... However, if I>must, absolutely must, I can live with it this way. I was thinking the same thing. All the old FS9 posts are getting buried under a sea of FSX posts. Seems to me, the search engine will have to work that much harder, sifting through all the new FSX posts, whenever we need to refer back to something that was posted back in the "good ol' days". Perhaps, it should be SOP to start a new forum for each successive version of FS. I know there are concerns that it is more work for the moderators, etc. But, after a quick glance at the forum listings, there are 10 forums that haven't been posted to this month. There's plenty of fat that could be trimmed. The FS posts are going to come, regardless. They might as well target the users of specific versions. As the older versions drop off in popularity, they naturally become less work for the mods.Just my $.02. Thanks for the noise filter, Avsim.:-beerchug

Wilson

I would also like to add my thanks for this facility - a great boon to those of us who will not be switching to FSX in the near future. It will be interesting to see how much it is used.Bud

>Thank you, Avsim. Maybe in the future, FSX. Not now,>though.Same here..AnthonyUK

Thanx a lot AVSIM for listening!!!!!! :-)Best Regards,Hamilton

I never said how grateful I am for this FS9/FS2004 forum.Thankyou very much Tom! :-beerchug

regardsEdaka Capt. P[/font color]i[/font color]c[/font color]a[/font color]s[/font color]s[/font color]o[/font color]

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v640/edetroit100/eddd2.jpgMy FS9 Videos] AMD Athlon 64 3500+, 1024Mb PC3200 DDR, 300Gb HD 256Mb DDR Nvidia 7800 GTX PCI-E, Audigy 2 ZSCH Products Yoke, Pedals and Throttle Quadrant[/font color

Indeed! Thanks Avsim for thinking about all of us FS9 Simmers. :-) Cheers,Mark